Ouch in the comments on this story
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/03/rosen.palin/index.html?iref=mpstoryviewPalin's speech was devoid of content, other than stuff that convinced me she is not what the country needs right now. Health care and the economy were avoided like the third rail. The war in Iraq was mentioned only to manipulate sentiment, not to offer solutions; Palin's military son and her other children were trotted out in the same vein. The GOP campaign strategy remains, clearly, to pick out their opponent's strengths and ridicule them with schoolyard-type taunting. No alternatives to Obama's policy plans were offered.
She appealed shamelessly to nationalism rather than patriotism--the success of that strategy manifest by the grunt-like chants of U-S-A thoughout the auditorium (in which many of the seats appeared empty, by the way). The "Drill baby drill" chant showed her supporters in their worst light, and should repel rather than attract many of the people the party had hoped to sway by choosing her.
We are not fooled by her folksiness or dazzled by the glitz. We need a president who can govern, and a vice-president who is more than a token. It is ludicrous, and typical GOP simplistic thinking, to imagine that undecided women voters might accept her as a "Hilary substitute." More like the "feminist bridge to nowhere," as she has been aptly dubbed. less