Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Sarah Palin Endanger the Life of Her Fifth Child? Or is the Swirling Rumor True? Read on...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:22 AM
Original message
Did Sarah Palin Endanger the Life of Her Fifth Child? Or is the Swirling Rumor True? Read on...
It's One or the Other.

Submitted by BuzzFlash on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 7:46am. Alerts

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT

Here is the Rumor: Okay, It's a Sleazy Rumor that Palin Hid the Alleged Pregnancy of Her Daughter, Down in the Gutter. But This is Certainly a Curious Item from a Texas Paper in April Then, And Almost Inexplicable Considering Palin Allegedly Broke Her Bag of Water in Texas While at a Conference, But Insisted on Flying Back to Alaska to Deliver the Child After Giving a Speech. Now, That's Mighty Curious, Could Have Even Endangered the Child...Well, If It Was Her Child. This is a Real Story from a Real Texas Paper.

Here is the fact from a the Texas Ft. Worth-Telegram in April:

From Alaskan NBC affiliate KTUU:

Just yesterday, Palin was in Texas at a forum on energy with Texas Gov. Rick Perry and executives from four other states.

The governor's water broke during the energy conference but she stayed and gave a 30-minute speech before boarding an Alaska Airlines plane home to deliver the baby.

Palin gave birth to Trig Paxson Van Palin Friday at 6:30 a.m.

No word on why Palin was so determined to make sure young Trig wasn't born a Texan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Child endangerment
If not, she is lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Posted links on this yesterday at this link - Definite poor judgement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can we stop these things?
We're beginning to:

1. Sound like chauvinists
2. be that that we despise
3. undermine mothers everywhere in their choices.

Seriously, it is offensive to the many,many mothers here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. No because it illustrates Palin's poor judgement - risk baby's life & travel 11 hrs while in labor,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It appears to be speculation.
Guess what? My water broke 24 hours before the birth of my son. I guess I suffer from poor judgement as well. Let's not be the people that we rail against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. What does when your water broke have to do with anything? Did you get on a plane for 12 hours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. No, but I did think I was peeing and thought nothing of it.
Which, in due course endangered the life of my son. Something I still feel sick about but also feel is no one else's business. Had I knowingly had my water break and been 12 hours away from my dr? You bet your ass I would. Make of it what you will. I find I don't give much of a shit what people have not one iota of an idea "think" anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Her poor judgement was in the fact that she did not go to the local hospital
to be monitored, knowing that child is disabled will be born premature, & uwas nderweight.

Look here's the argument
Quote...
Palin made the decision to travel to Texas to a Governor's conference while 36 weeks pregnant, a time during which obstetricians would tell you it’s foolish to travel via plane. Air travel is a known risk for pregnancy complications, which is indeed what happened. The governor, while on a self-promoting trip to deliver a speech, had premature rupture of fetal membranes: her water broke.

Call your local OB department and ask what to do if you think that your water has broken. You’ll be advised to seek an immediate hands-on examination by an obstetrician. The baby will be placed on a monitor to make sure it’s OK. Premature rupture of membranes can lead to life-threatening infection and premature delivery.

What did Sarah Palin do? She did NOT go to a local hospital and did NOT have her baby checked on a fetal monitor to make sure it was OK. She called her family practice doctor in Alaska for advice. What advice was given isn’t clear, but it’s clearly quoted that she "did not ask for a medical OK to fly". Whether it was OK to fly should be the FIRST question anyone considering traveling by air should have, if they were at all interested in protecting the life of the unborn. Regardless, she decided to give her speech at the conference without having any evaluation other than the long-distance advice of a family practitioner. Her speech was more important to her than making any effort to make sure her unborn child was OK. Then, she decided to fly back to Alaska, an 11-hour trip. In addition, she failed to inform flight personnel that her water had broken.

Airlines are unequipped to handle most emergencies at 30,000 feet, particularly the kind Palin put her unborn child at markedly increased risk for. These emergencies include birthing a premature infant or uncontrolled maternal bleeding. This was her FIFTH pregnancy and delivery can happen rapidly and unexpectedly. The baby or Palin could easily have died.

In the ADN article Palin downplays her decision to fly, implying traveling was reasonable as she wasn't in labor. If so, then why was she immediately hospitalized after returning to Alaska? Why was there an induced delivery of a 36-week infant by 6:30 am soon after her return? Again, ask any OB doctor. Induced delivery of a premature infant ALWAYS indicates a problem. The two most likely would be fetal infection, (a likely event given her failure to seek meaningful medical attention for her baby) or fetal distress by monitor.

Ask your OB doctor if the risks Palin took with the life of her unborn child are risks they would have advised for ANY reason. Then ask yourself whether Palin is truly pro-life, or only pro-Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. The whole story screams cover-up for her daughter.
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:42 AM by marylanddem

She was at the conference when she got word her daughter was in labor. No one would go through what she supposedly went through. She lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm a mother and it's not the least bit offensive to me.
Not all mothers are good mothers. Not all mothers are honest and sincere.

Sarah Palin, before she's a woman and a mother, is a HUMAN BEING. She is as likely to make mistakes and tell lies and screw up as anyone else, and we have the same right to know about it as if she were a man.

Motherhood does NOT innoculate one against the consequences of deception.


Tansy Gold, mother, mother-in-law, grandmother.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Sorry,Tansy...so am I (2 kids) and am completely sick of our behavior
on this pregnancy. My water broke a full 24 hours before I realized it, possibly endangering my son. This actually happened. With Sarah Palin, we're not even sure it happened and yet we run with it. It is sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Fair enough, but she is the VP pick! it screams poor judgement to get on a plane
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:50 AM by demo dutch
for 11 hrs while in labor and not disclosing to the airline what state she was in, knowing the baby was premature & disabled, risk infection

Look... Palin made the decision to travel to Texas to a Governor's conference while 36 weeks pregnant, a time during which obstetricians would tell you it’s foolish to travel via plane. Air travel is a known risk for pregnancy complications, which is indeed what happened. The governor, while on a self-promoting trip to deliver a speech, had premature rupture of fetal membranes: her water broke.

Call your local OB department and ask what to do if you think that your water has broken. You’ll be advised to seek an immediate hands-on examination by an obstetrician. The baby will be placed on a monitor to make sure it’s OK. Premature rupture of membranes can lead to life-threatening infection and premature delivery.

What did Sarah Palin do? She did NOT go to a local hospital and did NOT have her baby checked on a fetal monitor to make sure it was OK. She called her family practice doctor in Alaska for advice. What advice was given isn’t clear, but it’s clearly quoted that she "did not ask for a medical OK to fly". Whether it was OK to fly should be the FIRST question anyone considering traveling by air should have, if they were at all interested in protecting the life of the unborn. Regardless, she decided to give her speech at the conference without having any evaluation other than the long-distance advice of a family practitioner. Her speech was more important to her than making any effort to make sure her unborn child was OK. Then, she decided to fly back to Alaska, an 11-hour trip. In addition, she failed to inform flight personnel that her water had broken.

Airlines are unequipped to handle most emergencies at 30,000 feet, particularly the kind Palin put her unborn child at markedly increased risk for. These emergencies include birthing a premature infant or uncontrolled maternal bleeding. This was her FIFTH pregnancy and delivery can happen rapidly and unexpectedly. The baby or Palin could easily have died.

In the ADN article Palin downplays her decision to fly, implying traveling was reasonable as she wasn't in labor. If so, then why was she immediately hospitalized after returning to Alaska? Why was there an induced delivery of a 36-week infant by 6:30 am soon after her return? Again, ask any OB doctor. Induced delivery of a premature infant ALWAYS indicates a problem. The two most likely would be fetal infection, (a likely event given her failure to seek meaningful medical attention for her baby) or fetal distress by monitor.

Ask your OB doctor if the risks Palin took with the life of her unborn child are risks they would have advised for ANY reason. Then ask yourself whether Palin is truly pro-life, or only pro-Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Not to this mother and grandmother.


I am sick of people trying to teach me manners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Feel free to place me on ignore because I intend to keep my opinions.
Which are also not worth the time when used as "manner lessons" here.


P.S. Not to "teach" you but ignore is the little red "x" at the top up there by my name... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Sorry, a VP candidate's choices are ALL far game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
35. And FAIR game, too! :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. It would be interesting to know when her return flight was booked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. According to an Alaskan poster yesterday, there is a love/hate competitiveness between Alaska and
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:29 AM by 1Hippiechick
Texas, and that it would not have boded well for the Alaskan governor's baby to be born in Texas. Plus, it's being said that she stretched this story to build street cred about her toughness and dedication to the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. so why did she go to Texas in the first place that late in her pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Especially knowing the circumstances of her pregnancy!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's a damn rumor. It's her child and she can do what she wants.
Would you want someone telling you what you how to raise your kids?! Probably not. Of course she does for a living. However, if we're pro-choice and believe in women's independence we don't begrudge her nonsense.

Leave This Alone!!


This is not to deal with us, if you need to focus on her, focus on her issues and policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. FINALLY... Common Sense... I'm off to hide all these stupid posts now.
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:36 AM by MrsGrumpy
:yourock:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:36 AM
Original message
I wish people would stop trying to stop the conversation

about a legitimate issue: possible hypocrisy and lying and cover-up to further one's own political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. The 12 hour flight is NOT a rumor. Either she lied or she risked a baby's life. Either alternative
most defintely is the business of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. She endangered her child's life, plain and simple
Assuming she can be believed.

This is the human equivalent of Mitt Romney strapping his dog to the roof of the car while his family went on vacation. In fact, I think I saw more outrage and ridicule of that on this board than this. I'll bet even you were more outraged by the dog incident. It figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. Not a rumor check this discussion and article in Anchorage Daily news
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:57 AM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. I Know Someone who works in PAX Services at Alaska Airlines


An they said if they had any hints or indication that a PAX had broke water or started contraction they would be denied boarding no matter who they are.....She would have had to change planes in Seattle/Portland Or the total flight time would have been around seven hours plus 45 minutes to change planes.

Airlines will not take a chance on a diversion that will cost them 10-15 thousand buckeroos just because they are the Gov of Alaska....

My friend is looking into the validity of this to see if this is consistent as reported.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Good. It is a very bizarre story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. That's why Sarah NEVER told the airline what her situation was!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. How do you know that? And when was the last time you were in labor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. It's been written about extensively in the Anchorage Daily News!
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:52 AM by demo dutch
http://www.adn.com/626/story/382864.html

Palin made the decision to travel to Texas to a Governor's conference while 36 weeks pregnant, a time during which obstetricians would tell you it’s foolish to travel via plane. Air travel is a known risk for pregnancy complications, which is indeed what happened. The governor, while on a self-promoting trip to deliver a speech, had premature rupture of fetal membranes: her water broke.

Call your local OB department and ask what to do if you think that your water has broken. You’ll be advised to seek an immediate hands-on examination by an obstetrician. The baby will be placed on a monitor to make sure it’s OK. Premature rupture of membranes can lead to life-threatening infection and premature delivery.

What did Sarah Palin do? She did NOT go to a local hospital and did NOT have her baby checked on a fetal monitor to make sure it was OK. She called her family practice doctor in Alaska for advice. What advice was given isn’t clear, but it’s clearly quoted that she "did not ask for a medical OK to fly". Whether it was OK to fly should be the FIRST question anyone considering traveling by air should have, if they were at all interested in protecting the life of the unborn. Regardless, she decided to give her speech at the conference without having any evaluation other than the long-distance advice of a family practitioner. Her speech was more important to her than making any effort to make sure her unborn child was OK. Then, she decided to fly back to Alaska, an 11-hour trip. In addition, she failed to inform flight personnel that her water had broken.

Airlines are unequipped to handle most emergencies at 30,000 feet, particularly the kind Palin put her unborn child at markedly increased risk for. These emergencies include birthing a premature infant or uncontrolled maternal bleeding. This was her FIFTH pregnancy and delivery can happen rapidly and unexpectedly. The baby or Palin could easily have died.

In the ADN article Palin downplays her decision to fly, implying traveling was reasonable as she wasn't in labor. If so, then why was she immediately hospitalized after returning to Alaska? Why was there an induced delivery of a 36-week infant by 6:30 am soon after her return? Again, ask any OB doctor. Induced delivery of a premature infant ALWAYS indicates a problem. The two most likely would be fetal infection, (a likely event given her failure to seek meaningful medical attention for her baby) or fetal distress by monitor.

Ask your OB doctor if the risks Palin took with the life of her unborn child are risks they would have advised for ANY reason. Then ask yourself whether Palin is truly pro-life, or only pro-Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
36. Please update here when you find out - hopefully before the Rethugs can alter info. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
24. If true
then comes under the category of "parents will do anything to protect their children".

Plus:Isn't it wonderful- we can elect a vp with a family as dysfunctional and crazy as the rest of America. See - she's just like "us".

Time to leave this to the National Enquirer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. It's true!
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:55 AM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
25. Anyone trying to end a pregnancy would have acted this way.
Its horrible to say but one should remember two things:

1). This child came to her late in life and was already a fragile situation. A friend in a similar situation had to lie on a couch for two six month periods during two pregnancies. When in the middle of a weak pregnancy, sometimes you have to be extraordinarily careful- not run around the country on a speaking tour.

2). This child was born prematurely. When her water broke, it was early- this was an emergency situation if she was twenty-two and her second child. She was in her 40's with a child already diagnosed as having problems. She did nothing to save this child.

All of that being said, the most important aspect of all of this in regards to Democratic politics and progressive ideology is that none of this is any of our damned business. We believe that these are too personal and private a situation to be fodder for governement intervention or public discussion. We believe that her decision, to keep or end this pregnancy is none of our business.

Her public "Anti-Choice" positions makes these unfortunate topics of conversation and blogging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
28. I just LOVE

all the defenders of Sarah Palin that are popping up on DU posts - gee, trying to snuff out another story dealing with Republican hypocrisy, are we? And puhleeze don't tell me we're too good for this. If the woman is a lying hypocrite we need to get the story out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
33. One aspect of the situation that hasn't been mentioned
If her water had broken as she said, and "leaking amniotic fluid" is the same thing, then infecrion is not the only complication that can arise from this situation.

In my labor and delivery class in nursing school it was drummed into us that the rupture of membranes is a possible medical emergency that must be addressed as soon as it happens so the mother and baby can be monitored for distress and or infection. Amniotic fluid cushions the baby and keeps the baby safe until delivery. A uterus without adequate amniotic fluid can compromise the baby's survival by making it more likely that the umbilical cord can get wrapped around the baby's neck or become compressed which would deprive the baby of oxygen. The fluid "floats" the cord and leaking fluid can present a serious situation if not monitored properly.

Palin should have gone to a hospital asap where she would have been hooked up to a fetal monitor which would show if the baby was getting enough oxygen or was going into distress. Any number of measures can be taken to correct the situation if the monitor shows fetal distress. Waiting 10 or 12 hours to get medical attention in another state accessible only by airplane was just plain stupid and irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
34. Broke her BAG of water? Is that a regional expression? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
37. They got one thing right: it's a "sleazy rumor"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
38. I'm glad the story is getting play, because no matter what happened
It calls into questions of her judgement and temperament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
39. Lets assume that the official story is true.
What Palin KNEW-

- She was having a high risk pregnancy

- It was complicated due to the fetus' Downs Syndrome


Yet, she took chances and engaged in risky behaviors -

- traveled extensively

- drank coffee (and alcohol?)

- continued to exercise vigorously

- lived in close proximity to a family member with a highly contagious disease


And when she was at the Governors' meeting in Texas -

- her water broke

- THEN she proceeded to give a half hour presentation

- After which she took an 11-hr flight back to Alaska


Did I miss anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC