|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 07:57 AM Original message |
Gary Hart on Clinton's convention protesters: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. Nothing kills a thread faster than information which goes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. So is Hart supporting Clinton's delegates voting for her, or against it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. It's pretty clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Youre exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. No: it is democracy in the making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Actually a crowning is exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. No. Its shit stirring in the making. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:47 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Lucky for her she's slightly better a hiding it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. So, Hart is a hypocrite? Gotcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yes, understanding that different situations require different responses is hypocrital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 08:55 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. "Different situations" is a convenient CYA for being a hypocrite, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. You're right. I'm sure 1984 looked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. /yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SurfingAtWork (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. You make a great point. I mean had Heart's delegates not got warm fuzzies, we may have lost '84 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Heart thinks that it isn't in Clinton's best interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. My real concern is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
12. Hillary has earned the right to have a roll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. And a roll call, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
31. Hillary should call on her supporters to vote for the nominee. Problem solved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
15. Vote For McCain Ladies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
18. Reality check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Thanks for posting these facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Why cant they just be loyal DEMS and boost the nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
41. I agree they should all vote for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Obviously the problem is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. No, the problem is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. And what did 2004 look like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Are you missing the point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. That picture is EXACTLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. And then we proceeded to lose the election. Why is 2004 supposed to be a reassuring example? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. My question was regarding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. One factor in our 2004 loss was that many DEMS were not fully unified behind the nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. I did NOT bring the election cycle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. All you have to do is get 100% behind the DEM NOMINEE. It's easy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #52 |
61. You don't see the point because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
64. If he was so "lousy" how did he get more votes than any other presidential candidate in history? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. Hillary' s race is just as historical as Obama's and deserves to be recognized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. She's been recognized. Let's recognize her *again* some other time- like safe from the Whitehouse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
63. Exactly. Kerry and Dean are not running this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. We LOST in '72, '80, '84, '88 & '04. Why are those elections supposed to be reassuring examples? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. EXACTLY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. And in '76 it was the R's who had a contested convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
48. Loyalty has nothing to do with it!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. Why cant these people come to the convention to support the NOMINEE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unfaithful_servant (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
65. Correlation is not causation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ewellian (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. Jesse had his name placed on the roll call to make a point - that a black man could become the Pres! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Well, the point this time around is that a woman almost became the party's nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. If Hillary's last name wouldn't have been Clinton, she wouldn't be in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. That's a pathetic comment!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
33. Why so-called Loyal Democrats cant get 100% behind the nominee is wayyyy beyond me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Because theyre not loyal Dems. Theyre loyal Clintonists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Way to dismiss 48% of the folks who took part in the primaries! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Operation Chaos had a lot of crossover Republicans in those last primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 04:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Most of Hillary's 18 million voters are lifelong Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. In the last few primaries, more than 5 million were registered Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 06:02 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. I cannot accept that number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. Considering that she won more votes from registered Democrats than Obama did, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. If they are threatening to vote McCain (R)- then its safe to say they are not loyal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 06:03 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. Good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
40. How do you feel about the groups targeting Dean and doing attack ads against him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #40 |
68. Oh noes! They're using the First Amendment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
50. It is hard to separate the two Clinton's to me even though I know it isn't fair.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
60. Joke of the day...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. I was always told, that one person/group cannot have an argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ewellian (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. The problem with your argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC