Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama supporters flooded Sinclair Broadcasting with 93k emails threatening to boycott over Ayers ad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:28 AM
Original message
Obama supporters flooded Sinclair Broadcasting with 93k emails threatening to boycott over Ayers ad

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26415445/

<snip>

Pro-Obama e-mail flood

More than 93,000 pro-Obama e-mails have flooded Sinclair Broadcasting Group stations that are running the ad, many of them threatening to boycott the stations and their advertisers. Obama campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor warned that other stations that accept the ad can expect the same response.

Efforts to stop the Ayers ad have not come only from the Obama campaign. A film company in Berkeley, Calif., that made an Oscar-nominated documentary in 2004 on the Weather Underground group has issued a cease-and-desist letter to the American Issues Project, saying that it illegally appropriated copyright images from the film for the ad. Brook Dooley, an attorney for the Free History Project, said shots of Ayers speaking into a camera in an interview and the aftermath of a Weather Underground bombing were copyrighted. The group has informed about 150 stations in Ohio and Michigan of its objection, but Dooley said no decisions have been made about legal action.

Separately, a new effort by Democratic strategist Tom Matzzie, called Accountable America, is aimed at warning conservative donors of the legal thicket they may be entering by financing independent attack ads like the Ayers spot. He said his group's first target is Simmons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, NYC-ers! Don't forget Salem's latest radio entity: WNYM, The Apple
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 11:35 AM by no_hypocrisy
on 97 AM in Hackensack, New Jersey.

http://am970theapple.townhall.com/

Sinclair doesn't have exclusive license to run these spots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent!!
Now, this is what I like to see. :D

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Boycotts. Hear that DU?
How many times have we tried to organize a boycott, only for a select group of DU naysayers to tell us they don't work.

Well Yes They Do and Yes We Can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. AGREED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Completely agree!!
Seems to me a certain bus boycott worked etremely well. But, it didn't happen overnight.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. They work extremely well in certain case and fail in others. Don't use a screw driver to drive nails
etc.

Many well organized boycotts have succeeded, and many poorly organized and poorly targeted boycotts have failed. Even some well targeted and and well organized boycotts have failed.

Actually the article has little to do with boycotts and a lot to do with Obama's strategy for combating 'swift boating.'

The article says absolutely nothing about the effectiveness of any boycott. There is nothing reported about any station or channel altering their behavior in response to any boycott.

In fact the article doesn't even claim a boycott is occurring. It says there is a letter writing campaign. Some writing letters are threatening boycott.

So to use this article to promote the idea that boycotts are always effective no matter what is plain silliness.

Hear that?

There is a lesson there somewhere, if only people would study the lessons before they cry boycott in reaction to any and every outrage.

I personally believe the Obama campaign is wise to respond with ads in the same markets and to push people to write letters. I also believe the campaign is wise to have not called for a boycott so far.

Boycotting a TV channel isn't something I expect the Obama campaign wants to do for the next 2 months.

Boycotts work great in certain circumstances and they fail miserably in other situations. Understanding how and why boycotts work or don't is key to deciding whether to implement the tool in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. On schedule
STFU unless you're calling someone to threaten to boycott.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Say what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Where do we click to protest in solitarity? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Here's some phone numbers
http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group#Media_markets

I don't have a Sinclair station in my area, but here's the list if you live in one of these markets.

Teresa Heinz said to target the major shareholders if you really want to shake things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I just moved to their market five minutes ago. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. I called an left a voice mail @ Sinclair-FOX and their ABC Affiliate Wsyx in Ohio
Here are phone #'s for Central OH folks interested in doing the same:

WTTE (L)
Fox
28 / 36
(614) 481-6666
WSYX
ABC
6 / 13
(614) 481-6666

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. IMHO, it's not the threat of boycotting that gets immediate results.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 11:54 AM by IanDB1
What creates the effect is the overwhelming tide of people using a "threat of boycott" as a pretext for making an unmanageable volume of phone calls to the company.

I'm not saying that boycotts are ineffective in the long run.

But, in the short-term, what matters is getting enough people contacting them, so that you outstrip their capacity to deal with the problem. Eventually, the "benefit" of being a douchebag is outweighed by the inconvenience of dealing with the backlash.

When important messages are missed because voice-mail boxes are full.

When they have to hire two or three temps just to handle your phone calls.

When they have to pay a Public Relations hack $300 an hour to consult with them on the issue.

When the protesters start calling the company's Public Relations agency about it, who then charge their client $300 an hour for taking the calls.

When receptionists grumble and gripe during lunch, or cry on their boss' desks, when important meetings are interrupted by a protester on the phone pretending to be someone they are not, when the sheer weight of the protest creates Virtual Attrition that hampers the company's ability to function at the smallest levels-- THAT is what gets the short-term results.


We learned this lesson early in the "Stop Doctor Laura" campaign.

VOLUME.

I'm not a lawyer, but this is how we were trained during the Stop Dr. Laura campaign:

You are legally allowed to call someone at a business once every 8 hours, for legitimate purposes, before it becomes harassment.

That means if you have phone numbers for ten different people at a company, you can call each of those 10 people once every 8 hours. That's 10 calls per 8 hour period.

The more people you can get contact information for, the more times you can call the company (once per person) per shift.

If you call at 9:00 AM, and someone is working late after 5 PM, you get to call them twice that day.

Be careful not to make the same mistake I made with Tom DeLay's office. He had three different phone numbers, in three different area codes listed, which were all answered by the same, single person who threatened to refer me to The Capitol Police. Watch out for that. Make sure you are actually speaking to different people.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NatBurner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. sweet
love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Remember - Sinclair Broadcasting Brought Us Stolen Honor Smear in 2004...
A month before the 2004 election to smear Kerry. Of course, they are at it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Target The Local Advertisers...
Sadly all the letter is the world to these goons will get circular filed (and hope they do...more on that to follow). The people could care less about the "sheeple"...you're only numbers, what WILL get their attention is a phone call from a "concerned" advertiser...especially one that has gotten a lot of negative feedback (protestors, phone calls and blog postings) due to their association with the station. The more local the better...car dealers, for example, spend a wad on these places and a threat to that revenue is sure to get some attention.

Another action is for people to send registered letters, including a return receipt (so you know the station received the letter) and specify not only your complaint with the station but demand this letter be placed in the station's Public Inspection File. Then pay a visit to the station and demand to see your letter. The station must allow you access to the file...not only for your letter, but for others as well. If they refuse, they have violated a major FCC rule and face a hefty fine...having that return receipt is pretty damning.

Sinclair is skating on some thin ice these days...like many other broadcast companies...Their stock has lost 50% of their value and are flirting with being de-listed...

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=SBGI#chart2:symbol=sbgi;range=1y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

Nothing would feel better than to see this company, Salem and several others that have abused the public airwaves have to file for bankruptcy.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC