Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, why really, is Clinton still campaigning?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:54 PM
Original message
So, why really, is Clinton still campaigning?
I could certainly understand if she decided to suspend her campaign and hold onto her delegates. But, at this point, she must know that her chances won't be affected by her campaign. Win or lose the next states, it won't matter. Her only chance of becoming the nominee is if Obama is caught in flagrante with Chelsea (or Bill) , and Hillary gets a massive sympathy vote from superdelegates. So, why is she campaigning? My guess is she wans to finish on a high note, and will suspend her campaign after West Virginia. Otherwise, it's awfully hard to figure out her motive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. she can campaign all she wants to in WV
as long as she spends some of that money she just gave to her campaign there


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyToad Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
40. Because it would look REALLY bad if Obama lost states to someone who is no longer running
Which is what would happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. True.
It didn't look good for McCain when he won slim majorities in states where he had no real competition.

But that assumes Hillary is staying in for the benefit of helping Obama, which I doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'The Huckabee Effect'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
67. That's exactly what I was thinking - what else does she have to do.
Perhaps she and Huckabee should team up and take their show on the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. She doesn't want to finish on a high note. She's telling lower-class whites that they
aren't expected to vote for Obama when there's a white person in the race--either her or John McCain. She wants them to vote for McCain in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. If were in KY or WV I would not like how she is portraying the voters there.
I would be angry that she would use that tactic. She appears to be painting with broad brush, a very undeserved portrait of many voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Sadly, the polls show that her comments are being borne out. She's just
reinforcing the trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary 2012 - that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. History has not looked kindly on democrats with failed presidential bids
We tend to discard them as damaged goods. If we go by history, she has no 2012 bid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorekerrydreamticket Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
72. I can't imagine the money coming in for her in 2012 after she mismanaged this
campaign so badly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. That's probably more true than most of us realize...
The problem for her is that every one of us will remember what she is doing today four years from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Oh, yeah, I won't forget, or forgive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. At this point her only intent is to create an unreconcilable division
...between her supporters and Obama so he loses in the GE.

Theres no other rational explanation.

And no, Clinton supporters, if she suspended her campaign today the upcoming primaries would still take place with her on the ballot, so she would still be allowing "the voters to be heard".

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because if she can't have the Dem presidency, then no one can. It's spite, imho.
It's the same kind of thing that drives boyfriends to kill their girlfriends when the woman wants to get out of the relationship.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm very afraid that you may be right. That is such a godawful thought , though that I don't want to
go there. To put her own selfish ambition above stopping the slaughtering of our troops and Iraqi and Afghani civilians. To risk the overturn of Roe v. Wade, etc., etc. just so she can run in '12. Some pundit needs to call her on this shit right now.

:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Yes, it's a "godawful thought", and I'd rather be able to think of a different reason.
But all I see is single-minded ambition.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. Yet we have seen no evidence to the contrary...
We should believe what our eyes and ears are seeing and hearing. Not to mention what our noses are smelling...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
47. I don't think it is about 2012 anymore
She has burned far too many bridges. It really seems personal right now. She wants to do as much damage to Obama as she can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Or, in my Aunt Sally's case what drove her to kill her second husband....
She was cooking his eggs one morning and he told her he was leaving her. Aunt Sally snapped and killed him with a skillet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Except in your Aunt Sally's case, I can't help but sympathize with her just a little bit.
I have no such sympathy for those who would rule over me.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. That's a bullshit opinion
that only Republicans or otherwise severely delusional people will espouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Opinions are just opinions, everybody has 'em. Facts are "bullshit" or not -- opinions are just
opinions.

In my opinion, Clinton supporters are delusional.

Therefore, I obviously disagree with your opinion, but I would never call your opinion "bullshit" -- because it IS, after all, your real opinion, not a fake opinion.

;)
sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Republicans said the same about her in 2004,
when both her and Bill Clinton (right after heart surgery, I might add) campaigned extensively for Kerry. It wasn't any truer then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. You know, I've about run out of patience with people who don't seem to have any political memory
Edited on Sat May-10-08 01:41 PM by scarletwoman
longer than 4 or 8 years ago.

I'm an old lady who was 14 years old when JFK was assassinated. I've been paying attention ever since.

Bill Clinton did a few small cool things, but he enabled a whole lot of bigger bad things. One of the bigger bad things we got out of the Clinton presidency was the cancer of the DLC infecting the Democratic party.

It was the DLC that pushed that odious toad Joe Lieberman on Al Gore in 2000. I've been on this board for 7 years saying that the Democratic party has to get RID of the DLC.

I would NEVER vote for a Clinton again, period.

sw



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. And this has exactly what to do with the unsubstantiated opinion
that Hillary does not want a Democratic win this year, and didn't want it in 2004? Also, what would you know about how far back my "political memory" goes?

I'll take even a DLC Democrat over a Republican, but you will obviously be enabling McCain if Hillary gets the nomination. Great way of paying attention, lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Okay, I will "substantiate" my opinion: I hereby do affirm and attest that that which I have
previously referred to as being my opinion, is indeed, my opinion.

Sworn on this 10th day of May, 2008.
sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Getting a little cranky there I believe.
You'll note that I didn't call you old.

Also, if DLC hate is your thing, then Obama is out too. It's off to vote Green for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #39
54. Obama is not DLC
Edited on Sun May-11-08 07:40 AM by Zodiak Ironfist
He repudiated them and had them remove his name from their website when they tried to claim credit for him.

http://www.blackcommentator.com/48/48_cover.html

Another DLC hater here who does his homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Thanks for answering that post -- since I was liable to just say something cranky.
:D

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #54
62. I didn't say he "is" DLC. But he has DLC ties.
Deal with it.

And the DLC will strongly support him if he is nominated. An anti-DLC candidate he is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. Schumer has DLC ties
Because he gives speeches at their events and takes money from DLC to go on trips.

Can you show similar ties to the DLC with Obama, or is the endorsement of just a few DLC senators enough to call "ties"?

I didn't say he was the "anti-DLC" candidate. I said he is not DLC, as in takes no money from them, does not endorse their positions, doesn't give speeches for them, doesn't involve himself in their policy decisions, and doesn't marginalize progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #64
70. Ahem
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/01/fords_next_move.html

Even Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) has expressed interest in "find ways he could work with the DLC," according to Ford. (Ford describes Obama as a "personal friend" and says they talk regularly.)


And you know exactly why the DLC would endorse Obama, right? He fits the DLC mold perfectly, he's just the kind of Unity & Bipartisanship candidate they've been clamoring for. Supporting Obama equals supporting the DLC. And since it's the same with Hillary, I guess we can take this little point off the list of reasons as to why one candidate would be better than the other. Hillary or Obama - same thing as far as the DLC is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. He also wants to work with Republicans and progressives
I'm sorry, but that quote from Ford does not prove ties to the DLC.

And the DLC did not endorse Obama...that would be illegal. You do know that the DLC cannot endorse any candidate, right?

But if metrics are what you want, Clinton is endorsed by 10 DLC senators (including herself). Obama....five.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #54
66. Nice logo!
I bet Geddy Lee would be proud. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
56. everyone knows that whoever wins the nom wins the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because she still has a shot at winning
And as the fighter she is, she's not giving up prematurely. Especially not when Obama is on the verge of getting absolutely creamed in WV and KY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. She has a shot at winning like I have a shot at going back to
VietNam.

Bullshit. She's TOAST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yeah I hear those charters ain't so expensive now.
Have a nice trip! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm talking about in the Army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
60. No she doesn't. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's not campaigning, it's fundraising. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
61. That's my guess.
She's raising money to pay down the debt from her campaign.

Does anybody have a sense of what kind of money she's spending to campaign post-NC and Indiana? If it's not a lot, then it validates this theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. She wants to be President of West Virginia?
That's all I can come up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. Don't know, don't care. Just beat her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. The reason why Clinton is
bashing Obama, even though she can't win is to keep us divided. It has nothing to do with her winning. She will go to the convention with division as her goal. If she keeps the party divided she can go all the way up as close to the November election with the hope the party doesn't have the time to unite and take McSame. It's not about her winning, it's about taking out Obama, so she can come back in 2012.

We all saw the SDs that went to Clinton very early on. Most of the SDs that didn't go for Clinton early on did so because they really don't prefer her or they would have most likely done the same thing and went with her early on. So the ones left are mostly going to go with Obama for that reason. And that is what we are seeing. Very little have gone to Clinton, and that won't change. She knows the math and knows the SDs, won't do it. That leaves taking out Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. "...so she can come back in 2012."
There will be no place for her to come back to. The Clinton legacy and the Democratic party will be forever at odds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Pay off her debt. Donate today @ Hillary.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. To damage Obama so that she can run in 2012. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. At this point, that would be the only reason for her to continue campaigning. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. Someone left the kook out in the rain.
She's running a right-wing campaign organized and funded by the right wing and they haven't bothered to pull the plug yet. Why should they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. Because:
Because

Someone's got to keep up the attacks on Obama after John McCain knocks off at 4:30pm for the Seniors dinner specials at Sizzler?

The campaign provides a good cover to explain why Bill spends so much time in Hotel bars?

She literally can't pronounce the words 'President Obama'"?

Every time she tries to leave she gets pinned down by sniper fire?

Because Rush told her to stay in 'til the end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. I hope you are right. I'd love to see her go out on a high note. I'm a supporter of hers
but even I can see she is near the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. One reason Huckabee stayed in
was to collect a database of supporters in as many states as possible for a future run.

I'm sure Hillary's campaign is compiling a long list of donors, volunteers and everyone who responded favorably to phone bank calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
41. Leverage to force herself onto the ticket
Makes you wonder what she forgot in the White House that's so important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. I fear this too. She is a very
manipulative person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. The good news is Pelosi, Kennedy and other heavy hitters nixed that idea
and she burned any bridge she had to it long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jordi_fanclub Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
43. The more direct and shortest answer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
45. maybe because she's not a quitter, and some people respect that. sorry if that disrupts saint obama'
obama's coronation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
46. One word, as I see it... EGO. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
48. She looks really awful on CNN this morning.I know that's irrelevant.
But this endless campaign is now really starting to show in her face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
50. If she can get off the topic of skin color she can finish up on a high note
by attacking McCain - by pointing out in clear terms to her supporters what McCain stands for (and set the table for her transition to supporting Obama and getting her supporters to transition to Obama). She can help register Democrats through the end of the primary cycle - the extended nature of this primary season has been uncomfortable for many, but it has produced a ton of registered Democrats that a short primary season may not have.

She needs to go ultra-negative on McCain. Keating 5, unstable temper, 4 more years of Bush, doesn't understand the economy, 100 years in Iraq - and do it all day every day.

Hillary can do more to get Obama elected by staying in the race than by dropping out, she can also do more to hurt him by staying in the race than by dropping out. The question is - what the heck will she do and how will she go about doing it. Much of her future as a leader of the Democratic party will be determined in the next few weeks. Here's hoping she chooses to support the future of the party (though I will be honest and say I have some serious doubts that she will).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
51. because she is an attention whorenetode.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
52. 2012
As if she'll win it then. Democrats have long memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
53. because she has nothing else to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
55. Because she wants Obama to lose the GE
Edited on Sun May-11-08 07:48 AM by workinclasszero
to clear the way for her 2012 run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
57. to kill time
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
59. She's going for the big wins in WV and KY
in order to jump start fund raising efforts so she can retire her debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems to Win Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
63. She wants to force herself onto the ticket as VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
65. Why did the 1976 Buccaneers continue to play?
They should have quit. I mean it was Obvious they could not win. And the 1990 patriots should just have stopped and never played another game. Well that is not how Americans do things. See some of us against all odds and all the punditry still believe and hope. These are not just words that we vomit up and think it sounds nice. They really do mean something to some of us. And when it becomes a reality to me, your candidate will gain a supporter with the same beliefs he had for his losing candidate. But if you guys want to throw us away go ahead. It's your loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
68. Because she's a patriot who loves her country...
..and she wants absolutely nothing more than to selflessly give of herself to make this country and this world a better place. She cares about the democratic party and wants to save it from imploding and then.......hahahahahahahahaha.....just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
69. To piss you off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC