Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

7 Constructive Ways to Influence the Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:05 AM
Original message
7 Constructive Ways to Influence the Media
First, full disclosure: I am a newspaper editor. I have been a reporter and an editor for more than 20 years in three states. I speak strictly for myself and will not name any papers I have worked at so that no one will construe that I speak for any newspaper. As a reporter and editor I have been involved in election and campaign coverage, though I now work for a part of the paper that has nothing to do with politics.

I have read the many comments from DUers ready to launch a jihad against the media with concern. Declaring holy war on the media might make you feel better, but you won’t accomplish much. There are ways to get your point across without calling someone a shill and a whore.

Someone in another thread wanted to know of such ways. So, here are some constructive ways to get your point across to the media and the public at large:

1. Write a Letter to the Editor: Most people already know this. But not everyone does it effectively. Letters should be short and to the point – long letters are edited down or not used at all. They should avoid personal attacks. Letters should avoid being generic – “Why I support John Kerry” – and should try to address topics of local concern as they relate to the Kerry campaign. For instance, if a company in your city is outsourcing 1,000 jobs, talk about how Kerry would stop such job losses. You can also write letters that reply to and refute letters written by Bush supporters – but, again, stick to facts and avoid potshots.

2. Email the reporter: You can send a letter to a newspaper/TV station about how biased they are but it won’t do much good. The editor likely has a stack of such letters as well as a stack of letters from Freepers denouncing him as a stooge of the Democratic Party. Better to send an email directly to the reporter covering the political beat. And don’t wait until you see something you hate and then send a nasty email. Try positive reinforcement – tell a reporter who writes a good story how much you liked it. And when you want to comment on a biased story, find something good to say at the same time: “I really liked what you said about Kerry doing such and such, but I was disappointed that you left out all the stuff about blah blah blah.”

3. Remember that there is a big difference between national reporters and local reporters: National reporters are assigned to cover a campaign full time. After a while, they get bored with hearing the same old speech from the candidate time after time. So they start to look for something, anything, that is different. This is how stuff gets reported that seems trivial compared to a speech. Local reporters haven’t heard the candidate before so it’s all fresh and interesting. Try comparing stories of a Kerry rally written by a national reporter to a local reporter and see if you can tell differences.

4. Crowd estimates: Few things generate more nasty letters than crowd estimates. Each side thinks they get screwed and usually they are all right. The standard rule for making a crowd estimate is to get the police to do it. That way it’s not the paper’s fault is the estimate is way off. Usually this involves a reporter walking up to a cop on crowd control duty and asking him to estimate the crowd size. The cop looks around a little and gives you a number. Nothing scientific about it at all. In fact, it is so inexact that some newspapers refuse to give crowd estimates other than “hundreds” or “thousands” unless the crowd fills an arena whose seating capacity is known. And some police departments will not permit officers to give estimates. So if your local paper/TV station is badly estimating crowds, write a letter to the police chief suggesting his department get out of the estimating business.

5. Look for non-traditional ways to get into the paper: A while ago there was a story about a woman who died and asked that in lieu of flowers, mourners make a campaign contribution to get rid of Bush. It got widespread coverage. There are many ways to get a political message across – society pages cover parties, so throw a Throw Out Bush party and send in a picture; sports sections often have separate letters to the editor columns, so write one about how your local team played so badly last night they must have been as unprepared as Bush going into Iraq.

6. Ask for a correction: Not a retraction, a correction. If you find something in the paper that is verifiably wrong, even in a wire service story, ask for a correction. A request for a correction is always taken seriously, even if it isn’t granted. If the story quotes Bush saying Kerry will raise taxes on the middle class, you won’t get a correction on that. If the story says Kerry voted in favor of going to war, you have a good shot at getting a correction. And if you get a correction, it will pretty much guarantee you won’t see the same thing in the paper again.

7. Offer story ideas: Reporters and editors are always looking for stories. If you can provide good ideas, you will have great influence. Look for the offbeat and unusual – do you know of a 90-year-old grandmother who has never voted but plans to vote for Kerry this year? How about a recent immigrant who just became a citizen and plans to cast his first vote for Kerry? How about a 7-year-old who is donating all the proceeds from his lemonade stand to help defeat Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you. I'm passing it on to my email list. We're learning
how to communicate better with the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. great ideas. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. if I may....
....add a couple of suggestions to these fine ones:

1. Attend editorial meetings if your newspaper allows such a thing. Or seek a position on the editorial board of your local paper.

2. Promote the idea of a citizens bill of rights for media. A prototype concerning access of the press to the WH is available at http://webdems.blogspot.com -- down at the bottom of the blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Everything you write may be true,
Edited on Sun Aug-15-04 03:38 AM by Leilani
but Freepers & organized right wing groups have used much harsher methods than you suggest, & have been very successful.

Just a few of their results:
1. Bill Maher lost his nightly show, which was very popular.
2. Whoopi Goldberg lost her commercial endorsement for Slim Fast
3. Tim Robbins appearance for Bull Durham was cancelled at Baseball
Hall of Fame
4. Phil Donahue Show on MSNBC cancelled before Iraq War

And I could go on. But these are only 4 results of Freeper campaigns targeted at advertisers & corporations.

A nice story about a 90 year old grandmother will do NOTHING to change major media bias against Democrats. We must be organized & threaten loss of profits. Money is the only language that speaks to the media these days.

Because of media concentration, if we can get the attention of AOL-Time-Warner, we will have achieved our goal, & we may see results.

Edited to add: There are many fine journalists & reporters. Aaron Brown at CNN is a great example of what is right at CNN. I have written often to him, to compliment a particular story. And when I write to CNN to complain about biased reporting, I use Brown & Lou Dobbs to tell them I appreciate fine journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Those four examples
Were not the result of sustained popular campaigns by conservatives, as I recall. Robbins had gotten death threats, I believe, and the first two were corporate decisions over something they said. But I could be wrong on that.

There are certainly other examples of the likes of Donald Wildmon influencing advertisers, etc.

Liberals are starting to fight back more agressively also. The cmapaign to get Rush off Armed Services Radio is an example.

No, a story about a grandmother won't change corporate culture but it is something everyone can do individually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Another example (one of the best) is the Ronald Reagan movie . . .
that CBS caved into the right wing and would not show it. Show Time played it and James Brolin is up for an Emmy Award for his performance.

Fox News' O'Reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh went overboard about the movie. There was nothing to that movie and it did not make ANYONE look bad, nor did it take advantage of Reagan's current condition with Alzheimer's Disease.

Now if the Republicans and their talking heads can get a movie off a major network by complaining and threatening the sponsors with a boycott, (matter of fact, sponsors were dropping like flies anyway if I remember correctly), then why shouldn't the Democrats.

I'll tell you why . . . like Jerry Falwell said at his last service of The Old Time Gospel Hour (sic), "Liberals and Democrats are not Christians, they are the abortionists, murders of innocent little babies; the homosexuals, groups like the ACLU, NAACP, People for the United Way, etc; the African Americans as well as other minorities and teach them that the government will take care of them through welfare and socialist programs and try to keep them from being contributors to society. (Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that OUR money? OUR Taxes that they keep blowing? Not that I'm saying anyone should depend on welfare; however, sometimes due to circumstances that is no one's fault, someone could use some help until they get on their feet. Isn't that what it is for anyway).

Rev. Falwell even commented on them threatening to take his non-tax status away. He was laughing and so was the audience and applauding him. He tells his congregation that from now until election time that they are going to hear all kinds of terrible things about him, I watch this every Sunday as I live in VA; and this man stands at a pulpit and tells people "if they are Christians like he is, that they are not going to vote for the abortionists." I have not yet hear him preach from the Bible. I keep hoping but all he talks about is his politics and President Bush with his morals, etc., etc. Of course, he has his services at Liberty University and there are young and old staring up at this man in awe just nodding there heads to whatever he says.

Sorry, got off the point here. I would just like to know what the Republican Party did to get those sponsors to drop their commercials during the movie? I would like to know if they wrote the station or called in or both? Personally, I think it was the media itself that got hold of this story and kept on and on and it was due to their continued coverage of the issue.

Just look what happened to Howard Dean. They played his "yee hah" and played it over and over and over until it turned into something ugly instead of just enthusiasm.

We have somehow over time given the media far more power than it should have. Especially with the 24-hour-news stations. I think the reporting has gotten totally out of hand with their biased reports. Then you have your talking heads on the radio. These are the really bad eggs. They do not check facts and sit there and lie to their listeners and then the listeners, as some of them never take the time to check out the facts (just like journalists nowadays), and believe everything that comes out of their mouths. Just listen to Limbaugh or Hannity one day. Then the next morning, watch Washington Journal on CSPAN that starts at 7 a.m. When they have the open phones, the so-called Republicans will call in and almost verbatim parrot these two. It's probably a blessing to them . . . now they don't even have to think for themselves. They are TOLD what their opinion is and that is what they believe. It's amazingly scary how easily they are mislead.

It's great to have someone that is an actual journalist as a member. And it's also great advice he has given and does make more sense. However, I don't think it will change anything. Democrats are always ignored. Could it be because EVERYONE thinks like Falwell does about liberal Democrats? Maybe, maybe not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. GREAT suggestions!!
Thanks for posting this! I'm nominating it for the home page. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks. I will pass this on to local Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I find it helpful to discuss media errors and inaccuracies with friends
and family.

Sowing the seeds of critical thinking.

I find that very helfpful.

And support your arguments about the media with facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. How often are
you likely to get published on the op/ed page? I got something published a few weeks ago. Should I even bother submitting a new piece this week? I am pressed for time (who isn't) and I don't want to spend allot of time composing ltte's if they have no chance of being published.

Thanks for the info. I will pass it on to my email list. I am also thinking of organizing a media watch/letter writing group in my city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I would imagine that that depends on the paper in question.
In my local paper, they post the 'letters to the editor' rules once a week, I think. I'm going by memory because that section of the paper is currently under the rear end of my parrot. He is in bed and I'm not about to wake him now. LOL.

The rules that I can remember off the top of my head are that you can only be published once a month. Your letter cannot be a 'form' letter that has been going around, either in other newspapers or on line. It can only be so long in length. You have to provide your contact information. After that, I'm drawing a blank. Hey, it's late, I had a long, bad day. This is pretty good considering I'm using a tired, old brain. LOL.
So check your local editorial section and see if they post the 'rules' for your paper. And good luck getting published again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. ATTENTION DU ADMIN. These are excellent ideas. Why not have
Edited on Mon Aug-16-04 01:23 PM by Hoping4Change
a separate Forum: "Ways to Effectively Fight the Media."


A separate Forum would store suggestions such as these in a readily available area.



As well as suggestions, DUers could post actions they undertake to combat RW bias in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. thats a good idea. i would like to see an activist forum or resource on du
there has been multiple powerful and effective advice given whether thats about contacting media or protesting in nyc but then of course the thread is invariably lost

to that end, du perhaps should have an "activist" center or clearinghouse of some sorts that addresses these types of issues. because there are multiple ways that people want to get involved.
i just saw a thread from someone who wanted to volunteer with their local democratic hq and hadnt heard anything back after giving her information initially over the phone.

there are many ways we can be involved so a center for this information would be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunarboy13 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. excellent post...
Thanks for the great ideas!

I have one other question, however. How do you get a news source to investigate or report on a story they are not covering?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. a recent success story
The unabashed whore, Richard W. Stevenson, claimed casualties were abating since the handover. An ugly lie involving American lives.

They finally corrected the "error," and more important, they know people are paying attention.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=109x12018

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tngledwebb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
16.  Good suggestions, but the problem is....
most Americans get their 'news' from TV. No matter how may LTE's we send, those network 'news' sources require massive reform. The FCC laws need revision now, so we have finally get a national, taxpayer funded (no corporate sponsorship), TV and radio network, along the lines of the BBC. We can dump or re-do PBS and NPR as needed. And only these PUBLIC airways should be allowed to broadcast political debates or to air party political messages, and no commercial stations will show attack ads, or re-run Howard Dean yelling, or Reagan's funeral ad infinitum. All networks including Fox, CNN, etc. will be subject to independent oversight to ensure fairness and accuracy. Westinghouse and GE or similar military industrial entities will not be able to own TV stations full stop. Until that day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. dunno if I'm willing to die to get some coverage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. Those are good suggestions
But I completely disagree that directing complaints TO and AT the media doesn't do any good (The Freepers have proven that time and time again)

Carville recently encouraged people to go after the media on Crossfire (a few weeks ago)and as far as I am concerned he has quite a track record for making savvy political moves and effecting change.

When I "bombard" the media obviously I don't call them whores and swear at them.

I do strongly state in plain language that I feel they are allowing their reporters (or anchors) to opine, instead of report.

I watched Chad Myers one morning on CNN (a weatherman) defending the bush tax cuts.

Why is a weatherman commenting on tax cuts? His job is to report weather -- not present bush campaign talking points, so why wouldn't I write to CNN and express my outrage over the event?

Media is selling something and we are the consumers.

If I have a problem with the quality of a product, or the unprofessional performance of the company employee presenting it (selling it) to me, I complain, so why should media companies be exempt from that same standard?

As far as I am concerned the whole media industry has become so arrogant, that it's as though we just aren't supposed to "go there"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC