Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul and James on CNN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:34 PM
Original message
Paul and James on CNN
Edited on Fri Aug-22-08 04:34 PM by iamthebandfanman
saying how awful and disrespectful it is that Clinton isnt 'on the short list' and how itll help those puma people...


jesus, could we please send them some cheese to have with that whine?


heres an idea guys... dont make a big deal about it and it wont help anybody! yeah, you agreeing with their sentiments surely helps.

then they both follow the discussion up with "well we dont know she wasnt on the VP short list"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. what a coincidence. I read that Wolfson was the same on Fox.
Seriously, how do these people know anything? They just seem to be stirring up poop at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honestly, not vetting Clinton or even to go through the motions would be stupid
Edited on Fri Aug-22-08 04:40 PM by tokenlib
If this is true, the Obama campaign blundered. I know a lot of you say the hell with Hillary--but she deserved to be vetted and respected. So I hope this is not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well, specifically because Obama himself said she'd be on anybody's short list. They could have at
least went through the motions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. politico says she wasn't vetted, NYT said she was.
Others said that she was already vetted in the primaries. I wouldn't take anything that random "democratic sources" are saying seriously. Hell, certain "democratic sources" are still claiming that Al Gore still has a shot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree. And I also tend not to trust Politico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Clintons wouldn't respect the vetting process. They refused early on to allow Bill's dealings
to be vetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. The don't know she's not on the short list,
but they know how awful and disrespectful Obama is for not having her on it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. seriously. And even if she WAS vetted, what makes them think that they would know?
Some reports have said she was vetted, some have said that she wasn't vetted. And many Clinton people like Paul and James had been telling us how she didn't NEED to be vetted since she's the most vetted politician in American. I am sick of these people projecting bc of a report on fucking repuke politico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Carville was complaining Clinton wasn't 'consulted' about the VP.
Is that a prerequisite? And he doesn't even really know. Most annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. What a blast from the past these guys are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC