|
Lobbyists, mistresses, republican hacks. Advisors with dubious backgrounds and vague job descriptions. Millions of our donor dollars.
More than one candidate used poor judgement with our campaign dollars, and we - the supporters of these candidates - never really held them accountable. For the most part, we were pretty uncritical when it came to writing checks for the candidates we supported. But when you think about all the money that got pissed away - for what? It's pretty upsetting, and not in a "concern troll" sort of way - more like "why wasn't I more concerned when it came to the candidate(s) I supported?" I think all the candidates played it pretty loose with the cash - to varying degrees - to compete against other Dems. But how much of that was necessary? With 20 debates, we could really get to know the candidates at no cost to them. Alot of Obama donors in the primary are now tapped out. Could he have won if it weren't for all the money he spent? Since it's all Dems, and we're all about finance reform (right?), couldn't we have agreed to run it a bit tighter and leave K-Street out of it?
The whole thing seems pretty wasteful, looking back. But we all got caught up in the fever in our support, and forgot to demand transparency and care in the way they spent their campaign money. Our fault.
|