Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On last night's forum, did you catch the part where McCain came out against unions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 01:31 PM
Original message
On last night's forum, did you catch the part where McCain came out against unions?
Edited on Sun Aug-17-08 01:33 PM by hedgehog
WE MUST PRESERVE THE PRIVACY OF ALL OF OUR

7 CITIZENS AS MUCH POSSIBLE BECAUSE THAT’S ONE OF THE

8 FUNDAMENTAL AND BASIC RIGHTS WE HAVE. AND BY THE WAY,

9 INCLUDING A SECRET BALLOT FOR UNION ORGANIZERS, A SECRET

10 BALLOT, NOT A BALLOT THAT SOMEONE COMES AROUND AND SIGNS

11 YOU UP, THAT’S A DIFFERENT SUBJECT.

http://thepage.time.com/partial-transcript-of-saddleback-forum/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. didn't even sound accurate to me - just "unions are not democratic!!!!!11" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes-!! and as thinking that
"the enemy" has all kinds of high tech communications advantages over the US- very FISA friendly.

Here in NH there have been a bunch of anti-union ads, with a McCain flavor to them. ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, but it doesn't read that way to me.
It sounds like he said people should be able to vote on whether or not to have a union at their workplace via secret ballot rather than having the employer sending goons around and intimidating people. And also not having the unions send their goons to force people to sign up.

If I'm reading this right, I agree with him on that.

But we all know he's not fighting to protect the basic rights and privacy of citizens. It was all just a lot of talk and lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think it was actually a really clever example of telegraphing different things to different groups
It plays to rabid anti-union outsourcers by making it seem that they won't let union organizers use peer pressure to intimidate the weak into their communist scheme.

It plays to union organizers by making it seem that their activities are being protected and that they're being allowed "private" contact with workers to pitch their plan out of the spotlight of corporate scrutiny.

It plays to the grand old American mythic cowboy characteristic of the lone libertarian dealing with things him/herself and not being hustled by the group. (You can also see it as buttressing his fierce maverick schtick in the same way.)

It plays to those who like the forthright and simplistic leader, and that's where McCain scored points last night: saying things with extreme simplicity and unequivocal finality. Sadly, far too many weak people LOVE the cocky, swaggering executive image; it's like nuns going to see gangster movies...

It also showed a moment where he hijacked the questioning for a second to make an only somewhat related point, but made it quickly and then went back to complying with the questioning. To many, this shows a sense of manners while still displaying the rebel chieftain image.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. But union ballots have NOTHING to do with the government
The question was about what rights citizens have to privacy FROM THEIR GOVERNMENT, not their neighbors or unions or the National Enquirer. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh I know it didn't have anything to do with the question.
Very few of his answers did.

He went in there with his talking points ready, and just threw them out there whether appropriate or not... mostly not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That's exactly how I interpreted what he said. I don't even understand
how that translates to an anti-union statement. (But please note, I'm very anti-McCain't.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It is very hard to bring a union into a company that doesn't have one.
Edited on Sun Aug-17-08 05:24 PM by hedgehog
AS far as I know, the law now is that if you get 30% of the employees to sign a card, then an election must be held to determine if people want to join a union. If 50% +1 sign, then the union is formed automatically. For some reason, companies are death on this system. I'm not sure why.

Lots more info here:

http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/employee-free-choice-act/resource-library/lies--distortion-on-the-secret-ballot-20080730-596-84-84.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good link---thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. That was the only mention of "privacy" in his answer
and the rest was about cracking down on terrorists. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow!
Folks, go do some reading. The 'secret ballot' anti-union thing is going to be one of the GOP's huge issues in this campaign. McCain did his part well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yep, I caught it--and I thought...
"you f*cker." It's a sorry state of affairs when a candidate can make such a blatant anti-union remark and not feel his campaign has been compromised.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC