Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama Run A "Why Won't Palin Answer Questions" Ad, Similar To Hillary's "Debate Me" Ads?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 12:58 PM
Original message
Should Obama Run A "Why Won't Palin Answer Questions" Ad, Similar To Hillary's "Debate Me" Ads?
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 01:01 PM by malik flavors
Remember the ads Hillary ran in Wisconsin asking why Obama was scared to debate her, and then gave reasons why he might be scared to do more debates? I think it might be a good idea to run an anti-Palin ad, asking why she won't take questions, and then list reasons why she isn't taking questions.

Is it because she was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it?
Is it because she spent more pork on balance than any other state in the country?
Is it because she left the (population 5000) city of Wasilla with $20 million dollars in debt?
Is it because she quote "hasn't given much thought about the Iraq war?"
Is it becasue she's still waiting for someone to tell her "what exactly it is that the VP does everday?"

Why isn't Sarah Palin answering the questions of the American people?

The script could be something like that, and could raise doubts about her record and readiness. The Obama camp needs to squash this narrative the McCain camp is building for her, and do it quickly before people really start to believe she's some kind of reformer. I think it's almost time to act and this could be a good starter since Palin is ducking and dodging the press. It would force her to answer these and other questions, and possibly before she's ready. Ya know, before she's finished reading her "Foreign Policy For Dummies" book and healthcare cliff's notes.

The Obama camp can wait a minute to see if it's totally necessary, but if the polls show a real lead going to McCain it's time to start putting serious doubts into the minds of voters about Palin's honesty and readiness to be vice president and the possible commander and chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. NO.
Obama was running against Clinton. He is not running against Palin. This is all distraction. He should be focusing on MCCAIN, the person he is running against for POTUS!!!

No one even mentions McCain anymore. He is the candidate. Palin is a false front. Get back on message against McCain and Barak will win this thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. I like the approach an earlier poster took.."we welcome the opportunity to
respond to the governor's positions, when she is available to discuss them"
now, regarding ...... our position is this....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. the Late Breaking news forum has a thread
about a McCain official saying that they offered Charles Gibson to do an interview with Palin later this week. I'm sure that there were "terms and conditions", like having the questions ahead of time or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Charlie Gibson is a Repub lap dog.
Did we need any more evidence than this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. yeah, Gibson is about as good as Fox news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. It would still be a good idea to get an ad like this out there. Even if that does happen sometime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely YES.
The DEMS cannot wait around for MSM to do what media does in a 'free' society. MSM has a horse in the race and it's the party that is most comfortable with media consolidation.

DEMS will have to go after the opposition themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. AWESOME post! I would LOVE to see that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary and Bill could easily raise questions about Palen being real...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. It worked fantastically well for Paul Wellstone.
His "Where's Rudy" ads are still considered milestones in political advertising.

I say go for it!

interestedly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama had better start running some kind of ad
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 01:14 PM by aint_no_life_nowhere
Maybe it's because I'm in a blue state (California) and Obama ads are not running here locally, but I'm not seeing much of anything except a very occasional political ad here and there. This is the time to be going great guns with all that campaign money.

BTW, I think the ad she have a statement that others have expressed on DU: "How can Sarah Palin face the Taliban or Vladimir Putin if she can't even face the American press?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yea, they need to start defining her before the McCain camp does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. someone please stop the stupid on DU. PALIN IS RUNNING FOR VP NOT PRESIDENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Palin is an example of McCain's lousy judgement
and should be painted as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Uh, VP is still part of the ticket. It's McCain/Palin, not just McCain anymore.
Jesus, do you want to continue to slide in the polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Could someone please stop the stupid on DU and realize why we lost the last two elections!!!!!
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 01:33 PM by kwenu
McCain/Palin must be attacked relentlessly wherever weakness shows. Palin is absolutely as much an issue as McCain. This "it doesn't really matter because intellectually we know" stuff only works with people you hang out with. That is not enough to elect a president in the America of today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Democrats always over think this shit. Attacking works. Period. Haven't we learned that yet?
It's the same thing every 4 years. Just ignore it and it won't hurt us. When will people learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Absolutely. I am amazed at how many still want to fall back to a proven losing strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. So, you're saying if Palin is caught lying about something we should ignore it?
Why on Earth would you pass up a chance to take your opponent down a peg?

Her favorables right now are higher than Obama, McCain, and Biden's. You think we should just let her be America's perfect sweetheart and not do anything? How is that smart? She's the only reason McCain is doing well now. If he had picked Romney he'd still be behind. You attack your opponent's strengths and Palin is McCain's greatest strength right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hell yes. Like yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. NO
As Frank Rich states in his column today and I agree..they got palin to be a high speed distraction from the policies of john mccain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Yeah, I know. It's not like it's working for McCain.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. YES!
They need to start running ads. That's why I sent them money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sidney J Mussburger Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. How did Hillary do in Wisconsin after those ads?
Palin not doing interviews and being sequestered while they teach her talking points is an issue that I'm sure will be addressed by surrogates and possible ads but your Hillary comparison doesn't hold water because she lost Wisconsin by a large margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC