Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Webb being VP... Could he affect bordering states?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:25 PM
Original message
Webb being VP... Could he affect bordering states?
Edited on Fri Jun-06-08 03:52 PM by adoraz
I think if Webb is VP, it is very obvious Obama will win Virginia. My question for anyone who knows a lot about the GE, do VPs usually affect states nearby?

Even if they have a very small impact on the bordering states or states in the same general area, it could make a huge difference with the electoral.



Now, some states he won't win nearby, like Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee. Its pretty clear that it would take a miracle to win those states.

However, some of the other bordering states or states in the general area are North Carolina, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and you might even make the argument that the rest of the Deep South (including NC) could be affected by a choice from Virginia.

As I said, I don't know how much of an impact a VP has on bordering states, but if there is any at all Webb may be the PERFECT choice as far as the map goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. We must protect PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. PA is going to be tough but I think we can win it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. PA won't be a swing-state as the election comes close
anyone telling you otherwise is being intellectually dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. I live in PA and the prediction has nothing to do with intellectual dis-honesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. no, no, no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. could you be more specific?
Do you mean VPs have no impact at all on bordering states? Its an honest question that I don't know, so thats why I'm asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Judging by the reception he gets here from some, he'd be the perfect choice
Edited on Fri Jun-06-08 03:30 PM by cbc5g
For bringing the rural and suburban people on board with Obama. He can connect with them. He's not elitist and he doesn't have 400 dollar haircuts or a record as a trial lawyer. He was in Vietnam, a talking point McCain likes to discuss when talking about why he's the best on foreign policy. I still like Mark Warner better though. You just can't beat an 80% approval rating in a state that could change the dynamics of electoral politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:30 PM
Original message
haven't heard much about Mark Warner
I'll do some research on him, thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Webb seems like the natural choice
:hi: by the way. Richmond here.

Webb would be a great balance but I doubt that he wants to give up his nice comfy Senate seat but then he couldn't have really thought he had much of a chance to even be HERE two years ago so who knows??? The life of a US Senator is a good one though.

Schweitzer is another obvious choice because he could help in the Mountain West (the SD and MT primaries being last and the convention being in Denver are no coincidence)

Richardson would be a great choice too

I would be SHOCKED if Kaine took that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Really? 80% approval rating?
Does he go around mowing his constituents' lawns or something? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
52. No kidding
I don't like the guy myself, but if Virginia loves him that much, I'm on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
54. He also fits in well with Obama's theme of unity
Edited on Sat Jun-07-08 02:09 AM by fujiyama
After all, Webb served as Sec. of the Navy under Reagan. He's also tough as nails and doesn't take shit from anyone. He'd rip apart any of McCain's RW stooge VP picks, whether it's Jindal, Pawlenty or whichever other hack he choses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. No conservative Dems on the ticket please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. anti-war pro-choice and pro-gay rights isn't exactly conservative
Edited on Fri Jun-06-08 03:32 PM by cbc5g
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. He also wrote an article called "Women can't fight"

and voted against an Iraq Withdrawal Amendment that was co-sponsored by Senators Barbara Boxer and Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. That was 30 years ago, and he has since changed his mind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Wouldn't help him with Clinton's base much, though.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Sad but true. :-/ eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
53. And led the way for women in the Navy
That was one stupid article but it's not the entirety of the man.

http://www.raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5203
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. tough and strong on defense does not make him conservative
do you have any substantative issues that you think are relevant.

Personally I will give up several of those for the guy that went face to face with Bush and made bush turn and run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. He voted against an Iraq withdrawal amendment
co-sponsored by Obama and Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. He also vote *against* kyl-lieberman
On the Senate floor today, Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) made an impassioned appeal to his fellow senators, declaring that the Lieberman-Kyl amendment on Iran should be “withdrawn” because the “proposal is Dick Cheney’s fondest pipe dream.” Webb cautioned that the “cleverly-worded sense of the Congress” could be “interpreted” to “declare war” on Iran. He continued:

Those who regret their vote five years ago to authorize military action in Iraq should think hard before supporting this approach. Because, in my view, it has the same potential to do harm where many are seeking to do good.

“At best, it’s a deliberate attempt to divert attention from a failed diplomatic policy,” said Webb. “At worst, it could be read as a backdoor method of gaining Congressional validation for military action, without one hearing and without serious debate.” Watch it:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/25/webb-kyl-lieb-iran/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. He wants to stay in Iraq
Edited on Fri Jun-06-08 04:07 PM by nebula
voted NO on Iraq withdrawal amendment sponsored by Feingold, Boxer and Obama.

I do not trust Webb on foreign policy farther than I can throw him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I dont know about that bill specifically but this is a quote from Webb on Iraq withdrawal




From the August 26 edition of ABC's This Week:

WEBB: In terms of the aftermath , no one in a responsible position in government is saying that we should pull the plug in Iraq and have a precipitous withdrawal. What we're trying to do is to say eventually we have to withdraw from Iraq. We have to draw down our troops. Even the military realities of the surge which have up-swung the cycles of deployment are going to mandate that we reduce our troops and eventually leave. We're not going to have stability in that region until the American troops are out of Iraq. We have to do it in a way that brings in the other countries around the region, allows us to focus on international terrorism and doesn't destabilize the region, but it must be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I wish Webb's rhetoric would match his voting record

he cannot be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #37
50. Comparing the Senate voting records of Sen. Obama, Sen. Webb and Sen. McCain
Edited on Sat Jun-07-08 02:13 AM by Douglas Carpenter

At first I was a bit skeptical of him. But after taking a closer look, I have to admit being somewhat impressed.

My most important reason from my point view is that his writings while teaching at the Naval War College in Monterey, California reveal that he is a foreign policy realist and pragmatist and thus not the sort to rush into ill advised military interventions. Equally important he shares with Sen. Obama the sense of importance with opening dialog with adversaries and making a sincere effort at diplomacy in resolving conflict.

But, just how liberal is he on other issues? I would have to say, more than I thought

First, here is just one example: In 2007 The Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law gave Senator Webb a grade of A+.

Here are some more along with a comparison with Sen. Obama’s and Sen. McCain’s record:

All figures are interest group ratings from 2007.:

The link for Sen. McCain's ratings on Project Vote Smart:

http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=53270&type=category&category=45&go.x=10&go.y=12

The link for Sen. Obama's ratings on Project Vote Smart:

http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=9490

The link for Sen. Webb’s ratings on Project Vote Smart:

http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=60043

Abortion Issues


In 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Senator Obama a grade of 100.

2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Senator Webb a grade of 100.

In 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Senator McCain a grade of 0.

_________________________________

Civil Rights and Human Rights Issues


2007 American Civil Liberties Union gave Senator Obama a grade of 80.

In 2007 American Civil Liberties Union gave Senator Webb a grade of 71.

2007 American Civil Liberties Union gave Senator McCain a grade of 50.
______________________________________________________________

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 85 percent in 2007

Senator Webb supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 85 percent in 2007.

Senator McCain supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 15 percent in 2007.

_____________________________________________________________________

Conservative Issues


Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 7 percent in 2007.

2007 Senator Webb supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 16
percent in 2007

Senator McCain supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 80 percent in 2007.
_______________________________________________________________________

Education Issues


In 2007 National Education Association gave Senator Obama a grade of A.

In 2007 National Education Association gave Senator Webb a grade of A.

In 2007 National Education Association gave Senator McCain a grade of F.
.
________________________________________________________________________

.
_

Environmental Issues


2007 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to League of Conservation Voters's position, Senator Obama received a rating of 67.

2007 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to League of Conservation Voters's position, Senator Webb received a rating of 87.

2007 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to League of Conservation Voters's position, Senator McCain received a rating of 0.
______________________________________________________________

Family and Children Issues


In 2007 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Children's Defense Fund's position, Senator Obama received a rating of 60.

In 2007 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Children's Defense Fund's position, Senator Webb received a rating of 90.

In 2007 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Children's Defense Fund's position, Senator McCain received a rating of 10.
________________________________________________________
(The Family Research Council is an extremely right-wing organization found and lead by Dr. Richard Dobson)

In 2007 Family Research Council gave Senator Obama a grade of 0.

In 2007 Family Research Council gave Senator Webb a grade of 0.

In 2007 Family Research Council gave Senator McCain a grade of 42.
_______________________________________________________________

Foreign Aid and Policy Issues


Senator Obama supported the interests of the Council for a Livable World 81 percent in 2007

Senator Webb supported the interests of the Council for a Livable World 72 percent in 2007.

Senator McCain supported the interests of the Council for a Livable World 0 percent in 2007.

______________________________________________________________________.

Health Issues


Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Academy of Family Physicians 100 percent in 2007.

Senator Webb supported the interests of the American Academy of Family Physicians 100 percent in 2007..

Senator McCain supported the interests of the American Academy of Family Physicians 0 percent in 2007
_____________________________________________________________________

Labor


Senator Obama supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2007.

Senator Webb supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2007.

Senator McCain supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 0 percent in 2007.
______________________________________________________________________

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 75 percent in 2007.

Senator Webb supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 75 percent in 2007.

Senator McCain supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 8 percent in 2007.
________________________________________________________________________

Liberal


Senator Obama supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 75 percent in 2007

Senator Webb supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 85 percent in 2007.

Senator McCain supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 10 percent in 2007.
_________________________________________________________________

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. But calling liberals a "fifth column waging war on American traditions." does
It's not just his record on women in the military (recent stuff too, not just the old article, which was bad enough). A couple of other issues I have with him as well:

His view (in 2000) that "affirmative action is state-sponsored racism,"

In 2004, Webb wrote an op-ed for USA Today arguing that John Kerry "deserved condemnation" for his opposition to the Vietnam War

Two articles that I think explain my opposition:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/14980312/virginia_senator_james_webb_washingtons_most_unlikely_revolutionary/print

http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/ixnay_on_the_ebbway.php

In short, I think he's great as a "loose cannon" senator, shaking things up. I don't think he's so great as a loose cannon vp nominee who could damage Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. So Webb is our (liberals) version of McCain, essentially?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. we NEED someone more conservative than Obama on the ticket
for the Independents.

I don't think he is that conservative, maybe moderate, but Obama is so liberal that someone needs to balance the ticket. (not that being so liberal is a bad thing, of course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Obama is a centrist
the last thing we need is someone even more conservative.


you make Obama sound like Kucinich. he is far from being that liberal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. you're saying Obama is moderate??
McCain is more moderate than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. McSame is not a moderate
voting 95-100% of the time with Bush is not a moderate, its a neocon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. never said he was moderate.
just said he was more moderate.

Obama is very liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Obama is against gay marriage,
Obama voted in favor of the Patriot Act, voted to fund the Iraq war every year despite claiming to be against it, as well as voting in favor of the Cheney energy bill.

Are you seriously trying to compare him to Kucinich? Obama is far from liberal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. just did a quick google, first result-
http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/

I don't agree hes the most liberal, but I think hes one of the most liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
45. Um, no. We (liberal Democrats) might consider him a centrist, but the rest of America
considers him a far-left liberal. The Repugs are going to be running ads 24-7 spouting off about how Obama is the senator with "the most liberal voting record."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. I disagree.
We may need someone who appeals to independents, but that doesn't mean a conservative ideology. The majority of people are on board with liberal stances on issues - - it seems to be about "image" and biography and being able to relate to someone. Webb may have some of that, but there are other (coughClarkcough) candidates who have that AND are liberal (coughClarkcough)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. why do you say "aside from NC"?
Barr is now pulling 6% in NC and Obama is only 3% behind

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_060208.pdf
Raleigh, N.C. – Now that the Libertarian Party is on the ballot in North Carolina, Bob Barr could have a real impact on the Presidential race in the state, according to the newest survey from Public Policy Polling.

Barr receives 6% of the vote in possible match ups with both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee. Obama trails John McCain 43-40, while Clinton trails him 39-34.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I just said that because I had already listed NC
I think of all the deep south states, NC might be the most competitive. I live in NC, so I'm very excited about that. :)

I'll try to reword the OP. That was kind of confusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenmaster Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Webb is my choice
I don't know if he's the best candidate to help in getting Obama elected, but Webb is who I hope becomes Obama's running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think he will play well in rural areas of PA, NC, and MO.
As well as VA those are the states he helps with. Also he was born in MO, so there's a connection there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. exactly, and if we do well in rural areas of NC, PA, and MO
we will win those states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. My take on Webb's influence
First, because he made some negative comments about women in the military in the past, you know the Republicans will use it to their advantage. No matter that he's changed his mind on the issue. It will be used against Obama and find fertile ground.

But there's a positive to Webb. He is of Scotts Irish heritage. He's written a book about it. These are the Borderer people who were always fighting with Britain. Think William Wallace - "Freedom!!!". They came here and populate our Appalachian region and as far as about Colorado to the west. After reading Joe Bageant's book, "Deer Hunting with Jesus", I'm convinced that Webb would have some serious clout reaching out to these people who have been a Republican voting block for some time. Bageant is also of the same heritage and explains a lot in his book abut why they vote the way they do.

I don't expect Webb to turn them on a dime to vote for Obama. In fact, I don't know if Webb would be a good choice for VP. Who would replace him in the Senate? Lawrence O'Donnell said that it would be almost impossible to replace Webb with another Dem in Virginia. But I have no doubt that he knows how to reach this voting block and will be an asset to the Dem Party and the 50 state strategy for years to come even if he isn't on the national ticket in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. what happens to Webb's senate seat if he goes vp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. Viginians will not vote for 3 Democratic Senators, two Dem Gov. AND a Dem President inside 4 years.
That is a bridge too far. If Webb wins VP, VA would go back to having one Dem Senator and it will be (DLC billionaire and NASCAR fan) Mark Warner. If anyone runs for Webb's seat they would probably be DLC because the Dem Party in the region is mostly Blue Dog or socially liberal DLC types. Those are the two wings of the Party in the region, in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. Webb has a female problem
Those articles will resurface and it'll become the "sexist ticket." I like Webb and think he would play very well in SE/NW ohio, as well as rural areas all across the country. But I am concerned about the prospect of losing 5-10% of female voters because they view the ticket as openly hostile towards them (despite it being false).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. you are correct, but I think the positives outweigh..
that negative (really the only one I can think of). plus, its a negative that is extremely old and has already been dealt with.

I understand though that the Republicans will come out and twist, but they will try to twist pretty much anything, so no VP will be safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. Women put Webb over the top in Virginia in 2006
Edited on Fri Jun-06-08 07:29 PM by Hippo_Tron
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/VA/S/01/epolls.0.html

Granted it's absolutely mind boggling how George Allen won 15% of the black vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Thats surprising
Also, Webb only winning the 18-29 bracket by 4%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #42
55. Allen got 15%?
Noose in the office, spray painted the rock in his HS "kill whitey", has insulted minorities every step of the way - George Allen got 15%?

Stupidity (or insanity) sure cuts across races.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. did Cheney help Bush win any state?
Cheney is from Wyoming, and Bush was a lock to get that state plus all the states that border it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. Webb is a former Republican. That's too close for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
49. I see another potential problem with Webb being VP
But its only applicable if Obama announces his pick before McCain does.

Lets say Obama picks Webb. The next news cycle, McCain and the RNC roll out all of Webbs baggage about women in the military, and then the following day McCain picks Sarah Palin to be his VP candidate.

That would be disastrous for Obama. Granted that Palin is very anti-choice and pretty much wrong on all the relevant issues, but Bush got 48% of the female vote last time around, anything that can tip that even higher in McCains favor is bad news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. 30 year-old-news is not going to get a whole lot of lasting traction
Edited on Sat Jun-07-08 02:04 AM by Douglas Carpenter
And given that Sen. McCain has a VERY BIG problem with the socially conservative base of the Republican Party -- do they really want to give free to publicity to their opponents who would tend to agree with things Sen. Webb said and once believed 30 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC