Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: Penn thought primaries were winner-take-all?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 08:55 AM
Original message
TPM: Penn thought primaries were winner-take-all?
:freak:

With the Clinton campaign widely viewed as being on its last legs, staffers are now more free than ever to dish out some dirt on the many strategic blunders of Mark Penn.

The latest: At a strategy session last year, Penn reportedly said that a Clinton win in California would effectively wrap up the nomination by awarding her all of the state's 370 delegates.

As we all know, Democrats don't do winner-take-all primaries, but instead use a form of proportional representation that has been in force for about 20 years -- a fact that didn't seem to sink in with the Clinton campaign and their big-state strategy.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/05/report_mark_penn_thought_dem_p.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. dope
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mark Penn Clinton's 10 million dollar idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. get a refund, hillary. this fat ass ain't worth a dime. and, if Obama
assumes your debt, it better not go to this asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Pitiful
WTH - This asshole is running your campaign and didn't understand the rules...bwahaha....that is funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. And he was paid (or is owed) big bucks for all that wisdom!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. no, let's emphasize that Penn (someone that inept) has been a Clinton crony for YEARS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. no, let's emphasize that Penn (someone that inept) has been a Clinton crony for YEARS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. HAHAHHAAH!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. She deserves what has happened because these are the type of
things that good leaders recognize and remove people like this. It is indicative of how poorly an operation she has run. Obama has top rate people on his staff from Susan Rice to Powers (I don't care what she said) all they way down to their tech staff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can Hillary get a refund from this schmuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. A big part of her campaign debt is biills from this asshole
Obama. Don't you dare give any of my money to those idiots. I donated money to YOUR campaign, and will give more. But not a penny to these morans. I'm series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Texas two step
I remember reading reports about how the Clinton campaign didn't understand how the primary system worked in that state. The campaign which claimed that their candidate would be ready on day one was itself weeks late and millions short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. LAST YEAR he said this? And he stayed on the payroll after saying it?
If this is true, then the incompetence of Hillary's campaign is easily explained:

The candidate has no clue about how to manage anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. What an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. And her team is still whining that if we played by GOP rules, she would
have won by now.

Penn is an overpaid POS. She should have fired his ass a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Remember Texas?
They did interviews talking about how they don't understand the process there.

Great consultants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. That's what happens when you hire Republicans
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. Here's the source of that from Time. Even Ickes was horrified at Penn's stupidity.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1738331,00.html

"The Five Mistakes Clinton Made"

As aides looked over the campaign calendar, chief strategist Mark Penn confidently predicted that an early win in California would put her over the top because she would pick up all the state's 370 delegates. It sounded smart, but as every high school civics student now knows, Penn was wrong: Democrats, unlike the Republicans, apportion their delegates according to vote totals, rather than allowing any state to award them winner-take-all. Sitting nearby, veteran Democratic insider Harold M. Ickes, who had helped write those rules, was horrified — and let Penn know it. "How can it possibly be," Ickes asked, "that the much vaunted chief strategist doesn't understand proportional allocation?" And yet the strategy remained the same, with the campaign making its bet on big-state victories. Even now, it can seem as if they don't get it. Both Bill and Hillary have noted plaintively that if Democrats had the same winner-take-all rules as Republicans, she'd be the nominee.

Clearly, she and Bill simply felt they were entitled to the Presidency.

:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. I could have given her better advice for $100,000. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
18. He Also Thought Ahmed Chalabi Would Be The Next Leader of Iraq
When he lobbied for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. What. An. Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. And they'd be greeted as liberators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
21. The terrible way her campaign has been run is a huge warning sign against electing her President.
Edited on Thu May-08-08 09:37 AM by Pirate Smile
I'm sorry but it is true. The shockingly bad strategy, purely short-term thinking i.e. just get through the next election and who cares about the long-term implications, etc. is exactly what has been wrong with how the US Government has been run for a long time. We need to get away from that but it is exactly what we would have gotten from another Clinton Administration.

edit to add - ABC: Stephanopoulos said sources tell him the Clinton campaign debt is far higher than the reported $10 million — and could be double or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. You mean ignoring facts, appointing cronies...
Edited on Thu May-08-08 11:05 AM by wileedog
... applying out of touch strategies that even your base deplores, bending rules, making shit up thinking no one will notice and spending money like its on fire are NOT effective means of leading a country?

Color Bush surprised...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. It is shocking, I know.
;)

I was surprised to see that it was how she would run a campaign. Horrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
22. A perfect example of someone who failed to "google it" unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
23. DUH. Did Hillary not ever talk to the man about this?
If she had been involved with her campaign, she would have known. She trusted him and paid him millions without every knowing his strategy.

How the hell would she have run the country? Scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. That's where the buck stops, sparosnare
Exactly right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
25. You're doin a heck of a job, Penny! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
26. JUDGMENT, or lack thereof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. That's what you get when you hire a Republican and don't manage your campaign.
This woman is incompetent in the same way Bush has been incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
28. That's what you get when you surround yourself with Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SurfingAtWork Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
29. LOL. And people want to trust Hillary with choosing an Executive cabinet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
30. You know, it occurred to me after hearing them crow about the win in Indiana,
that although they must all know that the delegates are awareded proportionally, they ACT like they're running a general election. In all the campaign pronouncements, etc., it's all about winning and not about the margin. If it were the general election, winning Indiana by 51% would have meant a lot more than it does at this time.

Maybe it still hasn't sunk in? I mean intellectually, as I said, they must all know it's true, but maybe this is an area where Hillary's experience of 2 general elections has actually hurt her. Her brain and gut probably automatically respond to this stuff the way they responded in 1992 and 1996.

ah well,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Exactly right. They STILL don't get it.
And most of the MSM still doesn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm willing to bet the gas tax holiday was his idea also
He still is a major force in her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. Well it was floated by the McCain campaign first
I think Hillary's campaign jumped on it simply because at first the idea polled well. One would expect that it would. If you just asked a question "Should we cut your taxes and cut the price of gas?" people's first reaction will generally be "Yes!" .Penn is first and foremost a pollster, so you know he said to push it. Bill Clinton didn't decide what color socks to wear without taking a poll first. No reason to think Hillary's political strategy is any different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
32. It took a lot of experience and good judgment to pick that guy.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
35. Silly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. Hillary hires based on loyalty, not on competence.
Yet another trait she shares with W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
41. I really, truly hate to say this, but...
But this little tidbit has push me very, very close to switching my support to Barack Obama from Hillary Clinton. I've never liked Mark Penn, but I've always wondered just what the hell she was thinking letting this fat turd anywhere near her campaign... I cringe at the thought of just how loathsome that man is... Obama, on the other hand, had the sense of mind to select David Axelrod. That's damn good judgment. Mark Penn. Not so good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
42. If proportional representation has been in force for about 20 years....
then it was in place during Bill's run for office. They KNEW full well how it worked in California then and NOW. Are we to believe Bill would not have been fully involved in her campaign from the start?

I'm not buying this, Penn is disgusting for many reasons but this latest "revelation" smacks of scapegoating to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. I disagree...
If anything it makes one wonder about Senator Clinton's judgment and reason for keeping him on after this HUGE bumble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC