Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain strategist: Terrorist attack ‘would be a big advantage’ in election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:29 PM
Original message
McCain strategist: Terrorist attack ‘would be a big advantage’ in election
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 01:30 PM by cbc5g
http://rawstory.com/news08/2008/06/23/mccain-strategist-terrorist-attack-would-be-a-big-advantage-in-election/

As part of a series on “The candidates and your money,” Fortune Magazine asked Senator John McCain what he perceived as the single greatest economic threat to the United States. McCain’s reply, after several seconds of staring “into the void,” was “radical Islamic extremism.”

According to top McCain strategist Charlie Black, this response was no error. National security is McCain’s winning answer, no matter what the question.

For example, Black told Fortune that even though the assassination of former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto last December was an “unfortunate event,” it was useful to McCain in the New Hampshire primary, because “his knowledge and ability to talk about it reemphasized that this is the guy who’s ready to be Commander-in-Chief. And it helped us.”

The Fortune interviewer goes on to say that “Black concedes with startling candor after we raise the issue” that McCain would also be helped by “another terrorist attack on U.S. soil. ‘Certainly it would be a big advantage to him,’ says Black.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a disgusting thing to say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure Bush can make that happen
just like the last one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, are
they planning one?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Either that or an attack on Iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sick mofo for sure.
We've got Kristol saying Georgie will bomb Iran if it looks like Obama will win and Chuckie Black talking up how another attack here will benefit McCain.

TRAITORS! God, what sickening little men you are!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think another terrorist attck would be the end of the Republicans.
It would prove beyond a doubt that in spite of all the noise they make, they have NOT made America safer. They have failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The RWing is always bragging that the Busholini Regime has
prevented another attack in America & how the US Occupations of Iraq & Afghanistan are keeping
America safe. How would an attack in America bolster their bogus bragging?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. george H.W. Bush; "what this country needs is another pearl harbor, (before 9-11 attack)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That was also in the PNAC statement of principles
which they cleverly took down after 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if they'll raise the terror threat level or release another Bin Ladin tape
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 02:33 PM by cbc5g
right before the election.

They did in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. How can this be seen as an advantage? I'm still trying to figure this out.
Wouldn't a terrorist attack signal that Bush and the Repugs can't keep us safe? They can't manage the economy, two wars, and they can't keep us safe!! x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Too few Americans think critically. They would believe the endless media spew
that dems are weak on defense & only repubs can keep us safe. With the exception of KO, I have never heard any one in the media point out that 9/11 happened on the repubs watch. I have so little confidence in the American people that I'm certain it would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Did I just hear Wolf Blitzer bring this story up? Could it be? The MSM doing its job??!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC