|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 10:48 PM Original message |
Why does Obama not include the DCCC And DSCC in his new lobbying rule - why the exceptions for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Obama doesn't control the DSCC or DCCC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. OK - thanks - but still why the exclusion for state lobbyists, etc? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Because there's no conflict of interest involved in a Federal-level entity accepting money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. The Illinois state coal lobbyists that funded Obama's State Senate runs do not have the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. If they drop by the Chicago office, they'd have to register as federal lobbyists, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
33. No. There's no conflict, so long as they are not lobbying him for anything he would do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. As the nominee, Obama effectively leads the DNC, not the DCCC and DSCC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. OK - thanks - but still why the exclusion for state lobbyists, etc? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. you poor thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. If Obama was running for governor, I'd guess he would do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. Enjoy it while you can...only a few more days now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Most of the Clinton supporters have come over with peace and dignity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. I'd say the vast majority have done that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Was this on one of the HateBama blogs? There's been like three threads using similar wording, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Maybe the conference calls are still going on without Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wvbygod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. And then what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
30. Then stupid flamebait about our nominee will not be allowed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wvbygod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. An intent to discuss why half the Democratic funds are still in question seems fine to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. How about not posted by someone notorious for posting nonstop flamebait about Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM7nj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
6. The DNC and DSCC/DCCC are not (officially) connected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. Why don't you contact those organizations and ask them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. The DNC reports to him now. Congress Critters are independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. true - but the state lobbyist cut out from the new rule makes me scratch my head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. *snicker*. sure they do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I am sorry you are confused. Let me help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Does the DNC have power to pressure them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. No clue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. What do you mean by "power to pressure them?" I mean, you have the "power to pressure them." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. You make me scratch my head. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #14 |
36. No, you just have lice. See a doctor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muryan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. Its funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. One or another, I'd guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muryan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 12:02 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I am too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Though there is the old trick of poets involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
27. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
32. Deleted message |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
37. Wednesday is gonna be rough on you, isn't it? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-08-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
38. Do you have to interview for the position of concen troll or is it simply a test you take? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC