Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloomberg: Best for economy: HRC: 32%, BO 26%, JM 23%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:26 AM
Original message
Bloomberg: Best for economy: HRC: 32%, BO 26%, JM 23%
Part of the new Bloomberg/LaTimes poll being discussed on MSNBC now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wall Street's chosen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think it's hilarious that both of the Democrats are ranked higher than McBush n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. So why are they giving their money to Obama?
Actually, I'm beginning to think its the health insurance industry who is using Obama to push Clinton out of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. Yeah, can't be the voters
in the 30+ contests that Obama has won. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. Yeah, because the Health Insurance industry...
Edited on Sat May-10-08 04:19 PM by skypuddle
Is absolutely TERRIFIED of Hillary's plan to mandate that every American purchase health insurance from a private insurer.

:eyes:

Oh, you wacky Hillarites!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. They're afraid of her public plan competing w/ private insurance
they're also afraid of the premium caps and other restrictions insurance companies will have to agree to.

That's why Obama left it out of his proposal. Little things mean a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. So what do you make of the polls showing that Obama would beat Hillary in CA
if the primaries were held today? If hypothetical what ifs are legitimate arguments to present to the SDs; is it ok for Obama to add that to his list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting how your betray your biases with your choice of initials
You lose ALL credibility, as a reasoned poster, when you refer to Hillary as "HRC" and Obama as "BO".

You childish body odor reference is not lost on the average DUer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Don't be silly.
People complain about referring to his middle name. It's a no-win situation.

You're nuts if you think that was an intentional slight on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. Hey, look at this guy! He's saying we SHOULD call Obama "Hussein"!
Alright, if you said so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. INDEPENDENTS: HRC 35.... McCain 46
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Where do those numbers come from?
What do they refer to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. you are trouble
Where do those numbers come from?
THE POLL YOU JUST POSTED.

What do they refer to?
SUPPORT OF INDEPENDENTS BETWEEN HRC AND MCCAIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. How am I in trouble?
Those numbers weren't shown on MSNBC, and you didn't provide any information. It was a pretty logical question. I'm still wondering where you got them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Read the POLL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. You're being ridiculous
I said in the OP that the numbers I posted were aired on television. Those are the numbers I quoted.

You posted other numbers, with no link, no reference. Why not just link the online poll if you have it handy?

But anyway, the point is, she's beating McCain by more than Obama is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. google, its not new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. LOL
awfully prickly, aren't you? A rational person, quoting numbers, provides the source of them and doesn't get all jerky when asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. "the point is, she's beating McCain by more than Obama is" so?
she is not the nominee and this is a poll not an election in November

Are we supposed to believe that people who are polled are wise?

Or that POTUS waves a magic wand on Day One to banish those pesky coequal branches of government so that POTUS can be dictator and git er done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Obama's not the nominee either
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. so you actually think the SDs are going to give it to Hillary? They are not uneducated
they know that the Democratic party without African American support is a party that would not control congress. That many downticket house races lose without African American support. Since POTUS is but one coequal branch how does that benefit the Democratic party. If you want the party that defers to the white vote you should join the GOP.

Add HRC unfavorables including her high perception of dishonesty and you are looking at ain't going to happen. I don't have ESP but I can see the big picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I think there's a chance
that if Clinton demonstrates she's the better candidate, they will.

Having the most pledged delegates is not the one and only measure, no matter how much you guys wish it were.

And no, I shouldn't join the GOP. I'm a lifelong Democrat. The exclusionary bullshit you guys keep pulling isn't going to help you much in the GE. It seems most of you are brand new to politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Why don't you find a "magic number generator" and buy some lotto tickets with them instead...
Edited on Sat May-10-08 01:45 PM by calipendence
You probably have better odds of winning that and the results probably would be more satisfying too!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. Why is it inappropriate
to discuss polling here in GDP? I don't think I'm the first person to post new polling information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. delete
Edited on Sat May-10-08 12:21 PM by hnmnf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. I suspect most people don't really trust any of them on the economy.
And will just hope for the best from any of them. I don't think I know anyone who has faith in the government for anything economy related anymore, if they ever did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
53. The economy is actually not so difficult this time
(Note--I'm going to alternate the order of use of Hillary and Barack throughout. I marginally (and only marginally) prefer Hillary over Barack--my guy was Edwards. If you want to see me cheerlead, let's start a discussion of the relative merits of either two weaksauce dregs we have left to him.)

1) Withdraw from Iraq--we can't afford to keep financing the occupation. Both Hillary and Barack are for a quick withdrawal.

2) Balance the budget. With Iraq out of the picture, much easier.

3) Support investment in alternative energy and infrastructure (including public transit that allows urban/suburban survival and subsidies to protect the breadbasket). Both Barack and Hillary *seem* likely to be willing to do this.

4) Support the State Department and diplomacy over the Big Stick. Again, both Hillary and Barack seem likely to follow this track. Hillary's statement on retaliating against Iran AND Barack's statement on pre-emptive invasion of Pakistan are both saying they would retain the importance of Israel's security and anti-terrorism as cornerstones of their foreign policies. That's not news. (If Iran decided to bomb Israel Barack would be protecting Israel also. If Pakistan were shown to be protecting Osama bin Laden--you know, the actual terrorist, not the Bush Administration's boogeyman--Hillary would move in.)

5) Maintain the social safety net. Neither Barack nor Hillary is going to propose dismantling it (although both would likely bow to political pressure if a Republican Congress were to come to power and force it on them.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Consider the source.
:boring:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Turn off your tee-vee ... stop supporting the talking head elitists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I'll give your advice
all the consideration it deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. She is a smart lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. How do you explain the gas tax holiday then?
:rofl:

You're still my favorite Hillary supporter ccharles000. You praise Hillary without unfairly attacking Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. I gotta chuckle at McCain's last-place finish in this one!
Especially given the news source.

I hadn't seen this, MonkeyFunk -- thanks for posting it.

How good it would be to see a healthy economy framed on the global idea of dignity-in-life for people instead of which candidate would "be good for the economy."

In 1968, Robert F. Kennedy said,

“The gross national product is rising above $800 billion a year but that figure does not measure the health of our youth, the quality of their education or the joy of their play. It does not measure the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.”


Adjusting the figures to our current global economy, RFK's point still stands, I think. The reporters and analysts who worked that piece for Bloomberg/LA Times should maybe put down their calendars and go outside and sit next to a stand of spring tulips.

Using Robert Kennedy's criteria, IMO McCain STILL finishes last!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. Sexism? How come Hillary gets the 'R' in HRC
Her middle initial is more special than everybody else's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. BRO vs. HRC: how is it sexism when a woman holds onto her maiden name?
Perhaps BO should add his wife's maiden name to his! Then he would be BRO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. BRO!
Hehe, I like it! :rofl:

Also, my other post was sarcastic, since it was responding to a poster who cries 'sexism' about 10 times a day on this site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I do?
:shrug:

News to me!

When people were calling her bitch and cunt, yeah, I spoke up. But my call out of sexism is about 1% of the average Obama supporter's call out of racism. And when I do it, there's evidence of real sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
50. Did somebody's candidate lose?
:cry: :cry: :cry:

hehe :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Because if I refer to his middle name
you guys have a cow. If I don't refer to it, you have a cow.

Clinton is commonly called "Hillary Rodham-Clinton". Obama is commonly called "Barack Obama".

Anybody who objects to this is just being a prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. You seriously think, now and in the future, we should choose our candidate by polling?
Edited on Sat May-10-08 09:35 AM by Bonobo
If that is your argument, come right out and say it.

It seems that is what you are advocating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. You're bad at reading minds
I posted some numbers. You invented the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. I'm dumb. Please explain your argument behind the numbers (if there is one) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I didn't make an argument
I posted the numbers for discussion. It's what we do here, discuss politics. Voters think Clinton would be better on the economy than McCain or Obama. What do you think about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. I think it is impossible to say since it is really a function of listening to economic advisors and
so far it looks like Hillary doesn't like to take the advice of Economists before making a decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. ha ha Sour grapes is your 'argument" ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
37. Meaningless. Media reinforces Clinton brand; voters unaware of economists favoring Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
42. And yet-----

Pres '08 (D)

May 10 GallupObama 49%, Clinton 44% Pres '08 (D)
May 10 RasmussenObama 48%, Clinton 43% Pres '08 (D)
May 9 Hotline/DiageoObama 48%, Clinton 37% Pres '08 (D)
May 9 GallupObama 48%, Clinton 46% Pres '08 (D)
May 9 RasmussenObama 50%, Clinton 42% Pres '08 (D)
May 8 GallupObama 47%, Clinton 46% Pres '08 (D)
May 8 RasmussenObama 47%, Clinton 43% Pres '08 (D)
May 7 GallupObama 47%, Clinton 46% Pres '08 (D)
May 7 RasmussenObama 47%, Clinton 43% Pres '08 (D)
May 6 GallupObama 48%, Clinton 46%



http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/polltracker/pres_08_d/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. The same Bloomberg poll
shows Clinton beating McCain by 3 more points than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
43. Sweet! Democrats = 58%, McCain 23%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
44. I'm sure this is based on extensive research into their positions
and not remembering the days of the Clinton white house with rose colored glasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. If Clinton is only getting 32% as being best for the economy I think she
is in big trouble. Considering the prosperity that take place in the 90's I would expect her to grab closer to 50%. This should have been her strongest attribute by far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. lol
yet she polls better than Obama and McCain. You guys are funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC