Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Camp Stokes RFK Flap by Blaming Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:28 PM
Original message
Clinton Camp Stokes RFK Flap by Blaming Obama
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign accused Sen. Barack Obama's campaign of fanning a controversy over her describing the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy late in the 1968 Democratic primary as one reason she is continuing to run for the presidency.

"The Obama campaign ... tried to take these words out of context," Clinton campaign chairman Terence R. McAuliffe said on "Fox News Sunday." "She was making a point merely about the time line."

The issue is particularly sensitive given longstanding concerns about Obama's safety as a presidential candidate. (He first received Secret Service protection last May.) The Obama campaign called Clinton's words unfortunate and circulated a TV commentary criticizing them, although Obama himself said Saturday that he took Clinton at her word that she meant no harm.

(snip)

Appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation", Clinton senior strategist Howard Wolfson said McAuliffe is "absolutely right" that Clinton didn't want to apologize to Obama for the remark and said: "I think it was unfortunate to attack Senator Clinton's remarks without knowing fully what she had said."

McAuliffe said Clinton is staying in the race to give hope to the millions of women who have voted for her and "she is winning races." And the campaign chairman made clear that his boss would strongly consider pressing on if the Democratic National Committee does not allow Florida and Michigan delegates to vote at the party's convention this summer -- a decision that would boost Clinton's delegate total. The DNC's rules and bylaws committee is scheduled to meet Saturday to discuss the issue.

"We are prepared to fight this so that all 50 states are included, that the delegates be seated. Let's have no questions about that. This race is still very close," McAuliffe said.

Wolfson said the campaign believes the DNC will reinstate Florida and Michigan "100 percent. That's what they should do. That will obviously help us, but it's the right thing to do."

The Obama campaign, meanwhile, delivered a strong signal that it expects the nomination contest to wrap up in the next 10 days, after the final primaries.

"We expect on June 3rd that this process will come to an end," Obama senior strategist David Axelrod said on ABC's "This Week."


link: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-talk/2008/05/clinton_camp_stokes_rfk_flap_b.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. June 3, Hill.
Then you're done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 8 Days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyounkin Donating Member (722 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You mean politically, right?
Politically- I hope she just goes away- and takes Bill with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's gotta be someone's fault, but not Clinton's.
They should have just come out with a pure apology and then STFU about it. Wouldn't moving on have been the better communications strategy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. When , in this campaign have they made the better decision?
They always chose wrong. Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I have nothing to add here. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Despicable but not unexpected n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ah, Terry "the rules are the rules" McAuliffe.
Dude takes shameless hypocrisy to astounding levels.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/25/165935/668/909/503541

"Carl, take it to the bank," I said. "They will not get a credential. The closest they'll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules. If you want to call my bluff, Carl, you go ahead and do it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jesus H. Christ. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. So if I defend myself from a false accusation, I'm "stoking" the issue?
The wingnuts over at Free Republic are more objective and fair-minded than many of the Obama lovers on this board.

In fact, sometimes I suspect that the Clinton-haters are really the nastiest Freepers, who are pretending to be Democrats and pretending to like Obam for the sole purpose of destroying Hillary.

By their works you will know them. The work of Hillary-haters is division, hatred, anger, resentment, character assassination and paranoid sanctimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Where's the false accusation?
Hillary used this meme no less than 3 times. It finally got picked up by the press. Obama's camp wants this line of reasoning to stop.

It all makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Wow. Talk about projection.
Pathetic. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Clinton didn't want to apologize to Obama" and she never did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. And the NYT is reporting the Kennedy's (excluding RFK) are furious over her comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. RFK, jr. must have a sweet deal lined up with them
to stick with them and defend this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. He was in line to get her Senate seat if she got the WH
I guess he's a guy who doesn't renege on a deal, no matter how bad it sours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Love that logo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. She shot herself in the foot, and stuck it in her mouth.....
Obama's fault!

She's the victim!

:shrug: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Unfuckingreal!
Edited on Sun May-25-08 11:07 PM by TahitiNut
"... Clinton's campaign accused Sen. Barack Obama's campaign of fanning a controversy ..."
Whaaa? How? By giving her a pass and the benefit of any doubt? By saying nothing more? The get McAuliffe AND Wolfson on the tube COMPLAINING and then claim it's Obama's fault? What fucking "through the looking glass" universe to these deluded, fun-house, idiots live in???

" ... staying in the race to give hope to the millions of women who have voted for her ..."
Huh? How about the men who've voted for her?? Cannon fodder? Back of the bus?? WHO'S the "sexist" asshole now, Terry??? What about ALL of the American people you blithering IDIOT?

Axelrod acknowledged, "There's an enormous amount of pride and investment in Senator Clinton among millions of women across this country," and that unifying the party after a tense nomination contest will produce "some tumult in the short run."
It's "official." It's not about people ... it's about crotches. :eyes:


These self-serving, power-hungry, bigoted, arrogant bastards should just STFU.

:grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. so it's Obama's fault
and Hillary thinks she is the victim of being taken out of context.

of course, after the whole "bitter" thing, which was her campaign platform in Pennsylvania, all I can say is:

Karma's a bad word. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC