Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uh-Oh, " Palin is lying" Says: Canned Alaska Public Safety Commissioner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:42 PM
Original message
Uh-Oh, " Palin is lying" Says: Canned Alaska Public Safety Commissioner
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 08:46 PM by kpete
08.29.08 -- 9:07PM

Exclusive: Chief Fired by Palin Speaks Out

The Post's James Grimaldi got an exclusive interview with Walter Monegan, the canned Alaska Public Safety Commissioner at the center of Palin trooper-gate scandal. And he basically says Palin is lying in her assertion that while some of her aides contacting Monegan about firing her brother-in-law, that she herself did not.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2008/08/exclusive_chief_fired_by_palin.html?hpid=topnews

The key passage ...

Monegan, 57, a respected former chief of the Anchorage Police Department, said in an interview with The Washington Post's James V. Grimaldi on Friday that the governor repeatedly brought up the topic of her ex-brother-in-law, Michael Wooten, after Monegan became the state's commissioner of public safety in December 2006. Palin's husband, Todd, met with Monegan and presented a dossier of information about Wooten, who was going through a bitter custody battle with Palin's sister, Molly. Monegan also said Sarah Palin sent him e-mails on the subject, but Monegan declined to disclose them, saying he planned to give them to a legislative investigator looking into the matter.

Palin initially denied that she or anyone in her administration had ever pressured Monegan to fire the trooper, but this summer acknowledged more than a half a dozen contacts over the matter, including one phone call from a Palin administration official to a state police lieutenant. The call was recorded and was released by Palin's office this month. Todd Palin told a television reporter in Alaska that he did meet with Monegan, but said he was just "informing" Monegan about the issue, not exerting pressure.

"She never directly asked me to fire him," Monegan said.


Okay, so first Palin claims there was no pressure. Then she learns of these calls. And while many of them are entirely appropriate, some are not. And she can see that the "serial nature of the contacts could be perceived as some kind of pressure, presumably at my direction."

And yet, according to Monegan, she herself was doing exactly the same thing she later professed to be so shocked that others were doing. So how credible is it that she wasn't directing her staff to pressure Monegan when she was doing the same thing herself? And what difference does it even make? It seems quite clear that all of this emanated from Palin and that she was actively in it. So she abused her power as governor and then almost certainly lied about her involvement. Why did McCain pick her?

--Josh Marshall

more at:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/211524.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R! Get it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Who will rid me of this troublesome ex-brother-in-law?"
Didn't I hear something like that before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's a perfect republican. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's that she used improper channels and then lied about it
If half of what is being said about her ex-brother-in-law is true he deserved to be fired as did anyone protecting him should have been. BUT, there is a proper way to do it and Palin seems to have acted like a real republican by ignoring them.
It will be a non-starter with the die hard vote against themselves republicans because they see that as acceptable. There side has no rules and they love when they break rules and laws and rub the democrats nose in it. Palin could have slit someones throat and as long as the dead person was a democrat it wouldn't make on bit of difference to the far right - no matter their "religious" persuasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. he's a dork but half of what was said of wooten was said by the
palins and they are liars, right? Right. The charges were investigated, unfounded and all but two were dropped. he was appropriately disciplined on the two. This is why she DID THIS. If she can't get her way one way, she will get it another. she will be sorry she agreed to be vp. all her dirty underwear is coming out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Doesn't it remind you of someone? People who corrupt our system of justice
for revenge and political purpose? HMMM...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. yeah. its scary how fast some people will rationalize things isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. what does she think about McCain's voting AGAINST the Violence Against Women Act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Get out! A republican that lies? Really? I can't believe in less than
12 hours the crap that has been pull up and revealed on her.

She was never on our radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because he makes stupid moves and has
no better judgment than a slug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaforObama Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Shuster
Shuster was all over this story on MSNBC. He interviewed him on the air tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I heard that. It does not bode well for her. Reporters are smelling blood about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. So she's a true McCainiac is she? Ready to lie any time. Well K&R !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. because she is just like bush?
and he could smell home on her?

oh! another executive privilege claimant! great! let's go shoot a moose, glass ceiling barbie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC