Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

United States Supreme Court....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:27 AM
Original message
United States Supreme Court....
Think about THIS ONE

I know some of you are realizing that Hillary has lost the nomination and your natural reaction is to pull back... not vote, stay home

You need to grieve

But for the record... NEITHER of the two candidates is my preferred one

I will place fingers on nose, and press tightly as I vote for Obama

Would have done the same if that was Hillary

No, I don't consider either of these two machine politicians the best the country could offer

And policy wise there is not that much difference between them

You could say that 2006 killed the hope

But .... In november we will need all decks on hand

If you think either of these two threw the kitchen sink or ran a dirty campaign, you have not seen anything yet

Now Hillary herself said today... "I WILL WORK FOR THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY."

Read this again ok...

"I WILL WORK FOR THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY."

You vote for the candidate I don't ask you to work for Obama, but to vote for Obama

And as I said repeteadly, he is not my preferred candidate either... but McInsane and the USSC are just two things that make me shiver ....

Can you say good bye to roe v wade?

Enough said....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Health care reform is more important
and we won't get it with Obama or McCain. If Clinton pulls out, we've lost something even more important than the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Cannot agree with you there.
I think SCOTUS is one of THE most important issues, because they have a wider reach.

I do agree that the health care plans are not what they could be, but no nominee's plan goes through as is. Hopefully Obama's will be improved along the way, but even if Clinton was the nominee, her plan would also not go through unscathed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. The health care crisis will destroy the US economy
it will be much worse than someone having to make a higher co-pay.

I'm sure you're young and will live forever, though, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Do explain to me how a RIGHT WING USSC
will help in this case?

I am serious...

(Free refresher course the RIGHT WING USSC under FDR declared some aspects of the new deal a no-no... you think they will not do the same to whoever is elected president in 2012 if we survive that long)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Actually, I'm in my 50's.
Sorry....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
35. There are like 20 different things that will destroy the economy in 20 years
Health care is on the middle of the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamaniac Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
57. Ozark, it's time to give up your hate buddy.
It's over. You fought hard for your candidate. Your candidate fought hard. But the election has been decided and it's over.

We are all Democrats here. This protracted race brought out some of the uglier aspects of our nature (from both sides), but we are all Democrats.

Let's kick McCain's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Independents won't flock toward Hillary's mandate
nothing like the government forcing people to do something to get them to resist it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. NEITHER will give you the type of healthcare reform the country needs
but if you think the USSC is not important, I have a bridge to sell you, serious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Obama won't, but the Congress he drags in with him just might.
With Hillary, it would have been 1994 all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. In this case the country is so much ahead of the politicos it is not even funny
I don't expect the politicos to get into that train unless we lead that parade... and 2006 proved to me that they are very much tone deaf on so many issues that if we get SOME progress I will be amazed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Obama has no coattails
that's been pretty well established.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. That is why he's about to win... the nom
ok

Look if you don't want to vote for him, fine

But at this point either of the two nominees is BETTER than the GOP candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Primary race
has nothing to do with coattails or winning the GE. Its possible to win the nomination and lose the GE. Check the history books. Its happened a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yes, but at this point HE IS THE NOMINEE
so you will vote against him? Just because you don't like him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Which is meaningless unless he wins the GE
I won't campaign or donate funds to him. If he emerges clean from the GOP drubbing he is sure to get, I'll vote for him. But there have been rare cases in the past when I've refused to vote for Dems, choosing not to vote at all, when they've been involved in criminal activity or engaged in other egregious behavior. Since Obama hasn't been vetted yet, I can't make that promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. He hasn't been VETTED?????
Hello? Where have you been for the past few months?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. No he hasn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Okay, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #37
58. So tell me how he hasn't been "vetted" about his religious experience and Hillary has?

I mean I guess NOONE has heard of Obama's connections to Jeremiah Wright, and by comparison EVERYONE has heard of Hillary's connections to that bible group called "The Fellowship" where she was good pals with the liks of Rick Santorum, Sam Brownback, and John Ashcroft. EVERYONE, RIGHT? That's why they liked her so much they had to vote for her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Well please focus on congress then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Always do
as well as the statehouse and county races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Sounds good!
Heck if we get a filibuster and republican trick proof majority in congress we cab get some SERIOUS changes going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. He hasn't be vetted?
Don't make any promises,

I can guarantee you though that when McInnsane wins (by your logic) you will enjoy a war with Iran, if not more wars than just that one

No health care, and a USSC so right wing...

Oh never mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. No, he hasn't
and if something comes out, it wouldn't matter if I voted for him 100 times, he'll lose anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #36
45. You know what is sad about the partisans... if it was Obama and not Clinton in this fix
I'd be having the exact same useless conversation with an Oama supporter

Not that it mattered, not until they woke up and smelled the roses

Sad... since partisans usually wake up after it is too late

One good thing of truly not having a horse in this race, but having decided a while ago that yellow dog was the only reasonable outcome for my wallet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
59. Don't tell all those superdelegates that he doesn't have coattails.
Most of the folks in the down-ticket races want Obama at the top of the ticket. Wonder why that is?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
62. Pure crap. Ever hear of Don Cazayoux?
He just won in the reddest of red districts in Baton Rouge, LA. His opponent turned the race into a referendum on Obama and Rev. Wright and he got his ass kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Clinton's is the better plan
that has the most realistic chance of getting us to a single payer system.

And yes, its more important than the SCOTUS, since so much of our economy and future depends on getting a handle on the growing crisis.

As for SCOTUS, Obama isn't going to win. If, by some chance he defies the odds, there's nothing to indicate he would appoint good judges either. The idea of Obama being liberal is a myth. There's nothing in his brief legislative record to indicate such a thing. He's a machine politician - he does what his financial backers tell him to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Neither is a liberal... they are BOTH machine politicos
those of us who are NOT partisans understood this a while ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. Then why not work to get things fixed?
Obama cant do jack shit with health care except made ideas and sign them in. Otherwise that is ALL congress.

So How about this?

Forget trying to help Obama.. Yes Hold your nose and vote but forget doing anything otherwise.

And trade that for assisting the multiple candidates for congress that have your ideas for heath care in mind. I believe that Al Franken's and a few others like Clinton's plan but that is research you will have to do.

Trust me I understand that Congress is JUST as important as the presidency. I would much rather you focus your efforts there than worrying about the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. It's time to give it a rest OzarkDem. I'm sorry your candidate didn't win but at some
point negative opinions stated as fact (when they are anything but) become self-fulfilling prophesies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. Sorry, but I've examined all the plans closely
and even watched their surrogates in a panel discussion on health care reform last week in DC. Obama's plan is weak, and they've already begun backtracking on some of the promises he's made.

IIRC, his surrogate was saying if he's elected, they will basically sit down and examine health care reform again and come up with a new plan. It didn't sound positive and it wasn't leaning towards covering more people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. His "Big table" plan has been talked about for months.
And it is far more effective because it exposes assholes trying to derail the process to protect the companies.

And no I could care less if Clinton or Obama or Santa did it. Its an idea that will have to happen with multiple topics to keep assholes from lobbying to prevent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. I agree with John Edwards
If you let the insurance companies sit at the table, they'll eat all the food. Nothing will get resolved if they are allowed at the table.

And why would Obama present a detailed health care reform plan in his campaign if he has no intention of sticking to it. Some people would call that dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #46
55. I do not think they will gobble up everything.
A slew of cameras will be in their face so they cant do jack without them being exposed 20 mins later.

And if they try to lobby congress people afterwards? Well if the people have been watching a plan develop and they like it. If congress tries to alter and screw with it then people in congress are going to be exposed.

That that means democrats will get fucked with politically but that is a small price to pay to break the chain of bullshit in congress and the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #41
61. Oh good grief.
Nevermind, you just keep on spewing your negativity. That'll make everything better. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Who gives a hell about healthcare when McCain takes Obama being defeated as a sign?
Only losing Roe vs Wade would be lucky compared to what we would lose if McCain wins against the "Change" and "Open" candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
60. We won't get it with Clinton either. If it ain't single payer, it's worthless
We can get it if we the people push Congress hard enough to pass HR 676. If we can do that, neither Clinton nor Obama would refuse to sign it. McSame damned well would, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Work for Obama. I am asking. There is too much at stake.
He is a democrat and shares about 98% major issues with Hillary and the rest of the party. Let's win this in NOVEMBER! GO OBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I will vote for obama, but I will NOT work for him
just as I have not worked for her.

I will vote for him, the same way I would have voted for her... with finger on nose

that you can be assured off

the USSC is at stake, cannot afford another Repig to get the nominating power

But 2006 soured me on the process and the media this year proved to me how rigged the system is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. You will say good bye to roe v wade, if McCain wins
That's my honest belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. And if you reread the OP you will realzie that is EXACTLY what I said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I know you did, I was agreeing with you
Is that ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, of course
my bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tresalisa Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. If sig lines weren't turned off tonight,
you all would see mine, and the reason why I'm voting for our nominee, same as the OP is saying, SCOTUS!

Many of us first supported someone else. My candidate was Dennis Kucinich. I am not 100% happy that we are left with Clinton or Obama, but you can't always get the candidate you want. Any Democratic candidate is better than the republican.

:kick: and recommend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Well I started with Dennis and voted for Edwards in the Cali primary
even if he suspended his campaign a day or two before, and I was impressed by Obama early on, but a couple of his comments and a review of votes revealed how similar he was to her.

I am not pleased, but will vote for him... better than four more years of Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'll need nose plugs, some goggles, and a rain poncho, but I'll vote for him...
oh, and a bucket as well. Let's just say I'm decidedly unenthusiastic about the guy, or Hillary for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Exactly, my nose plugs will have all the
logos of the media corporations, but will be there, perhaps not as bright and early as I did with Kerry... but will be there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. As I've put it in many other posts, I'm not voting for the Democrats, I'm voting against the...
Republicans. The biggest reasons are because of the USSC, as you said, and because, overall, Democrats do less damage to the nation than Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:17 AM
Original message
BINGO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. But what if the GOP digs up something
very unsavory in his past? Not a faux scandal, but something real. That's a very big concern. He hasn't been vetted, we don't know what can surface from his past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. All I care about are his positions on the issues are better than McCain's...
Edited on Wed May-07-08 03:08 AM by Solon
They aren't good positions, but a slight improvement over the Republicans, so that's enough. Understand that I would be saying the EXACT same thing if Hillary was now the presumptive nominee. I don't care about this bullshit about not being vetted, I don't even like either candidate on even a personal level, so it wouldn't affect my vote one iota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
47. You fight it HARD
Edited on Wed May-07-08 03:15 AM by Zachstar
When I was a republican I was watching the democrats get their asses handed to them on the swiftboat issue because they were not fighting effectively.

And don't worry what they could find in Obama's past. (OH noes he Hugged Wright! once!) Compared to what is going to be exposed on McCain. It ain't nothing. McCains own little pastor problem is going to sink him quite easy.

That is why I 100 percent approve of his quick response team. This is not the cold war of politics Candidates need to be able to dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Swiftboating was different
It was based on lies, and I would expect Obama to fight something like that. My concern is the GOP digging something up that is true and that he can't fight back on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. You fight regardless.
Look there is come crap that is true about Clinton that the republicans have been archiving for almost a decade. She will have to fight hard.

Nobody is perfect. There is going to be some shit and the republicans are going to go ape.

Yet they are not unified. Paul supporters are tearing up the republican party. Paul will not support McCain if Obama becomes the nominee and instantly McCain will lose netroots.

Without netroots their slime tactics will not work as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
51. you mean like the Arkansas project?
COUNT ON IT... a real or imagined scandal, and that WILL HAPPEN to anybody we run

even Jesus H Christ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
43. The new president needs to be leaned on
to appoint not just liberals, but economic populists to the court. Currently, there are none. This court is perhaps the most disturbingly favorable to corporate interests in the modern era. And Roberts has been crowding the docket with a larger percentage of corporate cases than have been heard in decades. The occasional pushback comes only from, ironically enough, the Scalia/Thomas wing, under the rubric of States Rights.

Big Business has been solidifying their status as a protected class with little fanfare and no notice. We need justices properly skeptical of Chicago School "free market" ideology. Badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. My question now is, are even the most ardent of Obama supporters ready to become his opponents...
after he wins the Presidency? That is what they will have to become in order to have any influence on his presidency itself, and that is to oppose what he does wrong, and pressure him to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. If Obama screws up I am going to say somthing about it.
When I decided to throw my support to Obama I did not do so thinking I was going to kiss his ass all the way to reelection. I intend to see that Change. We do not have another decade to fuck around.

Obama has stated again he is accountable to the people, not lobbyists. If he tries to move away from that he will fail reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. As long as you are willing to stick to your guns, I respect that...
I doubt the resolve of many others, however, especially when it comes to the most obvious way to voice disapproval, and that is to not vote for the candidate again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. I dunno
Couldn't say. I'm not bedazzled by the guy, so I'll be loudly pissed with him pretty quick if (when) he does something boneheaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. I can guarantee boneheaded
but after the last eight years perhaps he'll have a little more of a leeway....

Then again there is 2006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
63. Kick for thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
64. "all decks on hand"
I will be dropping that phrase into conversations from now on.

Excellent points. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. You welcome and feel free to use them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC