Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Clinton campaign HAS hurt our party, and our chances in the General Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:45 PM
Original message
The Clinton campaign HAS hurt our party, and our chances in the General Election
Edited on Tue May-13-08 05:48 PM by Levgreee
they have personally created a variety of splinter issues, such as Florida and Michigan, Unity ticket or bust, and belittling/lying about Obama's stances on issues(choice, health care, the economy... oh, he is in it for the big oil companies, he didn't accept the gas tax), making him an unacceptable alternative to some voters.


Hillary's campaign has progressively lost more and more inhibitions as this race went on, and they HAVE gone to such an extreme that they have created division where there could have been good feelings and unity. They are single-handedly making our party disfunctional as we go into the General Election... there is a good chance we can recover, but I think there's some chance we might not, and a very good chance that at least some lasting damage was done.

Fortunately, Obama's bringing in of new voters will assuage that damage somewhat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree, and that is my biggest problem with Hillary now.
I had some issues with her before, but if she'd run this campaign with any kind of class, I think I would have gotten over those. I really wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the same thing that they are doing has happened to me with addictions... you push barriers
Edited on Tue May-13-08 05:51 PM by Levgreee
past the point where you have damaged yourself. You rationalize some of the poor decisions you make, rationalize the damage done as being fine, it's not THAT bad. And you only notice the damage done a bit afterwards, and in retrospect realize you should never have been so rash and inconsiderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Summer of 41 Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
64. Obama played the race card with "fairy tale"
How was that class?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. Bill is the one who used that
"fairy tale" crap in regards to Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's hogwash, the party is stronger than ever. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wvbygod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Got it backwards
The Obama campaign and his highbrow supporters looking down upon Hillary
voters and those designated a lesser class has created a great rift that
only Hillary can mend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Rampant sexism and ageism is good for the party.
Edited on Tue May-13-08 07:35 PM by aquart
Not to mention sneering at anyone who does blue collar or non-executive work. Yes, Obama is a uniter not a divider.

Why don't the snotty rich kids like Hillary? Because she actually had to work for her degrees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
56. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. You're just putting that out there early so if Obama loses in
November, the good old Clintons can be blamed for that, too!

Not buying it.

Our party is strong. Our party is energized. I'm PROUD to be a Democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. hahaha
i think that as well. should obama lose in november it will be all hillarys fault.

the same way every other ailment known to mankind is hillarys fault. if she would just go on television and give a speech where she admits that she doesn't deserve to live, and that she wears ugly pantsuits and that she killed vince foster and that she's a lesbian, and that obama is by far the superior candidate and her supporters who don't vote for him are racists. then everything would be forgiven.

unless obama were to lose in november and then it would be all her fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
46. they will be blamed. there isn't a person in the media who hasn't already
put this forward and I personally will never forgive her. Some of us took great personal hits in our lives defending these two asses. what the hell did we do that for? FOR THIS?! this is bullshit and she will be blamed. And she earns it if it happens. Which it won't. We will win it all this year and Barack will be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #46
62. my golly, aren't the clintons powerful. 2 people who can stop america from electing the president
Edited on Wed May-14-08 03:45 AM by VotesForWomen
it 'really' wants!!??? gee, that's... well... hard to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Though I have backed off some on a "primary focus", of late, I disagree.
I think the simple historic demographic accomplishment for the party in this primary remains - a female and a man of color as our front runners - and the broader interest in the primary from day one, when there were a number of contenders, remains.

Democratic registration is up, voter turn out is up, media coverage is up.

Yeah it's been a tough season. But, hey, we're going to come out of it with a well tested, well vetted candidate to counter McCain. And, I hear Ron Paul folks may make some noise in opposition at their convention while Barr makes a late Libertarian appearance.

Bodes well for us, I think.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not By A Long Shot. And Your One Sided Perception Is Astounding.
Moving aside from the fact that you so ignorantly put this on Hillary as if Obama caused no waves whatsoever throughout this process (skewed perception to the max with your tone), the fact is that this primary battle has generated more interest and voter turnout than any other Dem primary in history probably. That's a good thing. A very good thing. We'll be fine in November.

Try and get a grip between now and then, k?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Agreed! And McCain can't even get his name or face in the news
Even FOX spends 95% of their time talking about Hillary and Obama and Democrats ...hardly a peep about McLame...you'd hardly know he was running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. What about Obama and his campaign's assaults on Clinton?
They've assailed and smeared Clinton's character and honesty since the campaign began. Spare the rationalizations and talking points - what about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
51. boo-hoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. What an absolute nonsense.
Maybe it's Obama who had created problems for Hillary.
Sure as hell, if he didn't run, she would walk through this thing and be a nominee already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You bet. All that money would have gone towards her beating McCain
He wouldn't wait his turn.

I've been around too long to put my faith in rookies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The only people who win in our party
Are rookies.

Kerry, Dukakis, and Mondale were not rookies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Carter and Clinton and FDR were governors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. LOL
Carter and FDR had one term. Bill was the Govenor of a small state.

EPIC FAIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. FDR had one term??? LOL! Try 4 -- that's what led to term limits
Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #43
59. He meant that FDR was a 1 term governor.
i.e., he was a rookie.

I'd add Woodrow Wilson to the list of "rookies" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
52. Obama has certainly caused problems for Hillary.
He won the Democratic nomination and ruined her coronation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Our party" is bottom up; you're talking top down, voice of authority.
Dems are an unruly bunch. And we like it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree. Her attitude is if she can't win the nomination, no Democrat will win the White House.
Although she has poisoned the well whenever she gets the chance, I believe Barack has invigorated a new electorate that will leave that kind of olde tyme dog-whistle politics in the dust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
63. don't worry, O-ists will make certain that no dem gets into the white house. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. you got that back-assed backwards
that's what the Clintons are doing. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #63
67. Hillary lost. Get over it. Obama will kick the crap out of McCain; your worst nightmare, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Every day they keep their media-backed hate fest going
is a day of progress lost to the world forever. They are despicable troglodytes and I will be SO happy to see their shitty presidency ranked with Dumya's among the worst ever. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. It will hurt our party more to have a candidate ...
... who can't win. Senator Clinton can, Obama can't.

Look, this is the process. He's not going to get enough delegates to clinch the election (2025). They're going to be within a hundred delegates of each other, or so. She's won all of the big democratic states, and he's gotten his delegate lead by winning caucuses among party insiders, and by winning red states, like those in the deep South, that he can't win in November. They can go to the convention, and let the superdelegates decide who is best to face McCain.

It's not over, and she's proving it tonight in WV, and she'll prove it again in Kentucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. All she's proving is her ability to damage the party.
And she proved that months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
57. How does the Tuzla liar beat an ex-POW? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. you're candidate is responsible for his own campaign
Edited on Tue May-13-08 07:31 PM by bigtree
. . . which has been historically weak against his challenger in this Democratic primary, despite the historic levels of participation overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swishyfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. What do you mean by historically weak?
Just wondering.

He's leading by every possible measure... no?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I've never seen a candidate who is trailing this close to the leader before
. . . this 'late' in the primary. Look at the Gallup poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swishyfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Not THAT close
Unless somebody can pull a gay lover out of their hat, it's over. Hillary is a decent candidate and she has Bill behind her, it's not surprising she's putting up a decent fight, but she can't win at this point.

61% of exit pollees said Bill's support was important.
Must be nice being the former President's wife!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. close enough to deny Obama the opportunity to win the nomination by actual votes cast alone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
54. Historicaly weak.....
What does that say about Hillary ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swishyfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Dupe
Edited on Tue May-13-08 07:35 PM by swishyfeet
argh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. Clinton's constant hammering on Michigan and Florida is really the big divisive
action. If they would have accepted the rules, people would not be as divided. Yes, MI and FL voters would be pissed if they were totally ignored in the end but that hasn't happened yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Youi're only hearing one note -- I hear her hammering on issues I care about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
58. Like "obliterating" Iran? Scolding Iraqis for not appreciating
--the wonderful gift of "freedom" we gave them? Like docking my paycheck to support health insurance? Like shilling for the Columbia "free" trade bill (yes, Mark Penn and Bill really do count here).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. And BHO showed he did not care about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. Yeah, what's after 'hope' and 'change'? 1969?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heathen57 Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #28
70. Barack is playing by the rules
Something Clinton and her campaign know nothing of. There were several tries to get the delegates to be allowed in, but they didn't work out. And it wasn't Obama that was always stopping it.

At the end of the month a decision will be made and I'll bet the delegates will be seated from those two states. They just won't have any clout in deciding who the nominee is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. Too Basd for Her...

She must be setting herself up for a 2012 run.

Doesn't make any difference - if she does - she could get beat by a blind beagle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. It's all about hope and positivity the bob barr 3rd party will take votes from McCain so cheer up
there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's all about hope and positivity the bob barr 3rd party will take votes from McCain so cheer up
Edited on Tue May-13-08 08:25 PM by barack the house
really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
35. Be positive. She is destroying her political career. Watch NY next re-election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. Utter bullshit. It is a hard fought campaign. So sick of you people expecting her to just
let Obama win. If you truly believe that Obama's campaign didn't start crap in this primary you are naive. Of course they have. He isn't the all innocent he makes himself out to be. That is a carefully created persona. He didn't even have to do much to promote it. His supporters have elevated him to this godlike status. Should he get lucky enough to actually win the GE you will be bitterly disappointed in what he turns out to be. He has campaigned in the same manner as the other candidates by mailing misleading fliers, airing misleading ads, making phone calls, starting innuendos about race, diminishing other democrats and their contributions. He has used his wife and many celebrities to cut down his opponents. His supporters have gone and disrupted Hillary's campaign at every stop. He is a politician, and behaves like one like it or not. Listening to you Obama's campaign has done what it set out to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heathen57 Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
69. Would you kindly provide a listing
of all the "crap" that Obama himself started against Clinton personally? Also any of the "crap" that was said by one of his staff where he didn't dismiss the remark within a day?

I'm sure that I can come up with a list of things Clinton has done as well as the things her staff has done that there has been no apology for until much later, if at all. If I don't do it, some kind soul here will.

You, just like your candidate, has made the accusations. Isn't it about time you all back up your libel with facts? Or is that something that Clinton and her supporters don't have to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. Oh libel my ass. How histrionic of you. Thanks for proving my point. Once again an Obama
supporter comes out and declares all things bad about Clinton are true, and little Obama is the saint who will save everyone. He hasn't done any dirty campaigning huh? Give me a break. He flip flops, he distorts, he hides things, and he will sell his soul for your vote. He is a typical politician. Get the stars out of your eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heathen57 Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. And as is typical with a Clinton supporter,
you still haven't answered the question I asked. Can you give specific instances where Obama himself has done the things you say, or is all you have are vague charges that have no substance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dano81818 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
37. and this is all that really matters
thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. replace 'clinton' with 'obama' and you'd have gotten it right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Why, because he had the gall to win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. Obama doesn't wear well; exciting at first, but they you get sick of it playing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Rather Like Your Post
After the (exciting) first word you get sick of reading it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Nyah-Nyah
If Obama is exciting to you, you're not experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. I agree...........
No comment, or it would be nasty like Hillary and her fools!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. what a bunch of bullshit. I thought that idiotic meme; "its all Clinton's fault"
was going to end with Bush blaming all of his mistakes on Clinton. I see that it will not end as you all have decided to take up the unfounded, idiotic right-wing cause.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. It's becomming more and more freeperish around here lately - hasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. No - Obama has hurt the party by ignoring middle class voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swishyfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. You say it's becoming freeperish around here then post this bullshit?
Fucking brilliant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
49. She is trying to make him weak so he loses and she runs in 2012. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. She will have no chance in 2012
Too many burned bridges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
53. get real
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
61. uh, it's our party too, and the non-stop nastiness from O-ists is hurting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #61
72. Amen to that!
That some Obama folks are already blaming Hillary for an Obama loss in November is shameful. IF he is the nominee, and IF he loses, he will have himself to blame--just like any adult would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
65. Clinton stayed in and it helped our party.
If she really wanted to stab Obama in the back, she could have dropped out before WV and KY voted. Then he would have lost horribly to a candidate that was no longer in the race. We have new voters and tons of money going to the Democratic Party because of Clinton AND Obama. He will not win this without her. I just don't see him getting the electoral votes in the GE. They know what they are doing and they don't really care what we think about it. They just want to win in November and the candidates will come together in a few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
74. Both Obama and Edwards have said she hasn't.
And yes, I know -- Obama supporters will say they're "just being gracious."

I don't think so. I think they're trying to get through to people who might otherwise drive Hillary's supporters away that the Hillary-bashing is NOT helping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC