Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Poll: Minnesota Kerry 48% Bush 44%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:22 PM
Original message
New Poll: Minnesota Kerry 48% Bush 44%
Rasmussen is starting a new wave of state wide polls and Minnesota is the first entry.

Kerry is ahead by a 48-44 percent margin. Last month, the democrat has a 7-point lead. Still, the real story is that the incumbent president is pulling only 44% and is running below what he received percentage wise in 2000. Kerry is pulling about what Gore got. Remember that Minnesota was closer than expected in 2000 due to Ralph Nader being on ballot.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. My fellow Minnesotans may be coming around.
I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaolinmonkey Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. C'mon Minnesota. If you go for Kerry, I'll wear a Vikings jersey
(and I'm a Packer fan)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good news!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Maybe I am a....
pestimistic person but Minnesota should be a safer state than 48-44....this may mean that Kerry will have to waste his time and visit Minnesota and take away time from the "swing states."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Minnesota
was always considered a swing state. It's demographics have changed radically over the years. Remember that ass wipe Norm Coleman is from that state. They also elected a republican governor a few years ago.

Gore won it by less than 3%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I consider it a swing state now
but in presidential elections since 1960 it has only gone Republican once--in 1972, and even then George McGovern received well over his national average and nearly beat Nixon there with 48% of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. that is my point....
Minnesota is suppose to be a safe dem state when it comes to the presidential elections....and a Kerry 48-44 lead is not good enough....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. We will work ourselves to the nub for Kerry, you betcha!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't Nader on the ballot again?
Edited on Fri Aug-27-04 03:31 PM by fujiyama
The state will be close again but I think Kerry will carry it in the end.

I'm more worried about IA and WI. Gore won those both by less than 5,000 votes each I think (well less than 5,000 for IA and just a little more than 5,000 for WI - very similar margins). It sucks that Nader is on both state ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. And this could've been done before any Swift Boat backlash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Show up in the state every other day and it ain't going to help
when you are a moran like Bush*. He's mananged to be here 3 times in the last few weeks, Dick has been here and so has Pickles - it wain;t doing the trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Concentrate on Bush's number...that is the key
It isn't really important what Kerry is polling right now. These polls are getting close because voters are moving between Kerry and undecided. Bush has not picked up any significant support in months. Kerry is going to get most of these voters in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Very good point elmer
I don't see Nader being much of a factor in MN this year. David Cobb MIGHT be a factor, but he (or the MN Greens) have not been campaigning much here this year, as there's no other statewide election (like there was in 2000). My prediction: Kerry will take Minnesota easily, and the Democrats will gain a few state house seats, and possibly one congressional seat (Patty Wetterling).

It's funny though....I've seen THREE of those "W '04" stickers on the back of Mercedes on I-94 between Mpls and St Paul in the last week. But who gives a damn about the social contract anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. CNN was gleefully reporting these advances for dubya today.
They were grinning the whole time and tying it to the effect the Swift Boat ads had. So the slimmy bastards got their way!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Look at the fine print....how they're getting the numbers...!
Edited on Fri Aug-27-04 03:41 PM by Gloria


Looks like it is likely voters, done August 1-26 (500 a night) with a
+/- 5 MOE. (Total of 13,000 voters)

That means it includes all of the SB attacks....but only a smaller sampling from the most recent negative stories about the SBers.....The Premium subscribers get the 7 day rolling average, which would show the trends....we aren't see that!! And they are apparently have trouble getting "adequate" sampling....



Here's the fine print:


This data has been compiled from a national telephone survey of 13,000 Likely Voters conducted by Rasmussen Reports from August 1-26, 2004. Each night, 500 interviews with Likely Voters were conducted. National results for the survey during that time frame show that President Bush and Senator Kerry each attracted 45% of the vote. State-by-state samples carry a margin of error that varies from +/- 3 percentage points to +/- 5 percentage points depending upon the state. Data for California, Texas, and New York carries a 3 percentage point margin of error. For Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan, the margin of error is +/- 4 percentage points. For all other states, the margin of error is +/- 5 percentage points. In all cases, the margin of error is expressed with a 95% level of confidence. In some states, oversampling and supplemental interviews were used to obtain an adequate sample size for reporting purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC