Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why women should care very much whether the baby is Palin's:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:57 PM
Original message
Why women should care very much whether the baby is Palin's:


Because this is a woman who would force all other women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. So her own behaviors and attitudes toward unwanted pregnancy are critical. And we have a right to know how she deals with this crisis in her own life if, indeed, her daughter became pregnant outside of marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Medical records - we haven't seen McCain's or Biden's
either for that matter. And now we need to see Sarah's as well. Obama-Biden should release ALL their medical records including hospitalizations in the last ten years and push McCain and Palin to release their records of hospitalizations and ultrasound tests and lab tests and doctor's visits.

My bet is that not all the records were changed and that Bristol was hospitalized, not Sarah.
And that while her doctor might fudge the name on the records, not all the tests would have the wrong name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shey1218 Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. obama released his medical records along time ago
he's in excellent health

do a search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. When you want to be VP, there isn't anything that isn't our business.
Particularly when personal conduct may be illegal or unethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Weird irony of the day
when I clicke don this thread DU decided to give me an ad of a lady looking happily at her huge pregnancy bump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Huh. I get a link for an "addiction cure care center" ---I wonder for what?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. If this isn't her baby (and there is very good reason to believe it's not)
there are questions of ethics and honesty. Beyond that, there are questions of hypocrisy, since she wants to force other teenage women to go through what she wouldn't put her own daughter through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sidney J Mussburger Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Exactly
There is so much wrong with this story. I don't see how anyone can deny the importance of this. I've seen too many 'Stick to policy, not pregnancy' posts around here. This is a major story and can be easily debunked with just a picture of her clearly pregnant. I've yet to see said picture and doubt I ever will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. That is the EXACT issue.
It's the lying and the hypocrisy...not the underlying issue.]

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. attitudes that make it necessary to for a teenager to hide her pregnancy are harmful!
Those are the same attitudes that lead to teenagers giving birth to babies, alone in bathrooms and tossing the baby away. Hiding the pregnancy is like saying the pregnancy is shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Absolutely true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think it's worth looking into for someone who wants to spend the time
that person isn't me though. It would be a real shocker if true and certainly an end to any chances McCain had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am just going to throw this out to think about
The baby's medical problems have more to do with having parents who are older, rather than a younger parent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. True but also...what are the odds daughter pulled from school for 5 months during mom's last 5 month
of pregnancy? It's the combination of factors that makes me suspicious:

1. Mom hides pregnancy
2. Mom doesn't look pregnant AT ANY TIME in the pregnancy
3. Daughter pulled from school for 5 months
4. Picture of daughter with tummy protruding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Yup.


However....

If I see good confirmation that the daughter was out of school for mono leading up to the birth, that combined with the other circumstantial evidence would have me leaning towards the rumors being true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. CHILD CARE
She supposedly had the baby and came back to work within three days. Talk about "back in the fields before sundown!" Most women are out 6-8 weeks after a vaginal birth, even with no complications. Does she think that ALL women who have babies should go back to work that early? Also, who is taking care of the bundle of joy? It must be nice to be able to afford child care for a Down's Syndrome infant. It isn't going to play well with parents who are struggling to pay for child care.

Typical out-of-touch Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. Good points. Except...
I don't think the "back at work 4 days after childbirth" is so unlikely. What with hospitals discharging maternity patients within 24 hours, lots of women go home to domestic duties. These are usually _more_ physically demanding than a few hours of desk work would be. Not that this situation is ideal.. you need help with other kids and/or housework for a few weeks anyway, but not all women can get it. (Another reason we need more social services---which ONLY Democrats would think about the need for.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. She may have very well forced her own daughter to carry the baby to term...
against the daughter's wishes.
Look at the family portrait where the daughter is wearing green and is obviously pregnant. The expression on her face seems to reflect a combination of sadness and resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. This is the pic you're referring to. There is something disturbing about it, yes.


Look at how Bristol appears to be an outsider. The other four are almost enclosed in a circle. See Sarah's arm holding her other daughter's elbow? No one is touching Bristol, and she touches no one. She stands alone. Even the little girl in orange is leaning in towards the others.

Maybe it's not unusual for an adolescent girl to feel distant from her family, but the photo just disturbs me somewhat because the intent of the photo is to make them look like a close-knit family. I would almost guarandamn-tee you, they aren't.

Incidentally, Bristol is beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. I'd like to see the pic....
All I see in your post is a "Bandwidth Exceeded" message from photobucket. Instead of trying to embed it, would you provide a link? Thanks for any help you can give!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Is this the photo?
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 05:19 AM by Jim Lane
After posting my #20 asking for a link, I found what I think is the photo, on imageshack:

Is that the one you mean?

I can see your point about the postures, but it's also quite possible that it was more convenient for Palin to hold one daughter's elbow, as opposed to trying to throw her arm over the other daughter's shoulder. If they were concealing a pregnancy, you'd think she'd have gone out of her way to include Bristol in the one-big-happy-family imagery. For that matter, wouldn't they just have stood Piper (the youngest) in front of Bristol, to conceal her stomach?

The slight bulge is consistent with early-stage pregnancy but also with a bit of teenage chubbiness, at least to my untutored eye. It would be informative to know when this picture was taken.

Couldn't this all be resolved by a photo of the Governor taken shortly before the birth? There must have been enough official functions that she couldn't have dodged photographers forever. On the theory that she wasn't really the mother, did she go around wearing caftans concealing a taped-on pillow?

I can see how there's some circumstantial evidence for the charge of deception, but my gut tells me it's just too improbable. Some families have surely pulled this off but it would just be too hard for the Governor. Somebody at the hospital would've blabbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Sorry about the bandwidth; I cut and pasted someone else's "Properties."
I don't know when the "green sweater" pic was taken, so, cannot add to the narrative about possible pregnancy here.

Why didn't Sarah just slip her arm through the crook of her daughter's arm? That would be a natural thing to do. Something about this photo just bugs me, you can almost draw a circle around the outlines of the others.

People will definitely be looking for photos of Palin pre-birth of the baby, but you can bet no full-body pics of Bristol will surface. It's a crying shame that her life has been caught in America's moral woodchopper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I saw one report and I forget where that that photo is from
a year or so earlier than the time frame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. There is also a the issue of insurance fraud if she is passing the
child off as her son rather than admitting he is her grandson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. Pregnant minors are covered by insurance!
If Bristol Palin had given birth her maternity expenses would have been fully covered by her parents' insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Plus, as I've said, if she'll lie and stage cover-ups about giving birth,
what else will she lie and cover up for? We've had more than enough of lies and cover-ups these last 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. Let this go
please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. You know, if Palin were a man....
whose political/religious beliefs granted him the right (in his own mind) to tell men which reproductive/sexual choices you may make, you might feel differently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
23. OK. I'm confused. Her daughter has a baby, and Palin introduced both from the platform in PA
yesterday. So Palin is a new mother AND a new grandmother? No mention of her daughter's husband?

Or was I in the Twilight Zone yesterday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. Excellent, excellent point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. I agree.....
This is a woman who would tell the rest of us how to live our reproductive/sexual lives. That gives us the right to question her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC