Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And the Vetting Goes On

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:44 PM
Original message
And the Vetting Goes On

And the Vetting Goes On

September 1st, 2008 by JAZZ SHAW

At this point it has almost become tedious… one can only jam one’s head against the same brick wall so many times before the roughshod imprints begin to dent the cranium too far. But in the ongoing saga of the vetting of Sarah Palin (which we have been repeatedly assured by the McCain team was done thoroughly and carefully before Friday’s surprising announcement) there is yet another crack in the wall coming out of the convention.

(Video Mitchell: GOP Lawyers in Alaska for "Deeper Vet")

We had heard hints of this. But just moments ago, Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC said that Republican lawyers are currently doing a vet of Sarah Palin up in Alaska. We’ll get you the video shortly. But it seems that the really deep vet of Palin started after her selection was announced.

While this may seem vindictive, I have seen the standard talking points issued in defense of both the vetting and the qualifications of Sarah Palin as our next Vice President. Frankly, even before seeing the report above, I have hardly been convinced by either. Never mind the fact that nobody ever checked into the hometown newspapers where Palin was Mayor. Perhaps we can assume that Team McCain knew that the pro-life, abstinence-only, family-values-oriented Palin’s unmarried teenage daughter was pregnant. The bridge to nowhere flip flop, the windfall profits tax on Alaskan oil interests, and the obvious questions about why a state Governor’s office was involving themselves in the employment issues of a state trooper barracks… we can let it all go for now.

What exactly would be so bad? I’ve been involved in politics at various levels since the Nixon administration and blogging and/or doing radio since before the invasion of Iraq, but I feel like a silly freshman asking the question. Yet still I must ask! Why? Would it be all that awful to say that the choice had been Pawlenty, or Lieberman or Ridge or even Charlie Crist? To admit that something - be it the Democratic convention, Obama’s speech, the polls… something - spooked McCain into a rapid and unwise pick of someone even less qualified than Obama with so little to recommend her to the office? And with so much baggage attached? The convention hasn’t reached its peak. Is it really too late to turn back?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm thinking that our convention scared the hell out of him, so he
went for a fundie to energize his crazy base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. She was backup plan D
If you were plan A, B, or C how would you feel about him coming back to you now?

The Base is all they think about, say isn't "The Base" the translation for "al qaeda"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Notice in the OP the emphasis on the word
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 09:49 PM by ProSense
"less." This was written by someone not firmly in Obama's camp, but still having doubts about McCain.

He screwed up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is clearly the worst pick I ever saw - and that includes 1972, the first year I voted
There's a problem for everyone here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's bizarre. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC