Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anybody know military regulations well?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:05 PM
Original message
Does anybody know military regulations well?
I'm wondering if John McCain could collect his annual disability payment (I think it's $58,000) if he was still in the military.

The reason I ask is that the recent New York Times article gave the impression that McCain opted out of military service because he could serve his country better in politics. But I wonder if making this decision entitled him to the money that he otherwise might forfeit if he had stayed in the service. Why pay someone for working while you're also paying them for being totally disabled?

Obama's people won't raise this, not should they. But if McCain had a financial reason for opting out of further military service when he went into politics instaed, I think we should know that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard the military has classified him as 100% disabled. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Disability thru VA. Active duty does not collect 100% (BTW!!!!)
He is NOT necesarily considered 100% disabled, he is 100% SERVICE CONNECTED... The VA has a thousand different classifications...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is he on Disability or half pay? I suspect half-pay.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 11:45 PM by happyslug
What most people call a "military Pension" is in reality "Half-Pay". Technically the soldier/sailor having served 20 years, is put on inactive duty at half pay. This continues till he or she dies. His widow (or her widower) has some rights, but not important here. If no 20 year service no half-pay (You may be put on half pay if you are unable to continue your military service do to an injury, which I believe, is the case with McClain, but I also believe he has his 20 years in). The down side of Half pay is the soldier/Sailor can be called up at any time for further service, since he or she is still technically "on duty" even through it is inactive.

I suspect McClain is on this program for a Navy Captain pay at present is $8913 a Month with 24 years service is $106,956yearly. Half pay would then be $53,478. Given he has a Wife, he is entailed to a spouse allowance of $1065.6 per month or $12,787.60 per year, half pay would be $6393.60 per year. Total Income at Half Pay would be $59,871.30 per month.

Now according to the account on Wikipedia he served only 23 years, excluding his time in the Naval Academy. Given that the above number is close to the Pension you give of $58,000, I fully believe he is on half-pay.

Now I do NOT know the details of how years in Service is counted, nor the actual details, the above is just an outline based on the fact that what most people call a Military Pension has been since the time of the American Revolution Half pay (and had been Half Pay in British and Colonial Service since the time of Oliver Cromwell in the mid-1600s).

For more on Pay rates see the following:
http://www.navycs.com/08militarypaychart.html
http://www.militaryconnection.com/charts.asp

Disability is different. That is based on how injured you are. How it relates to Half-pay I do no know, but I suspect it is reduced by how much half-pay a retiree gets (Or the half-pay is reduced by how much disability one gets). Disability goes to anyone who was injured and suffered what the VA calls a permanent injury. This is where you here the term 20%, 40$ and 100% disabled. My father was 20% disabled, but was able to work as a letter Carrier for the Post Office for almost 40 years. His wife received NOTHING from that benefit since it was viewed as the military equivalent of Workmen's Compensation.

A third program is what the Fed's call the "Improved Pension". McClain is NOT getting it for the "Improved Pension" is for those people who have served in the Military (and their spouses) and has no other source of income and no longer can work do to a disability incurred AFTER they left the service. It pays better then Supplemental Security Income (SSI) but is basically the same thing (But the DAV, VFW and American Legion have a better lobby than the Welfare Rights Organization).

Just an outline on three types of "Pension" someone who had been in the Military can receive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Should be "due to an injury" not "do to an injury"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I paraphrase Sir Samuel Johnson
"I person who can spell a word only one way, shows a lack of education". Some people are just to picky on the use of "do" and "due".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I quote Mark Twain
The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug.


Do and due are entirely different words with entirely different meanings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Maybe so. But also picky about the difference between to and too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. He was already married to a multi-millionaire heiress
when he left the military. I doubt it was about the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. as a POW for 5 yrs, he came out gimped, was D/C'd with 100% svc connected disability
based upon his paygrade at discharge he gets X amount of dollars per month for life

this pension is not income based, and can be drawn in full regardless of outside income or employment status

that's the law

it's a good law

keep scratchin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC