Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Best woman for the job could be a man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:48 PM
Original message
Best woman for the job could be a man
Edited on Fri Jun-06-08 12:53 PM by rebel with a cause
Commentary by Rebecca Walker:

KULA, Hawaii (CNN) -- Let's all breathe a collective sigh of relief, shall we? Now that we've got our nominee, Hillary can get some rest, Obama can read his daughters a bedtime story, and the rest of us can relax knowing our relative peace won't be shattered by another primary-related explosion.

<snip>

Obama has gracefully accepted the victory banner, and a lot of Hillary supporters, especially women, are walking off the field as if they've lost a war. I understand their frustration, but the truth is they didn't lose, not by a long shot. Their candidate is stronger than ever, with 17 million votes under her belt, and the public discussion about the role of gender is more nuanced and compelling than it has been in decades.

<snip>

But with a Democratic house divided, now is the time for healing, and this can only happen if Hillary's staunch female supporters let go of the reverse-sexist ideology that women are inherently better, wiser, and more compassionate leaders.

They will have to acknowledge that sometimes the best woman for the job is actually a man -- if it's the right man. Obama's vote against the war, marriage to his female mentor, outstanding record on reproductive choice and a host of other progressive issues, and his uncanny ability to inspire people all over the world suggest he's just that.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/06/walker/index.html




Personal: The article goes on to talk about what needs to be done and is a good (if not a 'must') read for most of us here on the DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. When you say "reverse sexism" you remind me of Ferraro.
It's just "sexism"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Those are not my words
those are those of the commentator. Oh I forgot the link. I will give it to you now.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/06/walker/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't like the term 'reverse-sexism' either.
Or 'reverse-racism'. The implication is that women or black people have equal ability to discriminate against the groups in power when they don't. Both racism and sexism are structural and institutional, as well as personal. Not to say that women can't be sexist or that black people can't be racist, just that those things cannot manifest themselves in the same way coming from them as they are used against them.

I prefer the term essentialist, to describe those who feel that women (or men) have innate characteristics that make them better suited for particular roles. Essentialism paints everyone with a broad brush and denies us our individuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good point
Now it's time for Hillary to become a team player
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This is not my writing
I just forgot to put the link in. The article is more than just about Obama and Clinton, it is about the healing and what needs to be done now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katmondoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am a woman and I never even as a child ever thought
I couldn't do what I wanted to do. I didn't feel I was at a disadvantage in the work place, I made enough money to be a single Mom and support my kids. This was in the '60's when women just did not do this. I had to work hard but then men have to work hard also to succeed. I don't understand these women who seem to claim sexisim when things do not go their way. I say to them maybe you have to change too. Of course I never aspired to be a fireman or a policeman or something that I wasn't ever going to be able to obtain. Being realistic and knowing your talents and limitations is important for any person to get ahead. Not everyone can be number one, not everyone can be a CEO, Women start to know yourself and know what you can do and then work on making yourself the best at whatever it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Personally, I think it is sexist to attribute certain characteristics
to a person just because of their gender. I've know some really mean, lowdown women--and some mean, lowdown men. I've known gentle, compassionate loving women--and gentle, compassionate, loving men. The wise person observes another person's actions before attributing certain attributes to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. When I was a little girl there was a cat that chose to have
her kittens either in our garage or under our hen house. Once the kittens were born, she would disappear, leaving the kittens to starve to death. Every time we would wait to see if she would come back and finally take the kittens and try to save them. They always died. That was when I learned, with help from my parents, that not every cat or woman was a nuturer. On the other hand, I have known men that in their marriage was the one that nutured the children. There is an old expression that says there are always exceptions to every rule. That's why we should not believe in stereotypes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not in my experience. In fact, everyone here is counting chickens n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC