2. They think that Democrats now can't say a word about her inexperience
because it will point to Obama. One would think that would work both ways. They can't say anything about Obama because the person they have a heartbeat away has none at all.
Meanwhile they pretend that Obama suddenly appeared fully grown in 2004, and did nothing before. He was in the state legislature. He was a community organizer. What has SHE done exactly?
3. I heard it said that the Republicans will consider it a trade off:
Our inexperienced presidential candidate for their inexperienced vice presidential candidate. One big difference here is that Barack Obama ran in the primaries and millions of people got to vote as to whether they consider him experienced enough to be president. Nobody has yet been able to cast a vote as to whether they believe that Palin is experienced enough to be president. Nobody. Game over.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.