Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew McCain personally lobbies to stop Mothers Against Drunk Driving

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:33 AM
Original message
Andrew McCain personally lobbies to stop Mothers Against Drunk Driving

Andrew McCain personally lobbies against The Center for Science in the Public Interest, the Marin Institute, the Consumer Federation of America and Mothers Against Drunk Driving in their fight to reduce drunk driving




As evangelicals turn into the "Values Forum" they may want to consider that the Republican presumed nominee is not only the benificiary of one of the most lucrative beer distributors in the country but that the family intends to continue to personally run the company after the chairman of the board, Cindy McCain, lives in the White House(as they have refused to indicate that they intend to put their business interests into a blind trust). It will certainly make it easier for the Hemsley/McCain family to continue to fight the efforts of MADD and other groups to reduce drunk driving.







Read Andrew McCain's letter to Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau successfully stopping MADD's attempt to improve beer and alcohol labelling here:


http://www.ttb.treas.gov/nprm_comments/ttbnotice41/other/041200011.pdf



Los Angeles Times



McCain could have a conflict brewing



http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-hensley22-2008jun22,0,457384.story?page=2&track=rss

A close look at Hensley shows that the company has opposed changes that critics of the beer industry say were intended to help Americans drink responsibly.


Hensley's lobbying activities have put the company at the center of a battle that has raged between the beer and liquor industries since Prohibition ended. Under federal law, liquor is taxed more heavily than beer and must contain a label that discloses alcohol content by percentage or proof. Beer and wine containers have no such disclosure requirement, though alcohol content varies widely.

Public interest groups have petitioned the Treasury Department in recent years to require that every container of beer, wine or liquor carry a label disclosing the amount of alcohol in one standard serving.


The Center for Science in the Public Interest, the Marin Institute, the Consumer Federation of America and Mothers Against Drunk Driving, among others, assert that such information would help Americans drink responsibly and avoid drunk driving.
The label would also contain nutrition information such as calories.

But the beer industry has argued that such labels would confuse consumers. With backing from Hensley and others, it has persuaded the Treasury Department to withdraw the alcohol content disclosure from any future label requirement.

"We strongly oppose any proposal that would back a display of alcohol content in terms of fluid ounces or pure alcohol per 'standard serving,' " wrote Andrew McCain, the senator's son. The 2005 letter was sent to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, a unit of the Treasury Department. Andrew McCain is chief financial officer at Hensley and owns 6.8% of the stock, according to Arizona records.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Conflict brewing..."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's a family man! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another McCain scandle
Will the MSM continue to look into this or to be a another passing story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. atleast the Los Angeles Times has given full exposure to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The article is from June 22, 2008
and this is the first I've heard of it. I think you have your answer. Teflon McCain..remember he was a POW for five years. POW POW POW POW. THAT is the barometer by which we are to judge McCain, that and nothing else. Forget Keating 5 or that he was against the MLK holiday before he was for it or that he had an affair on his wife who had been injured in a car accident. NONE of those things are important. NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Me too
I'm sure the article was on page 23 somewhere nice an inconspicuous. This surely wasn't reported by anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't know this was an issue
Do people really need to be told what proof their beer is? I kinda assumed most folks would just intuitively understand what the effects of drinking one beer (or 2 or 3 or more) would do to you. I don't see how a lable saying X proof on a can of beer would have any impact at all on someone's drinking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I didn't realize different beers have varying alcoholic content.
I'm not much of a drinker but if I were I think I'd like to know that kind of information.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. For people that are expecting to drive it would help them calculate their likely alcohol level

I just assume that MADD has good rationale for their request.

However the real issue is much more substantive than the label. Beer and other alcohol drinks are heavily regulated by the federal and state government. McCain has been recusing himself as a Senator on these issues while his family has been lobbying for them.

Presidents cannot recuse themselves and since 1978 all have put their wealth (normally stock and land) into a blind trust. McCain has said that he is not going to do this and does not intend to raise the issue until after he is elected. Cindy McCain, in reality, will continue to be the largest shareholder of a beer distributor while living in the White House. Do all of these conservative evangelical voters really understand and want a beer distributor to be run out of the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Where's the harm in labeling it? And the article states it's not for beer, it's for
alcoholized "energy drinks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No harm at all
I didn't say there was harm in labeling. I just said that I'd never heard about this as being an issue. I had one beer by the pool today after playing with the kids. The bottle said 5% alcohol by volume. OK, what does that really tell me? Nothing. I just don't see the point in putting information on a bottle of beer that will have no impact on drinking. We all know what effect a beer has.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Family Values Repigs or another example of the Corp Graft-greed Machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. IIRC, Cindy personally asked Andrew to do this; that is LOBBY AGAINST Mothers Against Drunk Driving.
If Sasha Obama had done the same, wouldn't it be all over the airwaves? The double standard is jaw-dropping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hmmm...And Is There Anything Out There About Andy's Banking Job?
The one he just got fired from...the Vegas bank that did a Silverado?

Sounds like this boy has both a silver spoon and a foot in his mouth...and a bunch of skeltons that need a little cloesr looking at.

My bets are if you follow the money you'll see the Helmsley interests are first and foremost in the family business...getting special laws passed and being able to thwart groups like MADD.

Also, to play the 2 + 2 game...is there any relationship between Helmsley and that Vegas bank? How junior McCain got his gig or bot bailed out?

The more I hear about this dude, the more a new Neil booooosh appears. Did he have hookers knocking on his door at 3am, too? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC