|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ej510 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:24 PM Original message |
Hillary will most likely end up on the ticket. Randi Rhodes made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. It ain't gonna happen. Randi is as wrong on this as she was in her initial support of Hillary. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
86. She didn't support Hillary initially. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well if Obama can make peace with Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think it's going to be Rod Parsley. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not .gonna.happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ej510 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. He talked about how Linoln put all of his most fierce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. The Cabinet is one thing. Putting your chief rival as next in line of succession is another. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Ding, ding, we have a winner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. She is going to undermine him, regardless of her position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:37 PM Original message |
Bad for a Cabinet position, too. She can do much damage to undermine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
60. Deleted message |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #60 |
83. Didn't you know? The Clintons can make all manner of things happen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
114. Did Lincoln put John Wilkes Booth in his cabinet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oceansaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. it's starting to seem inevitable.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. Nope. Nice prestigious Cabinet post for her, nice prestigious Ambassadorship for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. It would make ME happy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. but it would not make most of the Obama supporters happy...there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 06:32 PM Response to Reply #50 |
101. So Obama is scared of Bill and Hill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #50 |
122. Did you read my post? I was talking about a Cabinet post for Hillary & Ambassadorship for Bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
70. If it did... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
123. I'm glad. I don't see why this can't be resolved with everyone's dignity intact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Speck Tater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. How About HRC, Ambassador to Antartica? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. why say something negative like that when the poster you responded to has said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
124. People have a hard time resisting feeding their angry wolf. Thanks for speaking up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:56 AM Response to Reply #124 |
137. I agree and I think a good ambassadorship or some recognition would help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:34 PM Original message |
The penguins would revolt. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. It would make me happy :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
110. But it would energize the Republican base, which is otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #110 |
128. What? A Cabinet post and an Ambassadorship will stir the GOP base? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Probably--I was responding to the one about how Hillary on the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. I like your argument for the Supreme Court position quite a bit, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
126. Sounds like kind of good idea then, don't you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
46. I bet he would choose to be ambassador to Holland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
103. It would make me very happy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
109. maybe he could put her on the SC. Wouldn't that make Right Wing hesds explode? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arrowhead2k1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's not up to the Superdelegates as to who's VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. You're right, it is up to all delegates to determine who becomes VP, not just SDs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
104. And just under half of those delegates are pledged to Clinton. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
73. Edit. Answer Already Posted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WA98296 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. There are those of us who will not vote for her as part of any ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WA98296 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. One more thing, Hartmann is going down that road too -- they are trying to SOFTEN US to the idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
113. Not me, either. I'm very disappointed in Hartmann--after Hillary brought up.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Great, more "McCain Democrats" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:34 PM Original message |
I feel that exact same way--she is a neocon, a liar, a manipulative inflluence peddler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
34. I feel the same way as you. I will write Kucinich in and vote dem down-ticket. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
63. So you're not a Democrat either, I see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #63 |
82. I'm a Democrat, but not a slave to it. Hillary is no "Democrat" (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. So you might as well go ahead and change your avatar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #87 |
100. blah blah blah, whatever. bitter much? "my own" candidate is not my ruler, either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #100 |
138. I don't give two shits whether she's on the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
62. So you're NOT a Democrat ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
75. Dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. "starting to seem inevitable". ROFL! nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. We may as well get used to it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. I don't think so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Just trying to cover all the bases, here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panAmerican (864 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
15. Nope; Obama sans Clinton for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
17. Not after she invoked racism and assassination in this campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
77. She Never Invoked Assassination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #77 |
98. riiiiiiight! if you don't count the words that come out of her own mouth!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. Randi is wrong and misguided. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Most candidates walk into the room with enough delegates to control the Convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
43. How is it different? He's only 48 delegates short. And the SD's are coming... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
91. Obama can't win the GE without Hillary's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:54 PM Response to Reply #91 |
121. O.K., I'll bite and take these in turn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent-Voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. There's no way in hell that Veruca ends up on the ticket. None |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
22. That would be a deal breaker for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. THAT'S your reason for voting for Obama? You hate for Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. I don't "hate" the Clintons...more like massive contempt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
57. What if Obama has no choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. I find it hard to believe that the delegates would foist Clinton on Obama if he resisted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. It might take a LOT of resistance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
111. He could threaten to decline the nomination. Checkmate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #57 |
67. Again, I don't think this will happen. I can't imagine the delegates going against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
65. Yet another non-Democrat for Obama ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. I've been a Democrat since 1966. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #66 |
78. You're the one who said you won't support the Democratic nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Describe a "real" Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Then you're in good company. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #65 |
89. since you're keeping track, put me on that list as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Will you be leaving DU if BHO/HRC is the ticket? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. no, but i won't vote for a clinton ticket. period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. We do not need that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
26. Sir, would you like a pile of dogshit on your steak.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
44. It would be nice to have some steak with my dogshit once in a while, at least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
styersc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
29. Obama does not need Hillary or her 17 million votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. the Operation Chaos voters included in that "17 million" will be voting GOP anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
styersc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #42 |
97. When you say "Real Dems" I hope that we aren't counting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #42 |
105. The poster you are replying to forgot the sarcasm thingy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #29 |
112. Absolutely Correct. Those 17 Million Votes are Water Under the Bridge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bensthename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
30. We do not want Hill and Bill F'ing up Obama's campaign like they did theirs. NO WAY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
35. When was it said that the party owed her and Bill anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
36. Not going to happen. The Clinton's are Done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
37. Deleted sub-thread |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
38. She wouldn't be my favorite choice, but if he thinks it's the way to go, I trust him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. The thesis of the OP is that it won't be his choice; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
95. Ah, I see. No, against Obama's wishes would not carry good will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ericgtr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
41. Cool.. Take it and send her ass on several goodwill missions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
45. I will never vote Democrat again. Bunch of phonies ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wvbygod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
47. Randi is good for a laugh or disgust at times but she is no more human than we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
49. You bet. A one-way ticket to Palookaville. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
51. Nope, I can't see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
52. No. It won't happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alwysdrunk (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
53. Impossible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
54. No way...it's the kiss of death.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
55. With what happened in the 2000 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
56. Well, she's wrong..think Assassination comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
59. Dream on. Randi and all others. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike L (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
61. So BO will cave in to superdelegates' extortion? em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. He might, since THEY have the power to determine the nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #61 |
79. It's Not Up To BO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
remember2000forever (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
69. I Love Randi But...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
71. The nastier the divide... the more likely this will come to pass... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
72. I've Said Very Much The Same Thing. If She Wants It, If She Demands It, It's Hers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #72 |
119. You've already been proved wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:28 PM Response to Reply #119 |
131. Oy Vey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
76. The Bunny Boiler just won't be a net positive for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
84. Obama won't let Ms. "Subliminal Assassination Meme" on his ticket. He's not dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
85. I certainly hope not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
88. Two words: HIGH NEGATIVES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
90. As Obama says, he's a practical minded guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bright Eyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
94. I would hate the idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
96. 2 points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ej510 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. It makes me sick to my stomach. Thinking about her fuckin up the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. God damn it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #102 |
116. She also said all he has is a speech. I think that adds up to less qualified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #102 |
134. Why do you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
106. It's a great idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #106 |
117. Aren't you one of the folks that damned Rhodes for her stand up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. I don't know who "you guys" are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
107. I think we should be open and willing to any tactics that get us into the White |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
108. After her Friday remark, no matter how one takes it, I don't see how she could be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
115. No. He CANNOT pick her and keep his legitimacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
120. Who else you gonna get. Richardson? That's a real prize. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
125. Superdelegates like Bill Richardson? Ted Kennedy? john Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
127. Regardless of who says what, the choice of Number Two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
130. LOL, I saw this very same theoretical situation floated here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
133. They might try, but I don't think Obama will go along with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-27-08 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
135. Rassmussen poll results released on 5/23 show why Obama needs HRC on the ticket if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
136. It would be the only way that I would vote for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC