Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Sarah pregnant when she got married?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:50 PM
Original message
Was Sarah pregnant when she got married?
Rumors are flying like frisbees around the internet.

If true, that puts a whole nother spin on the "abstinence only" education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course. That's why she eloped. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't remember where, but I read that Track was born 33 weeks after
their marriage. And there was no indication that he was premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. and Sarah is running about trying to stop sex education? that bit her in the ass, didn't it?
Bet she now wishes her daughter got a little bit of info on birth control. Bet Levi's parents wish so also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. yes, 33.5 weeks later...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I did hear on the radio this afternoon that 8 months after she was
married, her first baby was born. They did NOT add that the baby was a premie, so I can only assume.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. 1st baby born 8 months after I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JenniferJuniper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't have a link, but I believe so.
Unless Trackster was a preemie, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JenniferJuniper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Screw not as I say,
not as I do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KewlKat Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. It sounds like it to me. No mention of a preemie that I can find.
Sarah Palin’s son was born on April 20, 1989. The Palins eloped and were married on August 29, 1988.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes - The Whole Family Supports Drilling In Alaska /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madam Mossfern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. So was I
but then again, I don't tell anyone what to do with their bodies.

BTW- I have four kid, and my daughter figured out the math one night at the dinner table....Holy moley, was my son's face red. The other two didn't understand. I have always supported comprehensive sex ed.

Oh, I was just under 30 when I had my first kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Nothing wrong with sex ed... IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yup. It's their kind of family values. Forms a pattern. Parental neglect. . . nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not to interrupt, but there are already like 30 stories on Palin out there. Can we...
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 10:04 PM by sfam
discuss those that matter? Honestly, I really can't even try to get up the gumption to care whether they had premarital sex. They've been married for like 20 years, so it must be great sex. Good for them. Now about all those earmarks, abuse of power issues, secession from the US, complete ignorance on the issues that matter and the lack of experience...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think these are important issues regarding Republican hypocrisy and they need to be discussed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Again, I'm amazed when the nation can hold even 3 stories at once. Pick your 3 scandals...
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 10:16 PM by sfam
Do you honestly think the fact that we find out a couple who has been married for 20 years had premarital sex and then got married because of it even breaks the top 10 Palin scandals?

Watching the 3 networks this evening, in their interviews, they were only able to mention 2-3 scandals. Of course the daughter pregnancy was #1, followed by the independence party and the earmark mayor thing. Again, if we had our choice, I can think of quite a few bigger issues than Palin getting knocked up and then married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Not when they have a penchant for telling us how to live and even die.
I'd love for the stories to keep piling up. A new one everyday until the election is fine by me and with every story the question needs to be asked what kind of vetting did McCain do and is this how he will make decisions as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. But but but the puggies told me they eloped to save their parents' money!
Dammit ... we haven't heard one true word about this woman. She's friggin' LONESOME RHODES (see the fabulous old political movie "A Face in the Crowd," starring Andy Griffith).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balderdash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. The whole family can field dress a moose!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Was Obama's mom married when she had Barack? She was 18 years old when she gave birth.
Give it up.

When or how or who has a baby is NONE of your business.

When are you going to finally get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Obama isn't being a hypocrite and we're not giving anything up until Obama wins. Get it?
Edited on Wed Sep-03-08 12:10 AM by kwenu
An Obama win is what DUers like want right? I'm starting to wonder about a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC