Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is going to win the popular vote, but that doesn't guarantee victory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mathwhiz Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:14 PM
Original message
Obama is going to win the popular vote, but that doesn't guarantee victory
He's doing what no democrat has ever done in recent memory: run a 50 state campaign.

This has 2 immediate benefits: It will lower McCain's margins in the states he will win compared to Bush in 2004 and 2000. Where Bush won states like Indiana by 20, McCain will be lucky to win by 5. Where Kerry won states like California by 10 points, Obama will probably win by 20 or more. This also increases the likelihood of landslide gains in the House and Senate.

But with the electoral college, a win is a win even by a little. And a loss is still a loss whether you lose by 2 points or 30.

It would be interesting how the country would react if Obama wins the popular vote by 10 points yet still loses the electoral college because of squeaker losses in states like FL, Oh, MI, VA.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. We already had that scenario in 2000. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:17 PM
Original message
That's what some CNN Media Hoe was trying to say today.
Obama will win.

But thank you for playing, once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. An electoral college loss and popular vote win of +10 is nearly impossible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathwhiz Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How so?
Obama may win California by 30 points with 1/8th the population of the country. But what good does that do him? He still gets the same electoral votes. Do the math. If Obama significantly overperforms in base blue states and narrows margins in red states but not enough for him to win, it is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. But he is already doing better in several red states that Kerry didn't win.
Colorado and New Mexico, for instance. Also Montana. There are some real possibilities out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sure, it's technically possible to win CA by 30 and still lose OH, but it's really unlikely.
Voters in California aren't *that much* different than those in Ohio. A candidate so popular in California that he'd crush his opponent 2-1 is very likely to be popular enough in Ohio and other swing states that he'd at least win there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. You are repeating word for word that CNN Hoe.
What's his name? Snyder or something?

Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Since we are already ahead in states that Kerry lost in 04, we are doing very well
in the Electoral College, if not in the overall popular vote. I take the popular vote increase to be the fact that McCain is running up his votes in red states that we didn't count on anyway. So if he delivers the states that are the states that Kerry won plus what Ohio would have given him, we would have it, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC