Its become pretty embarrassing to continue hearing Hillary Clinton's repetitious speech menu that consists of a steady diet of " I'm more qualified & prepared to be Commander and Chief than Obama " diatribe when in fact, he snookered her from the get-go of these campaigns and she or Bill didn't even see him coming.
Now, call it whatever you want to call it, but from where I'm standing, I see Obama as a candidate who came here to play hard and win and he wasn't taking any prisoners. I see a candidate who did his homework and came prepared and trusted & allowed his campaign strategist to unveil a stealthy iron-clad ground-game with precise patience.
He is definitely a force to be reckoned with and has made all these unfounded claims of " lack of leadership or experience " against him by Hillary become moot. How can she continue with the same tired rhetoric against Obama when in fact, it is HER, HILLARY & The CLINTON Machine he has beaten, the very same person claiming to have all this talent and experience to lead and command this nation into the future, yet, she & Bill were caught with their pantsuits down and now the chase is all but lost and over in the coming days. There is a lot more to leadership than just going about town pounding a single message into everyone's nugget that you can lead and are more experienced than your opponent but then you allowed yourself to be snookered by the very same rookie you've been criticizing all this time. One thing for sure, Obama WON'T be snoozing away when the call comes in at 3:00am, but I can't say the same for Hillary,.......that I can't.
Excerpt:
" WASHINGTON (AP) -
Unlike Hillary Rodham Clinton, rival Barack Obama planned for the long haul. Clinton hinged her whole campaign on an early knockout blow on Super Tuesday, while Obama's staff researched congressional districts in states with primaries that were months away. What they found were opportunities to win delegates, even in states they would eventually lose.
Obama's campaign mastered some of the most arcane rules in politics, and then used them to foil a front-runner who seemed to have every advantage—money, fame and a husband who had essentially run the Democratic Party for eight years as president.
"Without a doubt, their understanding of the nominating process was one of the keys to their success," said Tad Devine, a Democratic strategist not aligned with either candidate. "They understood the nuances of it and approached it at a strategic level that the Clinton campaign did not."
Careful planning is one reason why Obama is emerging as the nominee as the Democratic Party prepares for its final three primaries, Puerto Rico on Sunday and Montana and South Dakota on Tuesday. Attributing his success only to soaring speeches and prodigious fundraising ignores a critical part of contest.
Obama used the Democrats' system of awarding delegates to limit his losses in states won by Clinton while maximizing gains in states he carried. Clinton, meanwhile, conserved her resources by essentially conceding states that favored Obama, including many states that held caucuses instead of primaries.
In a stark example, Obama's victory in Kansas wiped out the gains made by Clinton for winning New Jersey, even though New Jersey had three times as many delegates at stake. Obama did it by winning big in Kansas while keeping the vote relatively close in New Jersey.
The research effort was headed by Jeffrey Berman, Obama's press-shy national director of delegate operations. Berman, who also tracked delegates in former Rep. Dick Gephardt's presidential bids, spent the better part of 2007 analyzing delegate opportunities for Obama.
Obama won a majority of the 23 Super Tuesday contests on Feb. 5 and then spent the following two weeks racking up 11 straight victories, building an insurmountable lead among delegates won in primaries and caucuses.
What made it especially hard for Clinton to catch up was that Obama understood and took advantage of a nominating system that emerged from the 1970s and '80s, when the party struggled to find a balance between party insiders and its rank-and-file voters.cont'
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91018RO0&show_article=1