Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do VP candidates debate each other anyway?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:22 PM
Original message
Why do VP candidates debate each other anyway?
Shouldn't it be Pres vs. Pres or Pres & VP vs. Pres & VP? It's not like we have a separate vote for VP - people either vote for the person at the top, or for the team. :shrug:

Maybe I'm just thinking it would be fun to see the 2 GOPers debating each other while 2 Dems beat up on them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. sort of a
TRADITION?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I have a serious lack of respect for tradition! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. In a tag-team match
They need managers too to distract the ref while the foreign object is used. I'm think Joementum for McCain, and Clinton for Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's traditional entertainment for the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. because if the President dies they take over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. but it's not like if the sitting president dies, the VP has to compete with the other VP nom again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. people who feel equally about Presidential Candidates
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 10:28 PM by JI7
might decide to vote based on VP.

i don't think it matters too much but i think it's just a way to let people see them because they could be 2nd in line to being President if anything happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I agree the VPs need attention, but I think they need attention vs. opposite Pres nom.
not each other. Comparing Bentsen and Quayle or Edwards and Cheney doesn't say much about the real comparison on which people vote. (Dukakis-Bentsen vs. Bush-Quayle, Kerry-Edwards vs. Bush-Cheney)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because the VP is a heartbeat away from the presidency and it's important to know about them.
A debate helps with that. We are not voting for the nominee and his secretary. If the VP wasn't a heartbeat away from the presidency, then that choice could always be left until AFTER the election.

What do you have against that debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. The VP canidates usually go for the jugular.
They say things the actual canidates do not, but would like to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. right, but I want our VP to go for McCain's, not McQuayle's nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. McCain, is kind of untouchable
in a sense. Not only because of his prisoner of war history, but also his age. Anyone else and Obama would have chewed him up and spit him out, Chicago style. I think he has let McCain tie himself up in knots quite a few times, and it is starting to make an impact on people. This is not showing so much in the polls just yet, but I am hearing it out in the real world, more and more. People are very uncomfortable with McCains not being able to stay on message. May not be fair, but older people have to cross a higher bar when it comes to things like that. So it is a double edged sword, we may not be able to attack him head on, but it works for us in the long run. I know that sounds cold, but it is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC