Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Purple Heart" qualifications

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:20 AM
Original message
"Purple Heart" qualifications
The next time a Repub or well-meaning relative says one of Kerry's purple hearts isn't legit because it was "self inflicted," remind them of these qualifications of recieving a Purple Heart:

Individuals wounded or killed as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" will be awarded the Purple Heart as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.

(From AR 600-8-22, 25 February 1995 and Public Law 104-106 - Feb. 10, 1996, http://www.purpleheart.org/Awd_of_PH.htm)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. What now?
Are the repubs claiming that Kerry shot himself to get out of the service?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. some have...
..others say that the shrapnel was a richochet from either his bullit or from a grenade he through and, thus, the Purple Heart isn't legitimate.

But the law says differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the Kelly Gang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. one qualification is you have to BE there instead of AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You do not give yourself a medal
You must have it given to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great editorial by Col. Hackworth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Salon brought out this issue in April 2004. Check out this letter. . .
"The assholes who talk trash about Kerry's Purple Hearts are playing a dangerous, self-destructive game."

Link:
http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/2004/04/17/kerry_purple/

Link:
http://archive.salon.com/opinion/letters/2004/04/22/purple_mercenary/

(snip)
Folks, three things:

1. I don't recall anyone putting himself in for a Purple Heart. Mine arrived via shopping cart while I was bed-bound at a Quang Tre MASH. I didn't know that guys could ask for them. I did turn down two additional PHs once I got back to the States. (Or maybe they tried to give me the first medal two more times.) That pissed people off; the brass like to give out medals. So on that score alone, Hibbard's got shit in his mouth. He would have been a mighty proud lifer to have one of his boys rack a PH.

2. Concerning fakes: If any fuckhead is stupid enough to claim ownership of a PH that does not belong to him, there's a big cottage industry of really nasty people who will take pleasure in making his life one definitive hell. These would be the folks who actually earned Purple Hearts. Fakers get confronted in public, in front of their families, their co-workers, their Boy Scout troops, wherever it's possible to inflict the most humiliation. There's no sympathy for these people. So if Kerry had worked some kind of game on a Purple Heart, he would have been hideously outed long before this. There's an army of war vets (and the widows of war vets) with nothing better to do than to hunt down fakes and frauds. Kerry would have been toast in the '70s, courtesy of his work with the VVAW.

3. Regardless of politics, those who have PHs tend to be clannish. They're not nearly as exclusive as the CMH crowd but their ties go well beyond Bill Mauldin's club "of them what's been shot at." (Mauldin was actually sheepish about his PH.) So when a drug addicted coward like Limbaugh, or any of those other vermin, talks trash about a guy's Purple Heart, he's insulting the rest of us. It's like taking on a biker gang that graduated from grenades and machine guns to lawsuits, Web sites and political campaigns. Same attitude, different toys.

-- Dave Dike

(snip)

much more...

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC