|
...but there's one theory that, interestingly, nobody ever seems to advance.
So far the conventional wisdom seems to be that this is McCain's attempt to woo Hillary voters. I would imagine the average Hillary voter's response will be, "Hey. Asshole. HOW DUMB DO YOU THINK I AM?"
Seeing as protecting the right to choose is an issue that was kind of, uh, important to most of Hillary Clinton's supporters, picking an anti-choice evangelical is not the best way to court them. It's possible that McCain's people are too stupid, arrogant, or sexist to figure this out, and genuinely believe that Hillary's supporters will be too busy celebrating the fact that Palin has a uterus to wonder what a Palin presidency would mean about their right to control their own bodies. But my theory is that picking Palin was really a sop to the evangelicals, who are notoriously unenthusiastic about McCain despite all his other pandering, and that as far as disaffected Clinton voters go it's basically the political equivalent of a Hail Mary: it's a gamble that probably won't pay off, but what the hell, you've got nothing to lose.
However, I've now encountered several far more complicated theories about the strategy behind this choice--all still based on the assumption that McCain's handlers are somehow playing the gender card. I've heard the theory that McCain picked Palin figuring that the savaging she will shortly receive in the media, who as we know treat politically powerful women like crap, and from both the left and the right will stoke the simmering feminist outrage of Clinton's disappointed backers and inspire them to rally around their put-upon Republican sister. I've heard the theory that McCain picked Palin in order to make it impossible for Joe Biden to really take the gloves off during the VP debate; should he shred her the way he undoubtedly can, it'll only make him look like a big meanie for beating up on the poor woman. I've heard this theory, and I've heard that theory, but here's one theory I've not heard yet from anyone on the left OR on the right:
The theory that McCain picked Palin because he thought that, should she be called upon to do so, she'd make a good president.
*Nobody* who's talking about this pick is even paying lip service to the idea that McCain picked her because he thought she'd be good at the job. She's so unknown, so inexperienced, that her selection can *only* be explained in terms of political positioning. Someone here on the boards referred to her as "the Harriet Myers of VP picks," and I think that pretty much sums it up.
And it tells you something about this party that this is how they approached that selection. Sure, the VP pick is always partly about the electoral college and partly about attracting people to the ticket. But at least since Clinton, Democratic candidates have usually chosen someone who had actually been a viable candidate in his own right, thus taking seriously the possibility that something terrible might happen and that person might actually have to run the country. Democrats feel better knowing that they've got someone in that spot who wouldn't do the country too much damage if they had to step up.
Republicans apparently don't worry about that when they pick a VP. But they don't really worry about it when they pick a president either, so I guess it's to be expected.
Well, I'll give McCain this: his VP pick has strengthened marriage. Well, at least it's strengthened one marriage. My partner's sister is married to a Republican, and of course there's a certain amount of domestic disagreement as a result. But her husband's a fiscal Republican, not a Christian; and he apparently declared that he would not vote McCain if he put an evangelical on the ticket. So as of this morning, apparently, they're both Obama supporters. Thanks, McCain!
C ya,
The Plaid Adder
|