Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA/CLARK 08!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:04 AM
Original message
OBAMA/CLARK 08!!!!!
If I can't have this...



This will do very nicely...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. That was my original dream ticket
Edited on Wed May-07-08 09:44 AM by rocknation
The first thing I did after recovering from celebrating the November 06 election was make banner:



But Clark's embrace of Hillary makes me worry that he'll be a DLC pipeline.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
41. i would work for this ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
44. too bad Clark endorsed/worked for Hillary
that puts him out of the running in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Mine, too. For Obama to take on one of Hillary's zealous supporters....
...would make everything he has campaigned on a lie.

You can't have real change in D.C. if you're anchored with a zealous advocate for the status quo, Bush/Rove, pig-slop Clinton politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #44
70. Which makes Clark the perfect "bridge" between the 2 camps. A surrogate unity ticket - perfect!
He brings national security credentials to the Obama campaign, and carries HRC backing, if she can get over her bruised ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. That would be a very powerful ticket n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. This ticket will guarantee us a landslide victory. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. I posted this dream ticket a month ago and people laughed at me.
I think Clark on the ticket would appease most HRC fans since he's a Hill booster and would mute any foreign policy argument from the right.

I'm all for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Now that ticket would get my money (on credit, since I don't have any money, lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well...................
If I can't have Wes Clark on the top of the ticket, I'll take second slot.....American can't do much better than Wes Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. i like. i really like. i would have voted him for pres.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'd like Clark or Richardson
Either one would be a great choice for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
purji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. me too,either one would be great.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Not so fast........
He would be a great Sec of Defense.


Obama/Richardson 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. He can't be Sec Def...
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. That would be a fantastic ticket!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. I can live with this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Clark strikes me as a political opportunist- just don't trust him for some reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I would trust him with my life
I mean that literally, I would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Did he show signs of progressive leanings during his military years?
Edited on Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM by Alhena
It just seems like he was your average four-star general for many years, then *poof* he's a politician telling progressives everything they want to hear. Rising to the highest ranks of the military "cover your ass" burocracy tends to make me doubt his true beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. Yes he did.
In a number of ways. For one thing he was always very supportive of women and minorities rising through the ranks. Well before he ran for President, Clark filed a legal brief on behalf of the University of Michigan before the Supreme Court in support of their affirmative action program. Clark also showed real sensitivity toward gay and lesbians under his command. Clark won an award from an environmental organization for his efforts to preserve habitat for an endangered land tortoise while he was a commander in the south west.

The thing is, I have been a life long anti war and environment activist. I approached Wes Clark as a skeptic in 2003 before finally becoming an incredibly loyal supporter of his. I have met Wes on numerous occasions. I meant every word of it, I would now trust him with my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. I'm open to being persuaded- he would help Obama's C in C credentials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Here is a link to an entry in the personal blog I had about Clark
How I First Came To Support Wes Clark For President
http://www.aleftturnforclark.com/2006/12/

If you have spare time to burn you can read me rant for Clark for hours over there, if that one post doesn't tell you more than you possibly could want to know about my opinion of Clark, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. He is a straight shooter who I would trust with my life and this nation's security.
He is an impressive progressive who would complement Obama tremendously.

Also, he is a team player, which is a quality many do not seem to appreciate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. I would trust him with my life as I trusted him with my nephew's life
when he was in Bosnia. He is the only one I completely trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Any verification on the story that the General called Hillary last night and asked her to stand down
Edited on Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM by newmajority
If that is true, I would definitely feel better about Clark as a VP. He may be the one guy in Camp Hillary who is capable of putting the country and the party before the Clintons.

Other than that, Richardson still looks like a strong choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. That is the dream ticket for me..
Love em both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. Unite the Clarkies!!
Hillary's blustering on Iran is opposite of what Clark was calling on Bush to do. Clarkies had to turn themselves into pretzels to follow Hillary. I just couldn't do it. It made me sad to go to the Clark Community Network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Hey, we could actually see Clark in the WH after all!
Who would have thunk it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
67. Heh, wouldn't that be nice?
Unite the Clarkies!!

This has been a tough time for Clarkies. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
20. Hell to the yes
That would be a dream ticket for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's only one of two Obama VP picks
that would get my support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. or Jim Webb
Clark would be a great choice, and not from the Senate. But I do like Jim Webb, who has shown no tolerance for taking sh*t from republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #23
45. Webb would be a great choice, but I just don't want to lose his
Senate seat in Virginia, which would be very hard to defend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. You're looking at a mighty fine ticket there. Obama/Clark Baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurgedVoter Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
26. K & R
Been dreaming about it.

Since it is impossible now, to have the Barbara Jordan, Molly Ivins ticket (It would have redeemed Texas for all time!) This is the ticket I want!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
27. I think it would be perfect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. It would be perfect
The above ground case that John McCain would attempt to make against Barack Obama is that he is not experienced enough to protect our nation from it's enemies. There is no one, absolutely no one, who Barack Obama could run with who would better counter that argument than Wes Clark.

The under the radar case that Republican operatives will attempt to make against Barack Obama is that his patriotism can'[t be trusted. There is no one, absolutely no one, who Barack Obama could run with who would better counter that argument than Wes Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
30. I'd support the ticket only because it might actually win the GE.
I'd rather see Clark as Secretary of Defense.

And I'd even prefer Hillary to Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
31. I like it..
I think choosing Clark would bring some of the Clinton supporters back into the fold that may feel apathetic with Clinton's loss. Clark brings a strong southern voice, a respected military career, vast diplomatic experience, and loads of patriotism to the ticket. All things that Obama will need in the GE.

Then again, I'll always be a Clarkie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
48. he's also an economist. :) Europe would dig it and so would other
places around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
32. Clark was a loser 4 years ago
when running a general made a certain kind of sense. He has nothing at all to offer Obama now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
33. That would be powerful and Clark would add a LOT on Ntl Security/FoPo
I'd vote for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'd volunteer for Obama if he put Clark on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaylee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. I REALLY want Clark to be VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
37. Wes Clark is highly respected by military personnel...
an issue that's going to explode in the general. He will level the field for those that attempt to use McCains military experience against Obama. Clark has deep roots in the Jewish community. I believe he currently lives in Fl. an important state again in the general. Clark attracts both Democrats, Independents, and appeals to Republicans. That he loyally supported Clinton during primary season would be an opportunity to pass the peace pipe to Hillary supporters. Wes Clark on the ticket would be a coup for Obama and an unbeatable ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
39. After Webb, Clark is my second choice for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
40. I like this ticket, but Clark is supporting HRC... doubt it will happen.
He was paraded out as a hillary supporter on that disastrous debate... clearly a planned strategy for HRC (and ABC/Disney?) to show a popular figure supporting her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
43. Aren't the Clinton's and Clark very close.
Both are from Arkansas and go back many years. Probably not going to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #43
49. That could be a reason FOR it to happen
They are close, yes, but I am confident from my sources inside Clark's political organization that had he seen a real road to possible victory open to him that Clark would have entered the race this year opposing Hillary Clinton if necessary. He would have done so in a respectful manner, much like Biden, but what kept him out of the race was not loyalty to Clinton. Clark waited until September 07 to actually endorse Hillary, many loyalists were on board with her far earlier than that.

Clark can be a bridge builder inside of the Democratic Party now, which is much more divided than reading Democratic Underground would seem to indicate. Once Clark realized that he could not win the nomination himself in 2004 there was no Democrat more loyal to John Kerry than Wes Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. This is encouraging information. You also nailed it.
Clark can be a "bridge builder."

We have a grand opportunity to make some serious inroads into Republican strongholds in this country as well as take this party in a new direction.

Clark, Kerry, Kennedy... Obama

We can create a formidable team that will be unbeatable for years to come and usher in another "New Deal" era of peace and prosperity for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #43
68. Or, once she realizes its over, she could negotiate to get one of hers on his team.
Like the Jesse Jackson campaign did with Bill Clinton in 92 to get Ron Brown a cabinet position. And it could be her contribution to bring unity to the party and engage her supporters in an Obama nomination. Lots of ins and outs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
47. Can someone explain to me DU and some others Obsession with Wes Clark?
I've never understood why he's pushed so much. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. If you attended YearlyKos in Chicago last Summer you might have a better sense
It's npt just at DU. Clark was given standing ovations addressing the full Kos Convention. He is a truly honest man who has always been open and respectful toward the netroots while never pandering to anyone. Here is my blog entry about how I was converted into a Clark supporter in 2003:

http://www.aleftturnforclark.com/2006/12/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. okay...thanks ...I'll check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexanDem Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
50. YES!! Obama/Clark !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
53. An unstoppable ticket. Clark would go off on anyone questioning Obama's patriotism. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
55. I always loved those photos of Gore and Clark...
...this one of Obama is a nice addition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
56. Am I the only one who's noticed ...
... that the day after the most Hawkish of the Dem candidates (Clinton) is given the boot, there's suddenly a PLETHORA of threads calling for a military GENERAL to be named to the ticket ?!?

Coincidence ?!? I think not.

Do you all know how deep the Military Industrial Complex has their claws sunk into this country, and the mind-boggling amount of our taxpayer's dollars they're dependent on ? After all these years of (needless) War do we really want to now put a GENERAL into the White House, just when it looks like this country might be willing to turn to the Left ?!

I'll answer that ... HELL NO !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Look who is posting the threads though.
Edited on Wed May-07-08 01:27 PM by Tom Rinaldo
Mostly long time DU members who have been strong advocates for Barack Obama. Clark has genuine netroots support.

I doubt you will find a more ardent Obama supporter on DU than FrenchieCat, so you might be interested in reading this entry she has posted on a personal blog she started last year about Clark. It deals with his relationship with the Military Industrial Complex which is why I suggest it:

What Wes Clark said about the MIC - Military Industrial Complex
Radio Interview with Laura Knoy:
http://www.nhpr.org/node/5339

"I think General Eisenhower was exactly right. I think we should be concerned about the military industrial complex. I think if you look at where the country is today, you've consolidated all these defense firms into a few large firms, like Halliburton, with contacts and contracts at the highest level of government. You've got most of the retired Generals, are one way or another, associated with the defense firms. That's the reason that you'll find very few of them speaking out in any public way. I'm not. When I got out I determined I wasn't going to sell arms, I was going to do as little as possible with the Defense Department, because I just figured it was time to make a new start.

But I think that the military industrial complex does wield a lot of influence. I'd like to see us create a different complex, and I'm going to be talking about foreign policy in a major speech tomorrow, but we need to create an agency that is not about waging war, but about creating the conditions for Peace around the world. We need some people who will be advocates for Peace, advocates for economic development not just advocates for better weapons systems. So we need to create countervailing power to the military industrial complex."


Clark: Don't spare Pentagon
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/25/elec04.prez.debate/
"We're faced with a very serious deficit problem. We need to keep the--we need to go back to the top 2 percent and repeal those tax cuts. We need to put all the government spending programs on the table, including the military programs. We need to then have no new programs unless you can pay as you go. And then we need a simpler, fairer, more progressive tax code. "

http://www.rapidfire-silverbullets.com/clarks_views_on_the_mic_pnac_t/

edited to fix link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. You obviously have no information on General Clark to go on.....
Edited on Wed May-07-08 01:24 PM by FrenchieCat
Tom Rinaldo presented you with some info.

I suggest your review it, prior to making statements about who's for what, etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. Am I the only one who's noticed ...

... that the day after the most Hawkish of the Dem candidates (Clinton) is given the boot, there's suddenly a PLETHORA of threads calling for a military GENERAL to be named to the ticket ?!?

Coincidence ?!? I think not.

Do you all know how deep the Military Industrial Complex has their claws sunk into this country, and the mind-boggling amount of our taxpayer's dollars they're dependent on ? After all these years of (needless) War do we really want to now put a GENERAL into the White House, just when it looks like this country might be willing to turn to the Left ?!

I'll answer that ... HELL NO !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. See my reply to your dupe post above n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. If you knew more about Clark..you would not be saying that...
Edited on Wed May-07-08 01:28 PM by tokenlib
Clark is very progressive--and in dealing with the military industrial complex he could be the candidate who can do the most about it--even as VP. In 2004 a number of us were talking to Wes Clark Jr.and we began to realize that his father is a decent man who actually is an postive answer to your concerns that many of us share.. Try to be a bit more open minded about Clark--he is a good and honorable progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Do you really see him dismantling our bases in Iraq ?
I don't.

Do you see him trying to cut back on our bloated military budget ?

I don't.


Whatever his good points may be, the last thing this country needs right now is a Military man in the White House. Let the pendulum swing a bit to the Left first people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Actually yes, I believe his goal would be to get us out carefully...
Edited on Wed May-07-08 01:40 PM by tokenlib
Not only based on what Wes Clark has said--but also on what his son has said. Wes, Jr. knows his father's heart better than anyone else. He isn't the war mongering General you think--he is a General that progressives and people who have opposed this war can believe in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. He called for UN control over the original Iraq Occupation Authority
Edited on Wed May-07-08 01:47 PM by Tom Rinaldo
after the U.S. invaded. Clark thought it was a mistake for the U.S. to try to run Iraq even then. He also has long been firmly on record that the U.S. has to openly renounce any intention of or desire for permanent bases inside of Iraq.

Look, obviously I am a true Clark believer but I have long supported him as a progressive because of his overall stance on issues, including domestic ones. But the other point is there is a good argument for believing that Obama's best chance for winning is to take the false patriotism issue off the table and bury it as deeply as possible so we can have a progressive administration come 2009 rather than a President McCain. I think Clark is the type of VP pick who can guarantee a progressive victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Yes to both. And he has said as much himself...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
63. Interesting ticket.
I think it could work very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
69. Sounds good to me.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
71. Well, at least one individual on this ticket is qualified to be POTUS.....the Veep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC