Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'We'll set a new standard for transparency and accountability in government.' But my Navy file MUST remain secret.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:59 PM
Original message
'We'll set a new standard for transparency and accountability in government.' But my Navy file MUST ...
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 10:03 PM by ProgressiveEconomist
But my Navy file MUST remain secret.

Why hasn't he signed Standard Form 180, as John Kerry did, to release his unredacted complete Naval career record file to the media? Why hasn't anyone in the media asked him about this? Don't they do routine fact-checking of political speeches.

IMO, McCain's continual use of "POW" as a mantra for quashing any embarrassing question on any policy issue is like HRC's touting her First Lady experience as full preparation for the Oval Office. IMO, McCain should be forced to release his service records just as Kerry was and just as HRC was forced to release White House records.

It seems surreal to me that a candidate can claim a certain kind of experience as primary qualification to be President, while simultaneously withholding most documentation of that experience.

IMO, while Obama must steer entirely clear of questioning McCain's "POW" claim on the Presidency, Obama supporters outside the campaign must not neglect going straight after McCain's primary selling point to voters. If the "press corpse" were doing its job, we wouldn't have to, but in their absence, somebody's got to step in and confront this supremely arrogant cover-up

What do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah, what's good for the goose is good for the geezer
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clearly the RVP candidate was not properly vetted. But has JOHN McCAIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. That kind of hypocrisy rolls my eyes back into my head
I've been watching a movie and reading posts. I think the only thing we can say is that this is theater for the faithful and grist for the rest of us.

I just turned it on for a minute and see the crowd that doesn't fill the arena. All are clustered as close around him. They couldn't even get enough faithful to fill the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC