Is Obama getting STEALTH "google-bombed?"

sourmilk

(512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 07:03 AM
Original message

Is Obama getting STEALTH "google-bombed?"

How in the heck could googling "Obama Lies" produce thirteen million references when googling "Bush Lies" produces just over a million references, and "Clinton Lies" produces only three million???

There is something going ON here, I believe...

I haven't seen anyone on any RW site (FR, LGF, Politico, Salon, Drudge - ya, I checked them all and then took the day off, sick) asking people to "google-bomb" this phrase, but it seems inconceivable to me that this could be some kind of "innocent mistake."

Does anyone know anything about a stealth campaign? Are RW blog writers and RW posters purposefully using this term in order to send a message and to make it so that anytime ANYONE searches the phrase, they get OVERWHELMED? Could there be an alternate justification for this phenomenon I am unaware of?

Perhaps I need to take the AFB off, folks, but honestly, this does not sound (at least, to me) remotely possible under normal circumstances.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Tim4319

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message

1. I'm not the least bit suprised!

Many of the the issues that are brought about the Obama's are either blown way out of proportion or are non-issues. To see the 13 million references does not shock me one bit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sourmilk

(512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #1

2. Even in comparison to "Bush Lies?"

I really think that this is STRANGE - to say the least!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Tim4319

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #2

3. However

I was a little bit surprised by that figure. I thought is should have been a little bit closer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

patrice

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message

4. Maybe folk aren't talking about Bush Lies (pro or con) because that's a Given. nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sourmilk

(512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #4

5. I seem to remember a pretty long google campaign for "Bush Lied..."

I just find it difficult to conceive that "Obama Lies" could even come close to "Bush Lies" - let alone top it by 1300%...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

barack the house

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message

6. Obama is very popular worldwide it also depends the context..

Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 07:58 AM by barack the house

The world is discussiing all the Obama lies made about him. The world has given up talking about Bush they know what to expect with him there is a whirlwind of excitement for Obama though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LowerManhattanite

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-15-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message

7. If Google adds in the stuff DU's PUMA deadenders throw up...

...here every day, I can easily see that 13 million number being right.

Easily. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:45 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.