Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

These national polls are meaningless. Look at the States to see the true picture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:30 PM
Original message
These national polls are meaningless. Look at the States to see the true picture
Edited on Wed Aug-20-08 04:44 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter


http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Pres/Maps/Aug20.html

That's the true picture. The state polls are the same as the national polls.

Now could folk here please stop deriding everyone who perceives a problem as a concern troll, chicken-little, hand-wringer, weak-sister, scairdy cat, panicker, PUMA, whiner, or defeatist?

Everyone here is going to vote for Obama whether he is up, down or tied. It is more than reasonable for people in a political discussion forum to note and discuss obvious campaign developments. Maybe Obama will be up a million points next month, and then we will discuus that development.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. My state-Ohio has McCain supposedly ahead in the polls but when you consider
that virtually no Dem who voted for Kerry would ever vote for McCain, there are Republicans who have crossed over to the Dems (I have personally met some), The Obama campaign has a huge Voter Registration program (AND I HEARD AT A BOE MACHINE ALLOCATION HEARING THAT TRADITIONALLY ~70% OF NEWLY REGISTERED VOTERS ACTUALLY VOTE-A HIGHER NUMBER THAN ACTIVE REGISTERED NUMBERS) hundreds of thousands were disenfranchised in Ohio in '04 that won't this time since we have a Dem SOS not Blackwell-I have to ask how could McCain be ahead? I call BS.

I think it sounds like a way to explain away another stolen election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I won't be surprised if Obama wins Ohio.
I have never predicted he would lose the election. I expect him to win.

But I think he has gone from a 85% chance to a 60% chance. Few Dem candidates have ever had a 60% chance, so that's good, but 85% is better.

I believe his local organization efforts are excellent and provide a good cushion. But if the national narrative gets away from a candidate that swamps all the GOTV, registration, organization, etc.

For all I know Walter Mondale may have had better ground assets than Reagan in '84, but since he never got outside his base on a national perception level it wouldn't make a difference. So the big picture matters also.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC