Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Alleged spy worked in the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:15 PM
Original message
WP: Alleged spy worked in the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans!
Edited on Fri Aug-27-04 09:27 PM by flpoljunkie
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40004-2004Aug27.html

<>Pentagon officials sought to minimize the significance of any sensitive information the suspect individual may have wrongfully passed. "The Defense Department has been cooperating with the Justice Department on this matter for an extended period of time," the Pentagon said in a statement issued last night. "The investigation involves a single individual at DOD at the desk officer level, who was not in a position to have significant influence over U.S. policy. Nor could a foreign power be in a position to influence U.S. policy through this individual. To the best of DOD's knowledge, the investigation does not target any other DOD individuals."

Even so, the case is likely to attract intense attention because the official being investigated works under William J. Luti, deputy under secretary of Defense for Near East and South Asian Affairs. Luti oversaw the Pentagon's "Office of Special Plans," which conducted some of the early policy work for the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Some critics of the Bush administration have accused that office of distorting intelligence about Iraq in order to improve the case for going to war by arguing that Saddam Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda were much more closely linked than the intelligence community believed.

Luti reports to Undersecretary for Policy Douglas Feith, who in turn reports to Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. The plot thickens
Goddamm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think this story will get much bigger than this description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think it will touch Dick Cheney
maybe too soon now for news reports to go there...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rummy-->Wolfie-->Feith-->Luti-->SPY
Holy shit the neo-cons are going down!! At last!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Who could it be?
Schulsky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. where is Karen Kwiatkowski?? she'd know the dirt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. And AIPAC is involved in this.
Man, The old Chinese curse "May you live in interesting times" just came down hard on the neo-cons.

I wonder if any of this has anything to do with the McGreevey-Cipel matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichDem10 Donating Member (644 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Now we know why...
Bush signed orders for intelligence reform today. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040828/ap_on_go_pr_wh/intelligence_reform&cid=544&ncid=716

Let's put the pieces together.

1)New CIA director to start cover up

2)Greater power to CIA director to continue cover up

3)Senate Intelligence Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kansas, on Sunday proposed breaking up the CIA and removing several intelligence agencies from the Pentagon (DOD)= COVER UP!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mother Jones article links this group to Scooter Libby and Cheney ...
Below is a part of the extensive Mother Jones article on the Office of Special Plans. Sounds like this goes right to Scooter Libby and Dick Cheney. WOW!!!

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2004/01/12_405.html

As the momentum for war began to build in early 2002, Wolfowitz and Feith beefed up the intelligence unit and created an Iraq war-planning unit in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia Affairs section, run by Deputy Undersecretary of Defense William Luti, under the rubric "Office of Special Plans," or OSP; the new unit's director was Abram N. Shulsky. By then, Wurmser had moved on to a post as senior adviser to Undersecretary of State John Bolton, yet another neocon, who was in charge of the State Department's disarmament, proliferation, and WMD office and was promoting the Iraq war strategy there. Shulsky's OSP, which incorporated the secret intelligence unit, took control, banishing veteran experts‚ -- including Joseph McMillan, James Russell, Larry Hanauer, and Marybeth McDevitt‚ -- who, despite years of service to NESA, either were shuffled off to other positions or retired. For the next year, Luti and Shulsky not only would oversee war plans but would act aggressively to shape the intelligence product received by the White House.

Both Luti and Shulsky were neoconservatives who were ideological soul mates of Wolfowitz and Feith. But Luti was more than that. He'd come to the Pentagon directly from the office of Vice President Cheney. That gave Luti, a recently retired, decorated Navy captain whose career ran from combat aviation to command of a helicopter assault ship, extra clout. Along with his colleague Colonel William Bruner, Luti had done a stint as an aide to Newt Gingrich in 1996 and, like Perle and Wolfowitz, was an acolyte of Wohlstetter's. "He makes Ollie North look like a moderate," says a NESA veteran.

Shulsky had been on the Washington scene since the mid-1970s. As a Senate intelligence committee staffer for Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, he began to work with early neoconservatives like Perle, who was then an aide to Senator Henry Jackson. Later, in the Reagan years, Shulsky followed Perle to the Pentagon as Perle's arms-control adviser. In the '90s, Shulsky co-authored a book on intelligence called Silent Warfare, with Gary Schmitt. Shulsky had served with Schmitt on Moynihan's staff and they had remained friends. Asked about the Pentagon's Iraq intelligence "cell," Schmitt‚ -- who is currently the executive director of the Project for the New American Century‚ -- says that he can't say much about it "because one of my best friends is running it."

According to Lt. Colonel Kwiatkowski, Luti and Shulsky ran NESA and the Office of Special Plans with brutal efficiency, purging people they disagreed with and enforcing the party line. "It was organized like a machine," she says. "The people working on the neocon agenda had a narrow, well-defined political agenda. They had a sense of mission." At NESA, Shulsky, she says, began "hot-desking," or taking an office wherever he could find one, working with Feith and Luti, before formally taking the reins of the newly created OSP. Together, she says, Luti and Shulsky turned cherry-picked pieces of uncorroborated, anti-Iraq intelligence into talking points, on issues like Iraq's WMD and its links to Al Qaeda. Shulsky constantly updated these papers, drawing on the intelligence unit, and circulated them to Pentagon officials, including Rumsfeld, and to Vice President Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soopercali Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good story from Common Dreams a few weeks ago...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0807-02.htm

WASHINGTON - An ad hoc office under U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith appears to have acted as <b>the key base for an informal network of mostly neo-conservative political appointees that circumvented normal inter-agency channels to lead the push for war against Iraq.</b>

The Office of Special Plans (OSP), which worked alongside the Near East and South Asia (NESA) bureau in Feith's domain, was originally created by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Paul Wolfowitz to review raw information collected by the official U.S. intelligence agencies for connections between Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.

***
Other appointees who worked with them in both offices included Michael Rubin, a Middle East specialist previously with the neo-conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI); David Schenker, previously with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP); Michael Makovsky; an expert on neo-con icon Winston Churchill and the younger brother of David Makovsky, a senior WINEP fellow and former executive editor of pro-Likud 'Jerusalem Post'; and Chris Lehman, the brother of the John Lehman, a prominent neo-conservative who served as secretary of the navy under Ronald Reagan, according to Kwiatkowski.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I guess this is why we got the Friday dump about "miscalculation"
from Bush re: the Iraq war......covering his butt, he hopes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. I guess this is why we got the Friday dump about "miscalculation"
from Bush re the Iraq war....trying to cover his butt, preemptively....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. good point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. WHY DID ISRAEL....
NEED A SPY IN THE PENTAGON WHEN YOU HAVE PEOPLE LIKE PEARLE AND WOLFOWITZ ALREADY THERE?


sorry about the caps....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaintLouisBlues Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hopefully the OSP fiasco will finally be scrutinized
But what about this from the WP article?:

"The investigation involves a single individual at DOD at the desk officer level, who was not in a position to have significant influence over U.S. policy. Nor could a foreign power be in a position to influence U.S. policy through this individual. To the best of DOD's knowledge, the investigation does not target any other DOD individuals."

Round Up the Usual Low-Level Suspects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. There's a reason they're called the bush CARTEL
Edited on Fri Aug-27-04 10:41 PM by LynnTheDem
1. "traveled to Paris for a secret meeting with Manucher Ghorbanifar, an Iranian arms dealer who had been a central figure in the Iran-contra affair."

Oh yes. Let's bring up Iran-Contra and bushCartel involvement to that scandal. They never did get what they deserved for that.

2. Johnson @MSNBC is saying this involves that Presidential duty under oath speech bush gave called the State of the Uranium.

Aka the forged Niger documents that bowels may have known about, but no bushCartel brains knew. That memo? Look! CODE PINK!

3. Let's finally expose OSP, as Sid and Seymour have been doing the past 2 years, to show just how much, in fact, bush DID lie this country (well, the dumb half, any rate) to war.

Josh Marshall from Talking Points Memo said he's been working on something with the SOTUA and the forgeries that would "shake the teutonic plates of Washington". :)

4. Where did Ahmen "THANKS SUCKERS! Chalabi, Iranian spy extraordinaire disappear to?

5. How many lies, deaths, murders, torturings, abuses, outing of NOCs, passings on of classified info, illegal campaigns, smeared veterans does it take to equal one blowjob and 2 consenting adults?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. And unlike on a rightwingnut board...
I bet not one single progressive fainted in shock, with their delicate sensibilities, at the word BLOWJOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Well , if Iran-Contra is any precedent
More felons resulted from Iran Contra than any other time in the presidency, although there were an equal amount of Reagan-Bush administration members who were convicted in good old corruption cases as well.

Probably spent 1/10 the money of what we spent just on Whitewater to get something like 20 times the convictions.

So in light of this, I think there will probably be a few more bodies piled up before anyone gets their knickers in a knot in DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC