Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is anyone (everyone) afraid to attack McCain on his 'military' and 'national security' .............

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:39 PM
Original message
Is anyone (everyone) afraid to attack McCain on his 'military' and 'national security' .............
....... creds based on his military service?

Here is a quick rundown of the facts:

John McCain was a crappy student at the Naval Academy and it is quite possible that if his father and grandfather were not who they were, he might have been dismissed prior to graduation.

He was not a good pilot and, ignoring being shot down over Hanoi (more on that later), he had bad luck with planes and crashed or damaged more than one of them. 'Nuff said.

To his credit, he went to Vietnam when many others chose to actively avoid doing so. He was shot down over Hanoi (likely through no fault of his own). He was held as a POW and was arguably very heroic in deciding not to accept the free pass offered him, choosing instead to say he would only leave after those who had been there longer were released. The notion that he betrayed his country with some statements is bullshit. He was tortured for a very long time. I begrudge him none of that and, indeed, view him in this regard as a real hero.

When he got out of Viet Nam, he continued to serve for a while ......... in a political job in DC.

NO WHERE AT ALL in that history is there anything that makes him either a military, or a national security, or a foreign policy expert.

What he is, is a disabled vet who served in Viet Nam and was held as a POW. That's it.

The rest of his portfolio is being in Congress so long that he's lost any sense of principled behavior and he's sufficiently old that he is ossified in his views and displays occasional signs of .... mmmmm ..... to be kind ...... 'advancing years'.

John McCain is no more a foreign policy 'expert' than any other sentient person who pays attention and gets occasional classified briefings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not Me.
I say he was, at best, a poor Naval Aviator.
His piloting skills are suspect: He got shot down.
His "escape and evasion " skills are poor: He was captured and failed to escape.
Hero? No, just a bad pilot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not Wes Clark - read this from today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because if you do people will point fingers and say jingositic cliches at you.
"why do you hate america" "some things shouldn't be questioned" "he has experience (tm)"
Things like that. Personally, I think it all is fair game and should be questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
think4yourself Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree.
He's really created this brand identity that has not been challenged in 8 years. And the MSM in the same breath, when saying his name, always say, he is unmatched in National Security matters. He doesn't even know who the enemy in Iraq is. He votes FOR torture after being tortured for YEARS.
That's not strength or experience.
That's just stupid insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. He caused the USS Forrestal disaster.
He was horsing around with another pilot on the deck, and did an ill-advised "wet start" of his plane, which triggered a chain reaction where a rocket from his F4 was launched into the fuel tank of the Skyhawk and a massive fire ensued, killing several dozen crewmembers. He was transferred immediately after it happened.

Yet another example of the MSM giving a Republican pol a free pass. Can you just imagine if he were a Democratic Presidential nominee? Forrestal would be a household word. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. allow me to back you up with a link?
http://judicial-inc.biz/82jjohn_mccain_and_the_uss_forresta.htm
http://www.blah3.com/article.php?story=20070122183950855
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_11_16/ai_61361646
a quote from a witness
Patane Joseph M.
Service Dates=4/65 to 9/68

I served aboard Forrestal at the time of the fire aboard ship while attached to fighter squadron eleven out of Oceana Va. It just so happend that I was working on the flight deck at the time of the fire onthe flight deck, if it wasn't for this I believe in all honesty that I would have been killed with the 80 0r 90 some of my shipmates caught in their bunks asleep, I also believe that I wouldn't be able to say I saw what started the fire to begin with, and that's why I was put back on forrestal when she came home from PI ON her way back to Norfolk Va. McCain keeps blaming my squadron for this fire, when in all actuality, it was a fuel leak off his center line tank, and the ships power cords used to supply the electrial to turn up our craft, not VF-11 SHOOTION a missle acrost the flight deck as we we blamed for, and still are to this day,and if able I would tell Senator McCain what a lier he really is.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCofVA Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. I'm glad you were on the flight deck that day, swampg8r
If he really did cause the accident and then blamed other people for it, that is very much an issue that should be brought up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. you misunderstand
i was not a witness but i quoted a witness statement
as to who caused it it is still a question
his actions during the fire speak for themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Refusing early release was probably more about his father than anything else
Military families are like no others..

I'm betting that the shame he would have brought his father (and himself FROM his father) would have been harder to endure than staying in Hanoi..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. The only request I have, if we talk about his military service, is that we do not "swiftboat" him.
I'm not in any position to say judge McCain's piloting skills or if his behavior as a POW differed greatly from other who were held captive and/or tortured. I do, however, consider that he served his country with honor and I will defend that service from "swiftboat" style attacks. That is not to say that I believe that his service alone gives him an edge on national security or foreign policy matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. "swiftboating " requires lies...
There are no lies in the OP. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hardbop Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Honestly, I think it should be off limits
Regardless of how sharp his aviator skills were, he sacrificed for his country and we should honor that.

I say going after him on these grounds is off limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. see my reply above and then say that
over 100 dead on the forrestal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. From what I
have read about early release it was offered to all prisoners but most POW's followed the code and took a pass at it until all were released. So nothing extraordinary there either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Forty-seven thousand military, foreign policy, and national security experts DIED if we apply that
logic to the KIA in Viet Nam. I don't see many survivors popping out of the woodwork to asy they are as equally qualified, either.

http://www.rjsmith.com/kia_tbl.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's a highly dangerous angle of attack for us to use.
I agree that it's not the record some would like us to believe about him, but I think it has a higher chance of backfiring than actually helping us. We honestly have so much on him, which he seems to add to daily, that we shouldn't even need to go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. His actual military service should be off limits
But I have no problem dismantling this bullshit about him being some sort of foreign policy expert, which he certainly isn't judging by his constant gaffes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I totally agree with that.
That's fair game, and I think we can mine that and score some points. But it has to be done right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. "But it has to be done right."
That goes without saying. The Great Wurlitzer will be all cranked up 'to eleven' defending him. We simply need to separate his military service from the rest of his biography. Once done, he becomes a man built like a house of cards is built.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. That's the crux of the issue. Thank you.
I'm not saying his military service, per se, ought to be an issue. In fact, I oppose making it an issue. It is his using that as the basis for his supposed 'expert' status with foreign policy, security, and military issues that is in question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. I will always refer to him as "Crash" McCain
It's on record that he crashed four planes before he was shot down.

A Marine copter pilot friend of mine who served in VietNam called "Crash" a loser and said he fucked up. (And this guy is a hard core Republican).

If a vet says that, "Crash's" record is fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. We do not need to
he is so weak on so many fronts we can afford to leave it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. We can't be afraid to use anything legitimate against him
If he runs as a "war hero" then the truth about his military record should come out. Not as bad as Bush, but its not like he was a General or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. The truth of his military service is not the pont or the issue
Let him claim 'hero' status. I could care less.

What is much more important is to show that NOTHING in his biography warrants his being called an 'expert' in matters of national security, military, or foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. Wes Clark, John Kerry, and Bradon Friedman poking holes into McC's claim to foreign policy strengh
That's surfacing today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Charlie Crist was on Morning Joe just now talking about this
"Sniping and unfair attacks" is what these two assholes were talking about.

No facts, just feigned outrage.

We can, in fact, win on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Galway girl Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
26. I don't like how he treats his wives The "C" word is fair game
. How he left his first one and whathe calls his second one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC