Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The perils of polling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:38 PM
Original message
The perils of polling
Polling: A Greater Margin for Error
By Adriel Bettelheim, CQ Staff


To avid followers of election year metrics, a University of New Hampshire Survey Center poll of 519 residents last month could be seen as a sign that the stubbornly independent “Live Free or Die” state, scene of John McCain ’s greatest primary triumphs both in 2000 and this year, was getting swept up in Obamamania. It showed Barack Obama narrowly ahead, 46 percent to 43 percent, with 3 percent supporting other candidates and 8 percent undecided.

But the way pollsters got to these results was perhaps more telling than the top-line numbers. A full 28 percent of those surveyed initially replied that they were still trying to decide whom to support — not so surprising in a state where about 38 percent of registered voters are unaffiliated with either major party. These “don’t knows” are a continual irritation for public-opinion gatherers, particularly in the middle of a presidential race that’s attracting intense worldwide interest. So the interviewers, employing a decades-old tactic of squeezing out clear choices, pressed the holdouts to decide by asking them which way they would vote supposing the election were held that day. Most made a choice.

Did the surveying tactics make the results misleading, or were they part of a well-tested strategy for predicting voter behavior? Is this type of opinion research an effective way of assessing how a campaign is going? Or is it primarily an exercise in generating headlines that detracts from more important questions about public preferences and attitudes?

These questions are the kind that nag at pollsters in most election years. But for a number of reasons having to do with the candidates, voting trends and the voters themselves, pollsters this year face a number of unique challenges in getting to the heart of public opinion.

more...

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=weeklyreport-000002933553
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not MY original thought: "POLL FRAUD MUST PRECEDE ELECTION FRAUD"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC