Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Caffetry wants to know if Obama should "go negative" on Grampy McBush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:41 PM
Original message
CNN: Caffetry wants to know if Obama should "go negative" on Grampy McBush
August 20, 2008
Polls tighten, should Obama go negative?
Posted: 02:09 PM ET



http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/20/polls-tighten-should-obama-go-negative/

FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:

The polls indicate the presidential race is tightening.

CNN’s latest poll of polls shows Barack Obama leading John McCain by just one point — 45 to 44 percent. That’s down from a 3-point lead in yesterday’s average of polls and down considerably from a few weeks ago.

While Obama was vacationing in Hawaii last week — McCain had the stage almost all to himself. Suddenly the Russians rolled into Georgia and McCain was in the catbird seat. Also some of McCain’s negative ads — a la Paris Hilton and Britney Spears “celebrity” spot — seem to have resonated with voters. And it looks like McCain made inroads with some members of the Republican base with his interview at Rick Warren’s church.

All of this creates a problem for Barack Obama who has gone out of his way to run a positive campaign based on the issues, and for the most part has chosen not to engage in the schoolyard stuff that characterizes U.S. politics. He may no longer have that luxury.

Obama is now out with some hard-hitting tv ads running in local markets in key battleground states. He spent 400-thousand dollars on Sunday alone to run two negative spots — more than 600 times — focusing on the economy and McCain… in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Florida.

These new ads have been complemented with a tougher tone on the stump where Obama is going after McCain for saying Iraqis would greet Americans as liberators and for challenging Obama’s patriotism.

Some Democratic strategists say Obama’s aggressive tone reflects the reality of the race and say he should have gotten tougher sooner.

Here’s my question to you: In light of tightening polls, does Barack Obama have to go negative against John McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. He already has...... in ads that are running in battleground states...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cafferty has been pretty tough on McCain lately - one of the few on CNN who will go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. BO doesn't need to go "negative", all he has to do
is tell the truth about Grampy McShits' policies and how they are 95% identical to the failed policies of His Chimperial Majesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Voters deserve to know the truth about McCain
And if Republicans want to call that negative, too bad for them. If running honest, negative ads help elect Obama, then run a million of them. Our country cannot take another 4 years of McCain/Bush/NeoCon policy. Neither can the world.

Republicans don't understand anything but fighting fire with fire. We have a far better candidate than they do, and everybody needs to know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about simply telling the truth
in no uncertain terms and repeating it over and over with all of the money folks have given to the campaign?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep.. Just "go honest". And fast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC