Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fifteen years of death threads against the Clintons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:05 AM
Original message
Fifteen years of death threads against the Clintons
http://www.beggarscanbechoosers.com/labels/Bill%20Clinton.html

Right-wing nutcase Michael Graham's latest controversy---in which he said he wanted to see someone "whack" the Clintons in a Sopranos spoof isn't the first time he's used violent rhetoric when discussing the Clintons. In 2003, Graham said of Hillary Clinton: "I wanted to bludgeon her with a tire iron."

Such inflammatory language is nothing new for the right-wing. Recall how Ann Coulter once wrote that the debate over Bill Clinton should be about "whether to impeach or assassinate."

Recall also the comment by Jesse Helms in 1994: "Mr. Clinton better watch out if he comes down here. He'd better have a bodyguard."

Or G. Gordon Liddy's comment in 1995, when discussing how he'd used stick figures of the Clintons for target practice. "Thought it might improve my aim," he said.

I guess the right-wing nutcases excuse the above inflammatory comments as "humor."

The problem is, the Secret Service isn't an organization known for its sense of humor.

What's baffling is that right-wing nutcases can continue to use violent inflammatory language when discussing the Clintons and face no repercussions.

But when you talk about George W. Bush these days, you really need to watch what you say. Or else, you're going to get a visit from the Secret Service.


Given damned near 15 years of that vicious crap, WHY would Hillary even consider using the tern "assassination" during her campaign at all, never mind how long ago 1968 was? This is an ongoing situation--both Obama and Clinton have received death threats during this campaign. This is not a matter for casual conversation a la Clinton, or even sick joking a la Fuckerbee.

http://rodonline.typepad.com/rodonline/2007/05/hillary_clinton.html

The race to the White House becomes more competitive and much more dangerous. The two leading Democratic presidential candidates are now walking around with increased Secret Service protection after being targeted by death threats.

NY1 reports authorities have arrested a first year student at Louisiana State University and charged him with planning a terrorist-style attack against Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY).

Nineteen year-old Richard Wargo is being held on $1 million bond after authorities say he asked classmates to help him carry out the attack, and, they found evidence in his dorm room to back him his claims. As a former First Lady, the senator has routine Secret Service protection.

Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is now under 24/7 Secret Service protection—the earliest ever for a presidential candidate—after receiving numerous racist death threats. The most recent was found on a white supremacist website and prompted the senator's campaign to request the protection. "I wished we lived in a country where that is not a problem, but it still is," says Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), an Obama confidante. said. "The fact that Barack Obama is such a highly visible African-American candidate, I think increases his vulnerability."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Our Lady of Perpetual Victimhood and her husband have been INTIMIDATING both democrats
Edited on Sat May-24-08 05:13 AM by ShortnFiery
and republicans since 1989.

Time to wake up and smell the "bigotry" that is demonstrated by the Clinton's use of the drag and drop "Southern Strategy" promoted by KKKarl Rove. In particular, it's the "feigned indignation" that's been honed to a fine science by
The Clinton Machine.
:wow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oRwZQLdhEw

On edit: Here's more proof - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5oMw2mC7EE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm still not going to let rightwing whackjobs off the hook--
--even though Clinton seems to be more interested in going after Obama than going after the wingnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh, that's laudable, we should never let the right wing "get over" but when those who claim to be us
- Democrats begin to use the tactics of the GOP (FEAR and SMEAR), then we need to make it clear "to them" to CLEAN IT UP or get out of our beloved Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, my comparison of Clinton to Patty Hearst yesterday went over like a lead balloon
Granted, the analogy applies only in one narrow area, but still the thought of taking on the tactics of those who have slandered and verbally abused you is really unpleasant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Robert Kennedy Jr. issued the following statement this evening:
“It is clear from the context that Hillary was invoking a familiar political circumstance in order to support her decision to stay in the race through June. I have heard her make this reference before, also citing her husband's 1992 race, both of which were hard fought through June. I understand how highly charged the atmosphere is, but I think it is a mistake for people to take offense.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. So, what's his take on the other two times Clinton mentioned assassination? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Total nonsense
worthy of the worst r/w shill from the mid 1990's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franks Wild Years Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Her comments....
...sill leave me incredulous. Anyone who makes death threats against any other human being, however horrible they may, is sick. Clearly she should know that better than most given some of the disgusting threats made towards her and her family.

While she didn't make a threat herself, simply throwing the notion that "hey! it could happen!" out there in he way that she did (again) was a vile, despicable thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. So how does that excuse hillary's comment yesterday?
At the very least it was incredibly stupid and grossly insensitive. I've argued that that's exactly what it was. If you can't acknowledge that, you need to take a look at the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It doesn't. IMO it makes them worse than ever n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
12.  Did you really mean " death threads" in your subject line or
is it a typo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh s**t! Edit time has expired. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC