Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looks to me like Hillary's 2012 strategy is being put in play.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:19 PM
Original message
Looks to me like Hillary's 2012 strategy is being put in play.
Publicly she has to be behind Obama 100%. But its what she does and says privately that will do damage.

I hope I'm wrong, but that is the vibe I'm getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. And I was just starting to enjoy DU today. Yet another main post about Hillary's plaaaaaaans?
Why oh why oh why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ask her. and if you get the chance, tell her to cut it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Be specific. Cut out what? Supporting Obama? Following normal convention rules
to give the supporters who worked their butts off and sacrificed parts of their lives for her a moment of satisfaction? What exactly do you want her to knock off?

And while you are at it, explain why every single post you make around here attempts to divide rather than unite the party. You are obviously not supporting Obama or the Democrats. What is your agenda here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I was a delegate to the DNC in 2004
I was a Dean delegate. He released us and asked us to support Kerry on the first ballot. To tell you the truth, I would have been happier if it had been Dean, but it wasn't. At that point, it was about saving our country and working together. It wasn't about holding onto feelings of the past, how hard I had worked, silencing supporters or anything else, it was about coming together and working together to win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Maybe so, but Dean didn't come anywhere near as close as Clinton.
Nor was his campaign as historic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I was just telling you what happened in 2004
since "normal convention rules" were brought up. What the rules are and how things actually work aren't always the same thing. And, what's happened recently is that candidates release their delegates and allow them to vote they way that they want. Dean and others encouraged their delegates at the convention to vote for Kerry.

fwiw, I gave my floor credentials to my alternate. She voted for Kerry. My husband and I headed across town to hang out with the Edwards, Kucinich and other Dean delegates that gave up their credentials too. We all said we'd vote for Kerry in the general. I can't speak for the others but I did cast my vote for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. And I'm responding to that.
You are telling me what happened in 2004 to make a point about normal procedure. I'm making a counterpoint to illustrate that the example isn't identical. Wasn't contradicting anything you said. I should have said "Thanks for the first-hand experience," but I didn't, so that was a failing on my part. :)

The point here is that we have an historic election. For the first time a female candidate has won a significant portion of the primary votes. That deserves more than a "Hey, babe, nice shot," dismissal. That's all Clinton is trying for. And it is not an unusual request, to have both names in nomination and have a full roll call. Party unity doesn't mean party homogeneity. Let us recognize and celebrate Clinton's achievement, and more importantly the achievement of the millions who supported her. As Clinton pointed out, it will be cathartic, it will be inspirational, and it will make us all one big happy family again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. "Go ahead, fall in love, be for somebody,
" (Bill) Clinton said. "But when the primary's over, let's fall in line and bring the White House back to our party." http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/13/clinton.iowa/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Exactly. And the primary ends with the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. No, the primary is over
But, I don't think anything anyone will be able to say anything to you at this point. It sounds like you've got your mind made up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. telling people privately that Obama can't win and having said asses
tell the press. whether she asked them to do it or not, which I doubt, it is still out there. she needs to shut her face. this is about the country, not her widdow feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Rumors of rumors of rumors. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. her supporters should take satifaction that we are nominating the best candidate for President
so you wanted Hillary to win, that does not entitle you to carrying on after she lost.

She should knock off any actions which might lead her most fanatic supporters into making fools of themselves.
She should make it clear that Obama is the one and only nominee, she supports him, and she disapproves of anyone who doesn't.
She should not allow this Roll Call vote issue to continue to fester.

I support Obama wholeheartedly.
I must ask you what you have done to help him. Volunteering? Donations?
I have worked to get out the vote and given the max allowed because electing Obama is my agenda.

What is yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Well, since she has clearly and decisively done all that you say she should
I have to conclude that your agenda is the opposite of mine and hers. My agenda, and her stated agenda, is to elect Obama in November. You can fool some people, but I've been here a while. I see you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. unfortunately I dont' think you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree - fortunately the Clintons don't have the clout they once did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Seems to me that DU is obsessed with some 2012 theory that is baseless.
She is NOT trying to crush Obama to run in 2012.

That's insanity.

And why must DU ruin another newscycle with posts about Hillary?

Can we talk about Obama vs. McCain, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's not baseless when we keep getting shot at from behind.
And everybody HAD dropped the issue until the Clinton people revived it. They WANTED this story, and wanted to revive the specter of Democratic disunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They seem to have revived it in order to get two convention spots...
What a way to put a damper on what should be a glorious time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. She me the bullet holes. For that matter, show me a day around here
without constant Clinton bashing. It's like the freaking Republican Party website around here sometimes.

Both of your premises are false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. When Lamont defeated Lieberman in '06.....
... she dutifully supported the DEM nominee in the general but rumor had it that her people were encouraging $$$ people to sit on their hands... or should I say, dollars.

Lieberman had been her original fave in the primary. (Surprise)

Hopefully, when Obama starts to address the deficiencies of the GOP candidate more directly and more quotably , he'll leave McCain in the dust and there will be no 2012 for Sen. Clinton.

I say "hopefully" because I'm beginning to doubt whgether he will do so. This race should not be so close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Lanny Davis, Ickes and the rest of them were helping Lieberman
Edited on Fri Aug-08-08 12:58 PM by Bleachers7
So that tells you what was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. You lost me right here:
rumor had it

Those words make everything you said afterwards meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. "RUMOR" had it..
'nuff said. Do you believe ALL rumors or just the ones bashing Senator Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. The Clinton (DLC) support for the Democratic candidate, Lamont,
was minimal and unenthusiastic. Resembles their support for Obama so far.
Just barely going through the motions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. UNITY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Say it again
U N I T Y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. U-N-I-T-Y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. She is going out to campaign for Obama this week
To me, that speaks louder than all the paranoia being posted around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Vibes are for the DU Lounge, son. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedShoes Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. thank you for your CONCERN. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. I disagree (now)
since Hillary is filling in for Barack while he is on vacation, this indicates Barack has 100% confidenvce in Hillary.

Also, I get the feeling that the next week of Hillary campaigning for Barack solo is a "tryout" for the Veep spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Looks to me like some people just can't stop hating on the Clintons.
And it will go on and on and on and on I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristyt Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Yes Be Afraid... Very Scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. Nothing would shock me
and I'm getting the same vibe. They want 2012 very, very badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. Oh shut up already
You're a freakin' moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. didn't the Mayans mention her in their calendar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC