|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
TalkingDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 09:54 AM Original message |
National Enquirer Affair Scandal: not Edwards....Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yup. This one could get interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. The GOP don't play fair. They were happy to have Edwards displayed all over the place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. Won't that make people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
4. That little town of Wasilla: veritable Peyton Place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamsterjill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
5. Please, Santa!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. And the Enquirer response to legal action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. "our political reporting ... more detail-oriented than the McCain campaign's vetting process" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightOwwl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. "a vicious war within Sarah Palin's extended family" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. Accusation once made hs to be proven, but investigative look at Gov and Mayoral jobs more important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
8. Has the National Enquirer story about Sarah Palin's alleged affair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TalkingDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. As far as I can tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. It's there - the cover of the current issue is on the upper right of their homepage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lutherj (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
9. In the good ol' days, they didn't use lawyers. They just sent out anthrax letters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
10. I'm SURE the Enquirer isn't worried about a threat! I think they get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
13. Looks like the apple didn't fall far from the tree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
16. Does anyone know when the affair was supposed to have occurred? Heck, McCain had affair with Cindy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TalkingDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-04-08 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
17. just because it's funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC