Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek's Alter: Why McCain's Veep Choice is Likely to Flop

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:09 PM
Original message
Newsweek's Alter: Why McCain's Veep Choice is Likely to Flop
McCain’s ‘Hail Sarah’ Pass
His choice for veep is all but set up for failure in the fall.
Jonathan Alter
Newsweek Web Exclusive
Updated: 5:18 PM ET Aug 29, 2008

Happy birthday, Johnny Mac! You're 72 now, a cancer survivor, and a presidential candidate who has said on many occasions that the most important criteria for picking a vice president is whether he or she could immediately step in if something happened to the president. Your campaign against Barack Obama is based on the simple idea that he is unready to be president. So you've picked a running mate who a year and a half ago was the mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, a town of 8,500 people. You've selected a potential leader of the free world who knows little or nothing about the major issues of the day beyond energy. Oh, and she's being probed in her state for lying and abuse of power.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's debut in Dayton on Friday was good political theater. She delivered a pitch-perfect speech (presumably written by McCain's ghost writer, Mark Salter) with a panache that suggests she could be a natural on the national stage. The well-kept secret of her selection let the GOP step on the story of Obama's boffo acceptance speech in Denver. It's not hard to see why she appealed to McCain: her middle-class roots; her older son headed for Iraq with the U.S. Army; her opposition to the earmarked "bridge to nowhere," which is arguably the only domestic issue that gets McCain excited. If camera-ready Palin helps McCain close the gender gap and win in November, she'll be history's hockey mom.

But there's a reason that rookies rarely score hat tricks. It's not her lack of name recognition; America loves a fresh face, especially one that's a cross between a Fox anchor and a character on "Northern Exposure," the old TV show about an Alaska town about the size of Wasilla. The problem is that politics, like all professions, isn't as easy as it looks. Palin's odds of emerging unscathed this fall are slim. In fact, she's been all but set up for failure.

"What is it exactly that the vice president does all day?" Palin offhandedly asked CNBC anchor Larry Kudlow in July. Kudlow explained that the job has become more important in recent years. Palin knows the energy crisis well, even if her claim on "Charlie Rose" that Alaska's untapped resources can significantly ease it is unsupported by the facts. But what does she know about Iranian nukes, health care or the future of entitlement programs? And that's just a few of the 20 or so national issues on which she will be expected to show basic competence. The McCain camp will have to either let her wing it based on a few briefing memos (highly risky) or prevent her from taking questions from reporters (a confession that she's unprepared). Either way, she's going to belly-flop at a time when McCain can least afford it.

Continue Reading: http://www.newsweek.com/id/156258
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, Alter is one of my favs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. setting something straight: Sarah was for the bridge to nowhere
in 2006 she said, yes, it is a good thing. go Ted and Don. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. its in the Anchorage daily news. www.adn.com

I can't find the link but its there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll bet McCain punked his own party on a dare ... he wanted Lieberman and they said x and he picked
Palin to watch them turn green (I guess I did see some Republicans turn blue, but it is rare).

So, fellow DU'ers do not fret ... she will resign for personal reasons soon enough and we'll get the REAL VP selection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I don't think the choice was ever Mc Cain's to make. The team is the same. Only the

Bush/Cheney et al are only changing the batting
order.

Mc Cain is to Bush as Dmitry Medvedev is to Putin,
a surrogate president or PINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Who do you think the real vp selection will be? Just curious. I have my own ideas. ;) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Likely??? "Likely to flop"???
:rofl:

If she gets sworn in, it goes in the "anything is possible" file.

And I have a feeling she has tremendous gaffe potential.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well stated article regarding what we know so far.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:22 PM by mzmolly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe they think Biden will go easy on her, out of pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Love that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Palin will be so easy to beat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's Why I Wouldn't Criticize the "What Does the VP Do" Question:
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:28 PM by Crisco
Different VPs have been called on for different things. Dick Cheney was called on for all the backroom dealing. Al Gore was given any number of tasks. Quayle was window dressing. Bush was another backroom dealer and .. shit, I can't even remember who Carter's veep was.

I read the question not as an indication of a bubble head, rather a simple statement that she wasn't going to say 'yes' or 'no' without first hearing how her role would be defined

I think she's been put forward as bait for the sexist media and netroots in an attempt to keep female Dems and independents home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. "her opposition to the earmarked "bridge to nowhere," Lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R. Thanks for posting this. Must read. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I agree except she had no panache, her voice was shrill and she had no charisma
Also, so what if her son is going to Iraq? So is Joe Biden's. McLoser's is already there as well as Jim Webb's. Funny she knows so little about Iraq or commented very little about it when asked in the past considering her son is going there. God, this woman is insulting. I actually wanted a real VP debate where the two candidates go over the issues. Sometimes the VP debate is actually more fun as they really try to attack each other's positions. But with air-head Palin it seems she might not even get some of the questions asked her. Can you imagine this woman yelling at Slobadan Milosevic and calling him a "thug". Joe did that. I can picture Hillary standing up to someone like that as well but Palin? Its laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. When Biden debates her
He damn well better not handle her with kid gloves. If we as women want equal treatment, then let it be equal in ALL ways. Would Biden go easy on a male candidate because of his gender? No way -- and no way should Palin get a pass because she has a uterus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Biden wouldn't go easy on Hillary either....
nor would I want him to treat her any differently. standards are standards.....regardless of gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooga booga Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Interesting that so many of us see Palin as a "Hail Mary" Pass
Barak Obama uped the ante on John McCain when he chose Joe Biden. McCain responds with Sarah Palin, so he's clearly playing to female voters in a way that's both clumsy and obvious. Hardly flattering to those women.

Looking back at VP running mate choices. I personally see very few that seem as strong as Barak Obama's choice of Joe Biden.

2004 - John Kerry chose John Edwards. Never liked him but he seemed to have hoped that the photogenic Southerner would help him. He didn't and Kerry didn't help himself all that much.

2000 - Al Gore chose Joe Lieberman. It didn't make sense to me then. It seems like an even bigger mistake now.

2000 and 2004 - Dick Cheney emerges from a weekend in Crawford, TX, and somehow goes from the chairman of the search committee to the VP running mate. Looks like he simply told Dubya that he was on the ticket.

1996 - Bob Dole picks Jack Kemp. That one seems a lot like the Sarah Palin choice. Doleful Bob Dole needs a spark for his campaign, and political Munchkin Kemp wasn't any help.

1992 and 1996 - Bill Clinton goes with Al Gore. I honestly think Clinton didn't need much help from Gore to win both times. Clinton carried almost the whole Mississippi Valley both times -- including Tennessee both times. In 2000, Gore couldn't even get his home state of Tennessee. If he had, Florida wouldn't have mattered

1988 - Michael Dukakis picks Lloyd Bentsen from Texas. There's a Hail Mary pass there. Bentsen had a shining moment in his debate with Dan Quayle, but he was never going to deliver Texas or save Dukakis' quixotic campaign.

1988 - George H.W. Bush picks Dan Quayle of Indiana. Bush didn't need any help to defeat Dukakis and he got none from Quayle.

1980 and 1984 - Ronald Reagan picked George H.W. Bush. Reagan's ability to construct his own personality cult was how he beat Jimmy Carter who looked weak and spent and, in 1984, Walter Mondale who just could overcome Reagan's charm and make his own case Bush mainly filled a slot, I think.

1984 - Walter Mondale selects Geraldine Ferraro. That was another "Hail Mary Pass" selection. Then, as now, it just looked too much like pandering to female voters.

1976 and 1980 - Jimmy Carter runs with Walter Mondale of Minnesota. It worked OK against the very weak Gerald Ford campaign in 1976, but they couldn't stop the Reagan tsunami in 1980. Mondale wasn't all that much help in either campaign.

1976 - Gerald Ford runs with Nelson Rockefeller of New York, the last of the Mohicans in the liberal wing of the GOP. It doesn't help. Carter's folksy charm is far more appealing.

1972 - Richard Nixon - Spiro Agnew / Nixon didn't need Agnew.
1972 - George McGovern - Sargent Shriver / Like Dukakis in 1988. This was a political Titanic and Nixon was the iceberg.

1968 - Richard Nixon - Spiro Agnew / I think Agnew just filled a slot. Nixon didn't even like him.
1968 - Hubert Humphrey - Edmund Muskie / I like Muskie, but he wasn't much help.

1954 - LBJ - Hubert Humphrey / LBJ didn't need help against Goldwater.
1964 - Barry Goldwater - ??? Miller / GOP was on its ass. Goldwater was reluctant to even run.

1960 - JFK - Lyndon Johnson / Here's a VP choice that actually mattered. LBJ was helpful in securing Texas and the South for JFK's slender victory. They famously despiced each other though.
1960 - Richard Nixon picks Henry Cabot Lodge / Lodge wasn't any help.

So, it seems to me that only JFK's pick of LBJ in 1960 ACTUALLY had much of a positive effect. The Hail Marys like Geraldine Ferraro in 1984 and Lloyd Bentsen in 1988 were flops as Hail Marys usually are. John McCain has just flung another one into play in his bid to counteract Barak Obama's vivid personality and appeal. It would have been a good idea to bet on Obama a week ago at Caesar's Palace in Vegas, because you'd have locked in better odds than they'll give you today. Obama may not get all that much of a lift from Biden, but he probably doesn't even need it. However, I honestly think Joe Biden brings more to the campaign than any other VP candidate from either party since LBJ in 1960.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. One big difference here
is that in modern political history the likelihood that the VP would need to assume the presidency was seen as fairly low except in a case of assassination or accident. In McCain's case, given his age and health history, the possibility that Palin will become president is a very real (and scary) one. I read somewhere that actuarial figures for McCain don't even project he'd survive two terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Somewhere on here is a link that showed that she was for the bridge before she was against it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Alter's concluding statement contradicts most of his article...

"More likely, this "Hail Sarah" pass won't do much to help John McCain get into the end zone. He'll win or lose for other reasons."

------

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. Palin is probably the worst VP pick in US history. Worse even than Dan Quale. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
22. This is such a cynical pick.
I get why the religious right wing conservatives will like her. They don't care about the country, only reinforcing their narrow beliefs. But thinking that dem women will vote for her just because she is a woman? Insulting! The pubs are so flat out of fresh ideas to woo voter with that I guess this is the best they could come up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. Is the corporate media going to interview her?
When? I love Alter's article, but he assumes that the media is going to ask her tough questions. I'm not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC