Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What will the rethug reaction be once Palin's adulterous affair is exposed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:18 AM
Original message
What will the rethug reaction be once Palin's adulterous affair is exposed?
With the Enquirer's track record for exposing this type of stuff, I suspect that within a week or two, this story about her adulterous affair with her husband's business partner will start gaining some serious traction.

Here's how it will unfold, tell me if I am wrong.

Sarah Palin makes a tearful confession, admits to giving in to "temptation", calling it a "momentary weakness of the flesh".

The religious right will once again rally around her, bringing up their whole "forgiveness and redemption" meme. They'll say what a brave woman she is to admit her weakness, and they'll blab on and on about how Christ forgives all, so we should be willing to forgive.

This is how they react when it's one of their own. Just like they did with her pregnant daughter, who obviously didn't listen to her mom's abstinence speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus told her to do it.
Said it would strenghthen her family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
66. "Republicons are special. Smirk." - BC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the Religious Right will christen the ticket: The Adultery Platform.
I can hear the accolades now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
30. is one of her children - his?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is this wishful, post-Edwards thinking? Or is there sbstance to this?
If so, link pls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. The National Enquirer is reporting on it
It's been discussed here on DU a few times. Obviously there isn't any 'substance' to it just yet, but neither was there any at first regarding the Edwards affair. Remember how many of us poo-pooed the Enquirer when they broke the Edwards story, only to have him admit the affair?

I'd love to see this be true. The religious right might rally around her, but it's going to turn off much of their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
57. The Edwards thing didn't get any traction until the whole incident at the hotel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
60. There's nothing to sue on, yet.
I read the article. They're very careful how they phrased it. I read the article: it has just two sentences about "allegations of an adulterous affair" brought up in the midst of stormy family discussions on other stuff. No doubt they're out digging for further evidence right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. maybe a little of both
Edited on Fri Sep-05-08 09:22 AM by Epiphany4z
it is from the enquirer...they did break the Edwards thing..but they are enquirer...soooo...McCains camp has already threatened to sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. link for the hungry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. i wonder when they (NE) are going to run the pushback
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder how they can prove something like that.
I would guess that unless they have a letter or a text or an email that people will discount it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. She was rumored to a party in her husbands business partners divorce
He's trying to get the divorce records sealed by court order.

Too late, methinks the cat is out of the bag.

National Enquirer got there first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. oh it is ok
its over and she did the right thing she stayed with her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, they DID welcome Diaper Boy back to Congress with a
round of cheers ya know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. She's Done If There's Proof With The Emphasis On The Word "Proof"
You need the admission of her lover and third party witnesses who put the two together in places where two people married to other people should not be...

That's a tall order...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
50. BS -- the soap opera stuff works for the Kennedys, the British royal family, as for Eva Peron
to fail to recognize this is to imagine we live in an age before mass media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #50
65. We Still Have A Double Standard...An Adulterous Women Is Still Looked Upon Worse
Edited on Fri Sep-05-08 03:24 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Men are expected to be weak...

And the Kennedy women were faithful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. She'll make a crying confession (a la Jimmy Swaggart) and the fundies will all forgive her...


...and then they'll attack the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. More white powder will be sent to the Enquirer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
59. With Ivins out of the picture, they can't do that anymore...
They'd have to reopen the investigation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Exactly! They'll just suppress their cognitive dissonance, and embrace hypocrisy.
It's what they do. They couldn't be republicans otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nope. Unless they have PICTURES
She won't admit to anything - at least until after the election. Repug Fudies are only forgiving up to a point... even they would draw the line at an affair, preggo daughter, current investigation.

If they only have "sources" confirming this - then they will deny, and spin it as the media is being horribly unfair and is out to do whatever they can to squash the threat that Palin poses.. blah blah blah. They will spin it as a sexist media & the left wing going after another woman just like they did Hillary.

Then, after they election is over - win or lose.. they can come clean. They already have the seat (or don't) for 4 more years.. but unless they have pictures (and even then they'd probably just say they were photoshoped) or DNA evidence... there will be no admission from this administration until after November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. I expect the NE will have pictures, no smoke without fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enfield collector Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. it depends on whether he kept the dress he jizzzed over. if not I'd say
she's home free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. So were they right about Obama murdering the gay choir director?
Edited on Fri Sep-05-08 09:34 AM by jobycom
They sort of got it right on the John Edwards story, but they weren't the only ones who reported that one. They just picked up a rumor and got lucky. 90% of their stuff is still bogus. If they pull out some real proof, then I'll worry about how the Republicans will react.

Our candidates have been on the losing end of false rumors and pure fiction too often for me to embrace that crap about the other side. I'm stunned by the garbage on DU lately. For seven years around here we've complained about the personal slanders and unfounded rumors the media launches against our candidate, and yet with Palin, we can't find garbage too sleazy for our tastes. Pure hypocrisy. There should be a difference between Republican and Democrat beyond just the names of the candidates.

http://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/2008/03/national-enquir.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. I didn't know they'd made that accusation. Shame on them.
I knew that choir director, and his death--at Christmastime, no less--was devastating for the congregation. If they tried to make tabloid fodder of it, well, shame on them.

But they did get the Edwards thing right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Shame on them always. The couple of times they get something "right"
just makes some people believe all the lies they tell the rest of the time. Shame on anyone who gives them any credibility on anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. They'll deny it and blame the liberal press. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is where the sexist double standard comes in.
As much as I hate it, I think Palin will have a more difficult time with this than if a male candidate had an affair.

Men who cheat are seen as "bad boys" who couldn't resist temptation.
Women who cheat are seen as "whores".

If true, and there's any real proof, it will end her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. I wonder what the time frame for the alleged affair was. Seems to me that
an affair in the past (say 10-15 years ago or more) won't have the same impact that a more recent one. Heck, McCain had an affair with Cindy many years ago and that doesn't seem to be bothering anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
21. No way. If she were to admit it she is done. Too off message. I personally do not think it is true
Daughter is one thing, personal failing is quite another. So even if it is true, which I doubt, she will deny all as long as possible. Kind of a tough thing to prove, unless she were to be named as the "other woman" in a divorce suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
32. if she was named they would be certainly quick to cover that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Actually, someone posited last night that the "Affair that almost ended her career" isn't her affair
but another couple's that she got tangled in with some legal issues.

We will see but don't get too deep in the woods on this. The GOP has a big broom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
23. you're wrong.
Palin denies it. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. So?
Of course she's denying it now. They always do. Edwards denied it at first also.

I'm talking about once proof starts coming out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. what sort of proof do you think that they have?
Short of a photo of her in a compromising position with this guy or a letter or correspondence whose authenticity is unquestionable, its likely that the only proof that the Enquirer will havewill be one person's word against another. And if that's the case, Palin will deny it, attack the "witness's" credibility and tought it out.

From what the ENquirer has indicated -- that the source of info on the affair is the family of the ex-brother in law -- I'd be surprised if they can come up with the kind of "proof" that would force her to admit to anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
61. "retard" . Nice, Very Nice.
I'm sorry I called you an idiot. I insulted idiots everywhere.

Try reading. The premise of the question (and of the answer) was that there is no "proof" -- no baby, no photos of clandestine meetings in hotel rooms, hiding in closets. There is someone saying she did and she says she didn't. Does she "tearfully confess" for that? You may think so, but then again, you do make idiots look like Rhodes scholars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. *If* it's proven that she had an affair, the pukes will sweep it under the rug.
She's running with a POW don'cha know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth_ Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. The blessed virgin is blameless
It was just another plan from Gawd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
40. She repented to Our Lord and Savior and has been reborn.
Just like the POW Adulterer John Sidney McCain III, your humble servant with seven homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
28. They'll wait for Rush Limbaugh to blow the dog whistle and come up with the response
Whatever explanation Rove and Limbaugh can come up with, that's what extremist right wing preachers throughout America will start pushing to their flocks. The flocks of sheep will open their mouths, stick out their tongues like dogs, and say "yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. You speak the truth - they will wait to see how Rush reacts
If Limbaugh acts like it's no big deal, then they'll circle the wagons.

However, if Limbaugh says she's gotta go, she'll be off the ticket in no time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
34. As long as Jaysus was handling the cum towel, it will be A-OK with those pigs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
35. Adultery will become a sacrament
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
37. Did the pre-election Bill Clinton stories hurt him?

No.

Bill and Hillary appeared jointly, said there had been "pain" in their marriage, and that they'd moved on.

And that was that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
67. See #65
In our culture nothing is more pathetic than a cuckolded man...

Don't ask me why...

That's the way it is...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpi10d Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
38. depends on the strength of the story
If its he said -she said without some further proof, it will be denied and right wingers will buy into the denial. Not much will come from it. If its a solid as the Edwards story, it could swing a few independent voters our way, mainly based on McCain's judgment picking Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
39. Of course the talibornagains will forgive her
and the McCain campaign will have her and Scott appear on stage together as a big fuck-you to the rest of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
41. This is the downside of being so damn "cute".
Who knows how many guys tried for it? How much temptation was she supposed to resist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
43. The RW nuts will just say "bless her heart" and
pretend it didn't happen....they'll just move on - business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Or they'll say
it was just butt sex. It didn't violate God's word or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
45. Evidence?
Is there any actual evidence of an affair? I saw some other post that said the NE article was about the business partner's WIFE having an affair, not Palin.

Can we clear this up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaDeacon Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
48. The Enquirer is right more offten than it is wrong.
Please don't forget that NE is not the other tabloid rags. Often it's "bombshell" stories hit hardest because they are well research and sourced to avoid being sued. Ask Bob Dole. McGrandpa and The Skirt are hoping to duck this and other question for 60 days ...not going to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. the fundies won't care a bit. But the indies might....
If you're on the fence, why would you decide that you want to go thru that daily scandal drip drip drip (no blue dress puns intended) again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. Republicans would overlook murder, this is nothing to them
Do you actually believe that this will affect the Republicans if it is substantiated? They have exonerated McCain for his loathsome conduct that he deserted his wife when she was crippled. As he stated, "It's my greatest moral failure," at a Church service in Arizona. He was greeted with applause. It doesn't affect the Republican one iota. Look how they continue to flock to those such as Limbaugh the drug addict and O"Reilly the sexual pervert. Bill called up his young female assistant and described in revolting detail how he was shoving things up his fat ass while masturbating. She sued him and FOX and they settled out of court. His reward for his predatory sexual behavior, a new contract and a raise as Republican tuned in to admire their hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabbits4love Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
63. well the good thing about it would be
the media would have a frenzy fest with that kinda story... and if fundies on the right didnt denounce it and her, theyd call out their hypocracy for saying john edwards should be ashamed and hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. A0 Stop this horrifc slander of a fine, upstanding, "True Christian TM" woman! or
B) (if there's proof) "You all just made that up!" or C) (if she tells all) "She's confessed her sin and made things right with Gawd. No one is perfect, but as long as she seeks the Lord's forgiveness and help all is well."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
53. She'd lose men in droves
Cheating men are forgiven, but men are biologically programmed to fear women cheating on them. It hurts reproductive success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
55. Your version will be the response. If it doesn't work,
* will invade Iran/Georgia/pick-the-county of most distraction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
56. Don't count your chickens before they're hatched.
And don't go treating rumor and speculation as fact: maybe she had an affair, and I think it's right that she's under the microscope (for everything from her administrative record to her political affiliations), but we're not going to do ourselves any favors talking about speculation as if it were proven fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
58. He was drilling her wetlands to bring down the price of oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabbits4love Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
62. lets just hope if it is infact true
they wait until the end of october to bring all the evidence out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
64. They'll figure she fits right in with the party. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
68. They will say-
"Christians aren't perfect, they're just forgiven."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC