Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The importance of the age of GDP voters:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
shomino Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:39 PM
Original message
The importance of the age of GDP voters:
I was listening to some political discussion on NPR today and a particular comment was made that struck me:

Clinton does better among older voters, Obama does better among younger voters. Think about the significance this has for the future of the Democratic Party. If the nomination goes to Clinton it may disenfranchise a lot of younger voters, who are the future of the Democratic party.

I admit this is coming from the perspective of an Obama backer and I give the Clinton supporters all regards for their candidate, who I do respect, but nonetheless:

Don't you think that if the nomination were given to Clinton by the older generation of Democratic party insiders (SD's) despite Obama's delegate lead that it would alienate a large base of newly inspired voters, young voters who have become involved for the first time in a long time? That these people are the future of the Democratic Party? Will they continue to be the future of the Democratic Party if such a decision is made?

Aren't these pretty big questions to consider regarding the future of the party and what it holds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Super delegates are going to look at that
Another point...will SDs blow off a candidate who has seemingly unlimited fundraising potential?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. and you're not afraid of losing the over 50 vote?
Seriously.

Where are the youngers going to go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think it's the over 60 vote that he has trouble with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. A lot of them went to Nader in 2000
Lock them out and it opens the possibility, perhaps not in 2008 but later, that a third-party candidate could peel off a lot of democratic support--or even flip to R if they are able to get an appealing candidate. (If you doubt that, then you might want to look at polls for party identification following 9/11--many young people suddenly became republicans. Thank god we got them back.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm not so sure we care if they leave....
What we see of them here on DU is shockingly ignorant. And many of them are the same people who did agitprop to split the party in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shomino Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Interesting attitude.
You tell someone "I don't care if you leave" basically telling them they have no worth in your party, then point the finger at them for leaving eh? Wow, self fulfilling prophecy there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. WTF is considered older??
My lovely spouse is 59, I'm 56.....

And we both vote team Obama!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shomino Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. My apologies,
No offense to the older Obama supporters at all. =)

I am simply referring to the fact that his campaign has brought in more new, young, first time voters than hers. New members of the Democratic Party, who may easily become more discouraged with the party than the die-hard veteran Clinton supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I know, I was talking about the "experts"
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. White female waaaay over 50. Gobama!!....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wrong question
Edited on Wed May-07-08 03:43 PM by hawkowl88
I think that the correct question is, will older voters support Obama in the general election? And will younger voters support Clinton if she were to run in the general.

I think the seniors will rally around whomever the nominee is. They have seen everything and are a pragmatic bunch not bound by starry eyed idealism. They know by HARD experience that compromise is necessary and that half a pie is better than none.

As regards to younger voters, especially the under thirty crowd, I expect a significantly less percentage would be motivated enough to show up and vote for Clinton. I don't think they would vote for McCain. I just think that they would be in a disillusioned stupor of crushed hopes and wouldn't turn out for Clinton. Remember that the first disillusionment is the hardest. These young idealistic voters are often new voters and will be absolutely necessary in crushing the rethugs with an overwhelming turnout. Turnout is everything because it is needed to overcome the corruption and theft by the criminal rethuglicans.

As for myself, I'm perhaps at the tail end of the younger generation (41), and am old enough to have been disillusioned earlier, but that has merely hardened my resolve not to compromise. Or I should say that Obama IS my compromise choice (Edwards was my first choice) and I draw the line in the sand after that. I will not vote for Clinton. However, I don't think there are many people my age that take such a hard line as I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well I am a year older
I originally liked Bidden most but pretty early i realized he wasn't going to make it so I switched to Obama. In the beginning I would have been ok with clinton but now I wont touch her with a ten foot pole. You are not alone in your hard position at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC