Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Moore's truth vs. Swiftliars: how did media handle each?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:02 AM
Original message
Michael Moore's truth vs. Swiftliars: how did media handle each?
can you believe the differences between all the instant factcheck bits the media did when F911 came out?

and the way they STILL treat the swiftliars as a valid story, their newsworthiness being the fact that they merely EXIST?

ANY lie put out by the pugs has legs until the media finally get around to checking it out, but somebody like Moore gets INSTANT analysis by the most febrile liars from the far right

has anybody talked about this distinction?

I don't remember discussion of it, even by Moore

anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC