|
Edited on Sat Aug-16-08 10:35 AM by liberalmuse
will likely be someone who will go on the offensive (I hope, I hope!). I also agree that Obama needs to keep doing what he's doing, but he will need a running mate who is not afraid to be blunt, yet can remain, for the most part, untainted, or at the very least, is not brought down by nasty smears, and who can also weather the MSM's twisting of their words. IMO, the VP would either have to be Clark, because his opinion is highly respected, and he did weather that last backlash not so long ago with no long-lasting ill effects. The man is consistent in fighting smears against the left. He is also well-liked and respected by people across the board.
Or Clinton, because she's been through the fire and is not afraid to speak her mind and get tough when needed. There is also the fact that a lot of women my age or older tend to take it personally when she is unfairly attacked, thus explaining some of the backlashes. I'm not saying this is right or wrong, it's just the way it is. I honestly don't know why it offends me so much, because I can't say that I've ever been a die-hard Hillary supporter. It is probably because I admire strong women and have seen how appallingly they have been treated by the patriarchy at times.
Or Biden, who knows how to throw out a really good soundbite that is both humorous and highly effective in hitting its mark. His last really good one one pretty much devastated Guiliani.
I'm sure there one or two other possible candidates who are similar that I'm leaving out, but I just don't see any of the other possible choices being all that effective against the smears, which are going to get even worse before November. That's just my opinion, narrow as it is, and it really isn't worth all that much.
Oh yeah, the point of the original post. I do believe things will change in that they will be in high gear after the Conventions.
|