Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It is INFANTILE to throw stones at the likes of Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Bill Richardson

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:55 PM
Original message
It is INFANTILE to throw stones at the likes of Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Bill Richardson
Edited on Fri May-09-08 08:57 PM by Bicoastal
simply because they didn't choose your candidate. The irony is that Bill Richardson was almost universally respected here until he dared to pick a horse--then, in some circles, they started calling him a drag on the party. On another post today, someone dared to ask "what has he done for us lately?"

What the F*** have YOU done for us lately, oh Internet warrior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh snap!!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. The old guard, business as usual politicians that are attempting a rebirth of their political.......
Edited on Fri May-09-08 09:06 PM by Double T
careers by supporting and promoting BO, are a drag on the Democratic Party. If this is BO's idea of 'hope' and 'change' there will certainly be NONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Ya, like all these new young Democratic & people-of-color voters are SUCH a drag
on the Party of "politics as ususal" Democrats so-called. Too fucking bad.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
50. So what is YOUR point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
47. really? Ted Kennedy's political career is in danger? bzzzt.
wrongo. His career is just fine and he's one of the most powerful dems in D.C. Pat Leahy? LOL! He has 70% approval ratiing in VT, and he's also one of the most powerful people in D.C. Kerry's career is secure. So is Richardson's. Your post doesn't even make any sense. Furthermore, these aren't business as usual politicians no matter how long they've been in Washington. They are the democratic wing of the dem party, and its leading liberal lions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Ted didn't get obama elected in his own state of Massachusetts;..........
it was Clinton that won. Kerry didn't win the WH. Richardson didn't win the nomination; not even close. Pat Leahy may be a powerful Dem in Washington, but what the hell has he accomplished or done for the American people in recent years. If it is ALL ABOUT 'hope' and specially 'CHANGE' these guys are NOT part of the equation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. And John Edwards is not fair game either.... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. same applies to Bill & Hillary Clinton
and those good Dems who support her candidacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hillary's running for president. See, I actually don't mind half as much if you criticize Obama...
...but you won't find me criticizing Plame, Murtha, Fienstein (my Senator) and other Dems who are merely endorsing them.

Same goes for Obama's Dems. This smear-by-proxy stuff is complete BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. delete n/t
Edited on Fri May-09-08 09:21 PM by ProSense


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I am entitled to my opinion of that 2 faced jerk. He is trying to
SHIT all over my party and I am allowed to be pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. So right, you're entitled to be vile. She lost, get over it. Kennedy has a point
look at the tone of her campaign and her supporters. It's disgusting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. But you think HIS tone is ok??? After the life he has lived and the number
of passes HE has been given, it is APPALLING to me that he would try and talk shit about people he has been FRIENDS with for years.
Agree or disagree with them, I get it. But he is going OUT OF HIS WAY to slap her down and I find it offensive.
He can take his drunk driving ass back to the compound now and rot for all I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. "He can take his drunk driving ass back to the compound now and rot for all I care."
Kennedy is right n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. He has much in his life to answer for. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
He is doing more damage to this party with his continued ridiculous statements than her staying in is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Delusional and bitter. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. lol. Whatever.
If he had said that about Saint Obama, this place would be on fire.

Hypocrites abound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. But he had no reason to, did he? To quote Hillary: If you can't stand the heat...
Deal with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. This gave me a chuckle. The Obama crew has done more bashing
and shit talking than 15 of the top LA Gangs put together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. Look in a fucking mirror before you pass judegement on others, oh lord of the high horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
34. What's disgusting is Kennedy's past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. Just a little trivia fact: Kennedy was never sued for sexual harassment...
and Kennedy's wife never had to spend her OWN money to pay off the woman, AND at the same time knowing that her husband had started yet another affair during the sexual harassment investigation.

Kennedy's past is not clean, but he's not running for the presidency, either. The Clintons' past is not clean, and they are.

It's cool if Hillary supporters need to pitch a fit or two. They've had a lot of disappointments lately and surely are entitled to vent a little. I respect your right to do that, but to bring up Kennedy's past when Bill and Hillary's past is equally, if not more, problematic than Kennedy, deserves different insight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. He's guilty of much more than sexual misconduct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. Fine. How about Pat Leahy?
Never so much as a whiff of personal scandal. 34 years as a Senator without making hay off of it and becoming rich, (he the's 96th wealthiest Senator)a staunch liberal. No ambitions beyond being Senator. Senator for as long as he wishes. What's he guilty of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. You'd like to cause physical harm to Ted Kennedy...well...
...I think you may want to edit this post before a Mod deletes it and no one knows what we're conversing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not physical harm. More like a knock in to reality.
He's been acting a damn fool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. She'd better be careful or Ted might have to give her a ride home from a party in self-defense
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. I'd be more worried about Bill asking her to "kiss it." I doubt Kennedy...
does much of his own driving anymore, but I don't think Bill is at the stage yet where he has someone else ask a woman he doesn't know to kiss Bill's penis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. What did he say? I thought I kept up on this stuff, but I didn't hear this one. Anybody?????
Edited on Fri May-09-08 09:18 PM by seriousstan
In case the OP gets wiped because of a physical threat.....What did Kennedy say that riled people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I wasn't actually saying I'd hurt him. Gawd, people are sooooo
hysterical.


Chill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Fine, I don't care what you said, I was asking what Kennedy said that made you mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Here is what he said
Edited on Fri May-09-08 09:28 PM by LibraLiz1973
HUNT: What's your view of an Obama-Clinton ticket?

KENNEDY: I don't think it's possible.

HUNT: You don't? And what type of vice president choice do you think he should make? What type of person?

KENNEDY: Well, the first is always a demand that you're going to have someone that's going to be able to assume the responsibility. I would hope that he would also give consideration to somebody that has –- is in tune with his appeal for the nobler aspirations of the American people. And I think if we had real leadership –- as we do with Barack Obama –- in the number-two spot as well, it'd be enormously helpful.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

If people want to throw down about the Clintons doing damage to our party, you tell me HOW the drivel he is spilling isn't as ...or worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Thinking that HRC could be VP is like thinking McCain could have been Bush's VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It isn't for Ted Kennedy to try and put a moral compass near HRC's head
He is the LAST person who should be trying to throw down about morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. You are entitled to your vile opinion, but Kennedy can't speak his mind?
Edited on Fri May-09-08 09:47 PM by ProSense
You're a bitter and hypocritical. Hillary lost, it's not Kennedy's fault. She ran a stupid and divisive campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I'm not a Hillary supporter.
It's not Kennedy's fault she lost. I agree.
But his words and actions this campaign season have been low class and obnoxious.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. No, he spoke the truth, and who said anything about you being a Hillary supporter? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. My potted fern would make a better VP than Hillary Clinton. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. What's wrong with what he said?
He didn't dispairage Clinton. She deserves it, for her blatant race baiting, but he was fairly genteel in his criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
39. It's true isn't it?
You can't have a VP who doesn't believe you've crossed the threshold. She is the one who ruled herself out by claiming he's not at least as qualified as her and McCain. No matter how it gets twisted, she's done this to herself with her remarks. She clearly is NOT in tune with Obama, we will at least need someone who can give him a little bit of credit rather than cast him as worse than the Republican at every opportunity. Plus, she also states he's elitist as are Gore and Kerry, so let's go with someone who won't use Republican labels against our nominee. :)


---

"I have crossed the Commander in Chief threshold. Senator McCain has crossed the Commander in Chief threshold. Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002."

----

“I think that since we now know Sen. (John) McCain will be the nominee for the Republican Party, national security will be front and center in this election. We all know that. And I think it’s imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander-in-chief threshold,” the New York senator told reporters crowded into an infant’s bedroom-sized hotel conference room in Washington.

“I believe that I’ve done that. Certainly, Sen. McCain has done that and you’ll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy,” she said.

Calling McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee a good friend and a “distinguished man with a great history of service to our country,” Clinton said, “Both of us will be on that stage having crossed that threshold. That is a critical criterion for the next Democratic nominee to deal with.”

---
Her reaction after Obama gives credit to McCain for his military service and says he's a step up better than Bush...

As people in the crowd shouted, “No!” Mrs. Clinton added, “We need a nominee who will take on John McCain, not cheer on John McCain, and I will be that nominee.”

See, we need a nominee to fight John McCain, according to her, so she has ruled herself out. Let's take her advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. DAMN RIGHT!!! They have gone off the deep end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. Ted Kennedy, John Kerry - yes. Bill Richardson - no.
Edited on Fri May-09-08 09:48 PM by kerry-is-my-prez
I have a very strong sense of loyalty and I think he is a major creep. Used to like the guy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. Loyalty to who? Bill's not running and he owed Hillary NOTHING....


Richardson's loyalty is PROPERLY to his country first, his party second, and Bill Clinton third.


Richardson chose to go with the first two over the third.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bill Richardson made it much less likely that he would be the VP to Obama.
If he would have stayed loyal to Hillary he would have been seen as a "compromise" candidate. Now he would be seen as a "slap in the face" to Hillary and her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
38. Bicoastal
I know who you are talking about and I won't say who that individual was. From what I've heard they've been given a fair shot at reforming their behavior and I've pointed out what they said earlier because it was pretty nasty. All you can do with people like that is put them on ignore. When this is over, they'll either have to live with Obama winning the primary or leave. It's as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
40. Yes, it is.
As infantile as it is to ostracize Maya Angelou, Robert Kennedy, Joe Wilson, and every other former "DU hero" who decided not to back Obama.

(And to think these people, and others, were untouchable saints on DU at one time.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mushroom Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
41. Those rich doods are protected
Domestic homicides more than doubled in Massachusetts, though.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
42. Richardson was promised something...the joke is that Bill Clinton kept trying to
find him a job he could do.

Obama sucked up to Teddy as soon as he was catapulted into the Senate (his opposition self-destructed). Teddy resembles the grandfather who raised him (a typical white person). Teddy wouldn't want there to be 2 Clinton presidents to his family's 1.

The Clintons came out of Arkansas and made it on their own merit, not inherited rum money from Boston.

Kerry is Kennedy light, but he did ask McCain to be his veep in 2004, which says something about McCain's acceptability to the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
51. Hell, Carter was a called a loser for hinting he may endorse Obama.
After that nothing surprises me anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC